13 research outputs found

    A new ruthenium cyclopentadienyl azole compound with activity on tumor cell lines and trypanosomatid parasites

    No full text
    <div><p>As part of our efforts to develop organometallic ruthenium compounds bearing activity on both trypanosomatid parasites and tumor cells, a new Ru(II)–cyclopentadienyl clotrimazole complex, [RuCp(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CTZ)](CF<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>), where Cp = cyclopentadienyl, CTZ = clotrimazole, was synthesized and characterized. The compound was evaluated <i>in vitro</i> on <i>T. cruzi</i> (Y strain), the infective form of <i>T. brucei brucei</i> strain 427 (cell line 449), on three human tumor cell lines with different sensitivity to cisplatin (A2780, ovary; MCF7, breast; HeLa, cervix) and on J774 murine macrophages as mammalian cell model. The new compound is more cytotoxic on <i>T. cruzi</i> and on the tumor cell lines than the reference drugs (Nifurtimox and cisplatin, respectively). In addition, complexation of the bioactive CTZ to the {RuCp(PPh<sub>3</sub>)} moiety leads to significant increase of the antiparasitic and antitumoral activity. To get insight into the potential “dual” mechanism of antiparasitic action emerging from the presence of Ru(II) and CTZ in a single molecule, the inhibitory effect of this new complex on the biosynthesis of <i>T. cruzi</i> sterols of membrane and the interaction with DNA were studied. Although the tested complex does not affect DNA, it affects the <i>T. cruzi</i> biosynthetic pathway of conversion of squalene to squalene oxide. According to the results reported here, [RuCp(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CTZ)][CF<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>] could be considered a prospective antiparasitic and/or antitumoral agent that deserves further evaluation.</p></div

    Screening of TGR inhibitors.

    No full text
    <p>The % of inhibition of TR activity of <i>E. granulosus</i> TGR for each compound is shown (compound structures can be found in <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035033#pone.0035033.s002" target="_blank">Table S1</a></b>). The screening was carried out with 10 µM inhibitors, except for those marked with an asterisk, which were assayed at 1 µM (these compounds showed non-constant baselines at 10 µM in control experiments without enzyme). A 1 nM TGR was used in all cases. <b>a.</b> Oxadiazole <i>N</i>-oxides, <b>b.</b> Benzofuroxans, <b>c.</b> Thiadiazoles, <b>d.</b> Various compound families: quinoxalines (<b>61</b>, <b>62</b> and <b>65</b>), nitrooxy (<b>64</b>) and oxathiazole (<b>63</b>).</p

    Characteristics of active and inactive compounds.

    No full text
    a<p>Highest occupied molecular orbital energy.</p>b<p>Lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy.</p>c<p>HOMO-LUMO energy gap.</p>d<p>Octanol/water partition coefficient using Ghose-Crippen method.</p>e<p>Solvation energy using Truhlar model SM5.4.</p>f<p>Dipolar moment.</p

    Effect of preincubation time on TR activity inhibition of TGR.

    No full text
    (*)<p>1.5 µM of compound 1 was incubated with 1 nM enzyme in the presence of NADPH and the reaction started by the addition of DTNB. Control experiments without inhibitors were carried out in parallel to determine the corresponding v<sub>o</sub> (initial velocities without inhibitors).</p

    <i>E. granulosus</i> protoscolex viability <i>in vitro</i> after 48 h incubation with TGR inhibitors at different concentrations.

    No full text
    <p>ND: not determined (since no effect was observed at the highest concentration). <b>42</b> (benzofuroxan control) and <b>19</b> (oxadiazole <i>N</i>-oxide control). A control with vehicle alone (DMSO) was also included and did not affect protoscolex viability.</p>(*)<p>% of inhibition of TR activity at 1 µM not at 10 µM.</p
    corecore