P2807Clinical outcomes with cobalt chromium biolimus eluting drug-eluting stents compared with stainless steel biolimus eluting drug-eluting stents in all-comers patients

AimsThinner stent struts may improve deliverability, conformability and reduce vessel injury. We report the first clinical outcomes of the thinner strut (84–88um) cobalt chromium biolimus eluting stent from the Biomatrix Alpha registry and compare these with objective performance criteria from the stainless steel BioMatrix Flex arm of the Leaders study.MethodsA total of 1257 patients were studied: 400 patients from 12 centres receiving ≥1 Biomatrix Alpha stent were prospectively enrolled into the Biomatrix Alpha registry and then underwent a pre-specified comparison with 857 patients who received a Biomatrix Flex stent in the Leaders study. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 9 months. Assuming a 9.2% event rate with BioMatrix Flex, a one-sided type I error (α) of 0.05, and a 4% non-inferiority margin, a sample size of 400 in the Biomatrix alpha registry had >80% power to conclude non-inferiority.ResultsBaseline characteristics in the Alpha registry were typical of an all-comers population with a mean age of 64.7±11.3, diabetes 19%, current smoking 21%, dyslipidemia 57%, hypertension 57%, total stent length per lesion 25.49±13.45, mean stents per procedure 1.59±0.88 and overlapping stents in 13.4%. Observed MACE at 9 months with Alpha was 3.94% (upper limit 5.98%) vs. 9.28% MACE rate with Flex stents in Leaders, which met pre-specified criteria for non-inferiority (p<0.001) and on post hoc testing for superiority yielded p<0.001 for Alpha vs Flex. Secondary endpoints with Alpha included clinically-driven TVR 2.6%, all-cause mortality rate 1.51% and definite/probable stent thrombosis 0.25%.While both Alpha and Leaders enrolled all-comers, Alpha included longer total stent length per lesion (25.49 vs 23.85mm, p<0.001) and more stents per procedure (mean 1.59 vs 1.34; p<0.001) but fewer patients with diabetes (19% vs 26%; p=0.0087), dyslipidemia (57 vs 65%; p=0.0037), prior MI (18.8% vs 32.2%; p<0.001) or acute coronary syndrome (41% vs 55%; p<0.001). To correct for these imbalances and to assess robustness further, a propensity score at the patient level data was undertaken (total sample size of 1257 patients; 400 from the Alpha registry and 857 from the LEADERS study). A propensity score stratification method was used obtaining 5 quintiles for adjusted analysis (each of the 5, containing 251 or 252 patients, 20%). In each of the strata as well as at the aggregate level, a p valve<0.005 was obtained confirming non-inferiority for the primary endpoint.ConclusionThe thinner strut (84–88um) cobalt chromium Biomatrix Alpha stent demonstrated low MACE rates at 9 months which were non-inferior to MACE outcomes with the stainless steel Biomatrix Flex in the Leaders study. The robustness of this finding was further confirmed by a propensity score analysis

Bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stents with 4-month dual antiplatelet therapy versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents with 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with left main coronary artery disease:: the IDEAL-LM randomised trial

Background: Improvements in drug-eluting stent design have led to a reduced frequency of repeat revascularisation and new biodegradable polymer coatings may allow a shorter duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aims: The Improved Drug-Eluting stent for All-comers Left Main (IDEAL-LM) study aims to investigate long-term clinical outcomes after implantation of a biodegradable polymer platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (BP-PtCr-EES) followed by 4 months DAPT compared to a durable polymer cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (DP-CoCr-EES) followed by 12 months DAPT in patients undergoing PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Methods: This is a multicentre randomised clinical trial study in patients with an indication for coronary artery revascularisation who have been accepted for PCI for LMCA disease after Heart Team consultation. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the BP-PtCr-EES or the DP-CoCr-EES. The primary endpoint was a non-inferiority comparison of the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation at 2 years. Results: Between December 2014 and October 2016, 818 patients (410 BP-PtCr-EES and 408 DP-CoCr-EES) were enrolled at 29 centres in Europe. At 2 years, the primary endpoint of MACE occurred in 59 patients (14.6%) in the BP-PtCr-EES group and 45 patients (11.4%) in the DP-CoCr-EES group; 1-sided upper 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.18%; p=0.04 for non-inferiority; p=0.17 for superiority. The secondary endpoint event of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 11 patients (2.7%) in the BP-PtCr-EES group and 2 patients (0.5%) in the DP-CoCr-EES group (p=0.02). Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCI of LMCA disease, after two years of follow-up, the use of a BP-PtCr-EES with 4 months of DAPT was non-inferior to a DP-CoCr-EES with 12 months of DAPT with respect to the composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction or ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation