The use of the SF-36 questionnaire in adult survivors of childhood cancer: evaluation of data quality, score reliability, and scaling assumptions

BACKGROUND: The SF-36 has been used in a number of previous studies that have investigated the health status of childhood cancer survivors, but it never has been evaluated regarding data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability in this population. As health status among childhood cancer survivors is being increasingly investigated, it is important that the measurement instruments are reliable, validated and appropriate for use in this population. The aim of this paper was to determine whether the SF-36 questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument in assessing self-perceived health status of adult survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS: We examined the SF-36 to see how it performed with respect to (1) data completeness, (2) distribution of the scale scores, (3) item-internal consistency, (4) item-discriminant validity, (5) internal consistency, and (6) scaling assumptions. For this investigation we used SF-36 data from a population-based study of 10,189 adult survivors of childhood cancer. RESULTS: Overall, missing values ranged per item from 0.5 to 2.9 percent. Ceiling effects were found to be highest in the role limitation-physical (76.7%) and role limitation-emotional (76.5%) scales. All correlations between items and their hypothesised scales exceeded the suggested standard of 0.40 for satisfactory item-consistency. Across all scales, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of reliability was found to be higher than the suggested value of 0.70. Consistent across all cancer groups, the physical health related scale scores correlated strongly with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) scale scores and weakly with the Mental Component Summary (MCS) scale scores. Also, the mental health and role limitation-emotional scales correlated strongly with the MCS scale score and weakly with the PCS scale score. Moderate to strong correlations with both summary scores were found for the general health perception, energy/vitality, and social functioning scales. CONCLUSION: The findings presented in this paper provide support for the validity and reliability of the SF-36 when used in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. These findings should encourage other researchers and health care practitioners to use the SF-36 when assessing health status in this population, although it should be recognised that ceiling effects can occur

Osteopenia, excess adiposity and hyperleptinaemia during 2 years of treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia without cranial irradiation

objective Osteopenia and excess adiposity occur following treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and the use of cranial irradiation is thought to be a significant contributory factor. Hyperleptinaemia has also been demonstrated following cessation of treatment for childhood ALL. Therefore a prospective study was undertaken to evaluate serial changes in percentage bone mineral content (BMC), adiposity and serum leptin concentrations during 2 years of treatment of children with ALL with chemotherapy but without cranial irradiation. design and patient Only patients treated using the MRC ALL 97/ALL 97 (modified 99) protocols for childhood ALL were eligible for entry into the study. A total of 14 patients (seven male, with a median age of 7·5 years (range 3·4–16·7 years) were recruited. Serial dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning was undertaken at diagnosis and during two years of treatment. Serum leptin concentrations were determined at the same time as the scans. results Reductions in %BMC were observed at the hip and lumbar spine by 12 months (P < 0·01) and remained low after 24 months of treatment. Subanalysis of %BMC measurements at the hip demonstrated a greater reduction in %BMC at the trochanteric region compared to the femoral neck. The percentage corrected fat mass increased from 6 months whereas the body mass index (BMI) standard deviation score (SDS) was increased after 24 months of treatment (P < 0·05). Serum leptin concentrations increased following 24 months of therapy (P < 0·05). conclusions Children treated for ALL with contemporary regimens have a predisposition to osteopenia, excess adiposity and hyperleptinaemia during treatment without cranial irradiation administration. We speculate that in addition to glucocorticoid administration, leptin resistance may account in part for these observations

Randomized Comparison of Intensified Six-Drug Versus Standard Three-Drug Chemotherapy for High-Risk Nonmetastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma and Other Chemotherapy-Sensitive Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Long-Term Results From the International Society of Pediatric Oncology MMT95 Study

Purpose MMT95 was the fourth of a series of International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) collaborations for children with high-risk nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The principal objective was to explore survival advantage for an intensified chemotherapy strategy in a randomized trial. Patients and Methods From July 1995 to June 2003, 457 previously untreated patients with incompletely resected embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), undifferentiated sarcoma, and soft tissue primitive neuroectodermal tumor at all sites except paratesticular, vagina, and uterus, or with alveolar RMS were randomly assigned to receive either ifosfamide, vincristine, and dactinomycin (IVA) or a six-drug combination (IVA plus carboplatin, epirubicin, and etoposide) both delivered over 27 weeks. Cumulative doses were as follows: ifosfamide 54 g/m(2) (both arms), epirubicin 450 mg/m(2), etoposide 1,350 mg/m(2) (six-drug regimen). Poor responders after three courses of IVA were to be switched to the other arm. Delivery of radiotherapy was determined according to site and/or response to chemotherapy with or without surgery. Results Overall survival (OS) for all patients was 81% (95% CI, 77% to 84%) at 3 years. No significant difference in outcome in either OS or event-free survival was noted between the two arms (3-year OS: 82% [95% CI, 76% to 86%] for IVA and 80% [95% CI, 74% to 85%] for the six-drug arm). Toxicity was significantly greater (infection, myelosuppression, and mucositis) in the six-drug arm. Overall burden of local therapy was consistent with data from previous SIOP studies and showed no difference between the two chemotherapy regimens. Conclusion Intensification of chemotherapy for nonmetastatic RMS and other chemotherapy-sensitive STS provides no survival advantage or reduction in the intensity of local therapy and adds toxicit

Non-parameningeal Head And Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma In Children, Adolescents, And Young Adults: Experience Of The European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (Epssg) – Rms2005 Study

Abstract Background/objectives The primary aim of this study was to analyse and evaluate the impact of different local treatments on the pattern of relapse in children with primary head and neck non-parameningeal (HNnPM) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), treated in the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 study. The secondary aim was to assess whether current risk stratification is valid for this specific site. Design/methods This study includes all patients with localised HNnPM RMS enrolled in the RMS2005 study between 2005 and 2016. Treatment comprised chemotherapy adapted to risk group, with local surgery and/or radiation therapy. The main outcome measures were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 165 patients were identified; the median age was 6.4 years (range, 0.1–25). The most common tumour sites were cheek/chin (22%) and nasal ala/nasolabial fold (20%). Histology was unfavourable for 40%, and regional nodal involvement present in 26%. Local therapy included surgery (58%) and/or radiotherapy (72%) to primary tumour and/or regional lymph nodes. After a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 6–158), 42 patients experienced an event, and 17 are still alive. Tumour events were frequent in oral primary (36%), parotid site (26%), cheek/chin (24%), and nasal ala/nasolabial fold (24%) and included locoregional failure in 84% of cases. The 5-year EFS and OS were 75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.3–81.2) and 84.9% (95% CI: 77.5–89.7), respectively. Favourable histology was associated with a better EFS (82.3% versus 64.6%; p = 0.02) and nodal spread with a worse OS (88.6% versus 76.1%; p = 0.04). Different sublocations within the HNnPM primary did not have significant impact on outcome. Conclusion Locoregional relapse/progression is the main tumour failure event in this site. Despite frequent unfavourable risk factors, HNnPM RMS remains a favourable location in the context of a risk-adapted strategy

Long-term survivors of childhood cancer: cure and care-the Erice Statement (2006) revised after 10 years (2016).

PURPOSE The number of persons who have successfully completed treatment for a cancer diagnosed during childhood and who have entered adulthood is increasing over time, and former patients will become aging citizens. METHODS Ten years ago, an expert panel met in Erice, Italy, to produce a set of principles concerning the cure and care of survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. The result was the Erice Statement (Haupt et al. Eur J Cancer 43(12):1778-80, 2007) that was translated into nine languages. Ten years on, it was timely to review, and possibly revise, the Erice Statement in view of the changes in paediatric oncology and the number and results of international follow-up studies conducted during the intervening years. RESULTS The long-term goal of the cure and care of a child with cancer is that he/she becomes a resilient and autonomous adult with optimal health-related quality of life, accepted in society at the same level as his/her age peers. "Cure" refers to cure from the original cancer, regardless of any potential for, or presence of, remaining disabilities or side effects of treatment. The care of a child with cancer should include complete and honest information for parents and the child. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Some members of the previous expert panel, as well as new invited experts, met again in Erice to review the Erice Statement, producing a revised version including update and integration of each of the ten points. In addition, a declaration has been prepared, by the Childhood Cancer International Survivors Network in Dublin on October 2016 (see Annex 1)