Versican but not decorin accumulation is related to malignancy in mammographically detected high density and malignant-appearing microcalcifications in non-palpable breast carcinomas

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Mammographic density (MD) and malignant-appearing microcalcifications (MAMCs) represent the earliest mammographic findings of non-palpable breast carcinomas. Matrix proteoglycans versican and decorin are frequently over-expressed in various malignancies and are differently involved in the progression of cancer. In the present study, we have evaluated the expression of versican and decorin in non-palpable breast carcinomas and their association with high risk mammographic findings and tumor characteristics.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Three hundred and ten patients with non-palpable suspicious breast lesions, detected during screening mammography, were studied. Histological examination was carried out and the expression of decorin, versican, estrogen receptor α (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR) and c-erbB2 (HER-2/neu) was assessed by immunohistochemistry.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Histological examination showed 83 out of 310 (26.8%) carcinomas of various subtypes. Immunohistochemistry was carried out in 62/83 carcinomas. Decorin was accumulated in breast tissues with MD and MAMCs independently of the presence of malignancy. In contrast, versican was significantly increased only in carcinomas with MAMCs (median ± SE: 42.0 ± 9.1) and MD (22.5 ± 10.1) as compared to normal breast tissue with MAMCs (14.0 ± 5.8), MD (11.0 ± 4.4) and normal breast tissue without mammographic findings (10.0 ± 2.0). Elevated levels of versican were correlated with higher tumor grade and invasiveness in carcinomas with MD and MAMCs, whereas increased amounts of decorin were associated with <it>in situ </it>carcinomas in MAMCs. Stromal deposition of both proteoglycans was related to higher expression of ERα and PR in tumor cells only in MAMCs.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The specific accumulation of versican in breast tissue with high MD and MAMCs only in the presence of malignant transformation and its association with the aggressiveness of the tumor suggests its possible use as molecular marker in non-palpable breast carcinomas.</p

Interobserver Agreement between On-Call Radiology Resident and General Radiologist Interpretations of CT Pulmonary Angiograms and CT Venograms

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has long been recognized as a life-threatening emergency, and although the statistics vary widely depending on the clinical setting, associated mortality rates have been estimated at 100 000 deaths per year in the United States, including 15% of in-hospital deaths. Consequently, the ability to obtain rapid and accurate diagnosis of PE becomes critical for clinical management, namely, early initiation of anticoagulant therapy. Current clinical practice algorithms advocate use of computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) to reliably diagnose or exclude PE. Most commonly, PE results from deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Therefore, in addition to the diagnosis of PE, the evaluation of the lower limbs in order to detect the presence of DVT is important for appropriate patient management. Although DVT can be diagnosed or excluded via sonographic evaluation of the lower limbs with Doppler technique, the use of combined CTPA and computed tomographic venogram (CTV) for one-time imaging allows diagnosing both PE and DVT

Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this essay is to highlight the clinical features and imaging findings associated with different types of nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism is an infrequent condition with various causes that can be life-threatening pathologic conditions. The entity presents a diagnostic challenge because of the low specificity of clinical symptoms and imaging signs. Awareness of the imaging features of nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism facilitates correct diagnosis and leads to appropriate patient care

Enhancement of breast cancer on pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using computer-aided detection is associated with response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

International audiencePURPOSE:To evaluate whether enhancement of breast cancer on pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as evaluated semi-quantitatively using computer-aided detection (CAD) is associated with response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 84 women, (mean age, 51±10 [SD] years; range: 30-73 years) with 84 breast cancers who underwent MRI before neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were included in this retrospective study. The proportion of each type of signal intensity-time curve (SITC) (type 1: persistent; type 2: plateau; Type 3: washout) within the tumor volume was quantified semi-automatically using a CAD system (Aegis®, Sentinelle medical, Toronto, Canada) and was compared to histological features of the tumors and to pathological response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.RESULTS:Pathological complete response was obtained in 29 patients (35%). Proportion of SITC type 1 was greater in non-responders (P=0.019) while proportion of SITC type 3 was greater in responders (P=0.04). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of proportion of SITC type 1 for the identification of incomplete response on pathology were 42% (95% CI: 29%-56%), 90% (95% CI: 73%-98%), and 59% (95% CI: 48%-70%), respectively.CONCLUSION:Proportion of SITC type 1 (persistent) in breast cancers on pre-treatment MRI as semi-automatically quantified using a CAD system is associated with absence of pathological complete response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with good specificity

Occlusive arterial disease of abdominal aorta and lower extremities: comparison of helical CT angiography with transcatheter angiography.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate helical CT angiography in the assessment of occlusive arterial disease of abdominal aorta and the lower extremities. Sixteen patients underwent both transcatheter angiography and helical CT. Helical CT was inconclusive in 6.2% of segments whereas angiography was inconclusive in 5%. The overall sensitivity of helical CT was 91% and specificity 93%. Segmental analysis found a sensitivity of 43% in infrapopliteal arteries, and a specificity of 86%