Expression of miR-223 to predict outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for aortic stenosis (AS) in patients at increased surgical risk. Up to 29% of patients annually experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after TAVI. MicroRNAs (miRNA) are currently widely investigated as novel cardiovascular biomarkers. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of TAVI on the expressions of selected miRNAs associated with platelet function (miR-125a-5p, miR-125b and miR-223), and evaluate the predictive value of these miRNAs for MACCE in 65 patients undergoing TAVI. Methods: Venous blood samples for miRNA expression analysis were collected 1 day before TAVI and at hospital discharge. The expression of miR-223, miR-125a-5p, miR-125b was evaluated in platelet-depleted plasma. Results: The expression of miR-223 and miR-125b increased after TAVI, compared to the measurement before (p = 0.020, p = 0.003, respectively). Among 63 patients discharged from the hospital, 18 patients experienced MACCE (29%) during the median 15 months of observation. Baseline low miR-223 expression was a predictor of MACCE in univariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–7.01; p = 0.041). After inclusion of covariates, age, gender (male), New York Heart Association class and diabetes into the multivariate Cox regression model, miR-223 did not reach statistical significance (HR: 2.56, 95% CI: 0.79–8.33; p = 0.118). Conclusions: To conclude, miR-223 might improve risk stratification after TAVI. Further studies are required to confirm the clinical applicability of this promising biomarker

Prostacyclin analogues decrease platelet aggregation but have no effect on thrombin generation, fibrin clot structure, and fibrinolysis in pulmonary arterial hypertension : PAPAYA coagulation

Prostacyclin (PGI2) analogues (epoprostenol, treprostonil, iloprost) are the cornerstone of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment. PGI2 analogues inhibit platelet reactivity, but their impact on coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters has not been elucidated. We compared platelet reactivity, thrombin generation, clot permeation, and lysis properties in patients with PAH treated with PGI2 analogues (n = 20) and those not receiving PGI2 analogues (n = 20). Platelet reactivity was lower in patients treated with PGI2 analogues, compared to the control group, as evaluated with arachidonic acid (ASPI), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and thrombin receptor-activating peptide-6 (TRAP) tests (p = .009, p = .02, p = .007, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, both treprostinil and epoprostenol decreased platelet reactivity to the similar extent. There were no differences regarding thrombin generation, clot permeation, and lysis parameters in patients receiving and not receiving PGI2 analogues (p ≥ .60 for all). In the subgroup analysis, there were no differences regarding coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters between treprostinil, epoprostenol, and no PGI2 analogues. To conclude, patients with PAH treated with PGI2 analogues have reduced platelet reactivity, but similar clot formation and lysis parameters, compared to patients not receiving PGI2 analogues. Further randomized clinical trials are required to confirm these findings

Intravascular Imaging versus Physiological Assessment versus Biomechanics—Which Is a Better Guide for Coronary Revascularization

Today, coronary artery disease (CAD) continues to be a prominent cause of death worldwide. A reliable assessment of coronary stenosis represents a prerequisite for the appropriate management of CAD. Nevertheless, there are still major challenges pertaining to some limitations of current imaging and functional diagnostic modalities. The present review summarizes the current data on invasive functional and intracoronary imaging assessment using optical coherence tomography (OCT), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Amongst the functional parameters—on top of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)—we point to novel angiography-based measures such as quantitative flow ratio (QFR), vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR), angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRangio), and computed tomography-derived flow fractional reserve (FFR-CT), as well as hybrid approaches focusing on optical flow ratio (OFR), computational fluid dynamics and attempts to quantify the forces exaggerated by blood on the coronary plaque and vessel wall