Chemotherapy-associated thromboembolic risk in cancer outpatients and effect of nadroparin thromboprophylaxis: results of a retrospective analysis of the PROTECHT study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are at increased risk of thrombosis. Nadroparin has been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of venous and arterial thrombotic events (TEs) by about 50% in cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy. The aims of this retrospective analysis were to evaluate the thromboembolic risk and the benefit of thromboprophylaxis according to type of chemotherapy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Cancer outpatients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of nadroparin or placebo. The incidence of symptomatic TEs was assessed according to the type of chemotherapy. Results were reported as risk ratios with associated 95% CI and two-tailed probability values.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>769 and 381 patients have been evaluated in the nadroparin and placebo group, respectively. In the absence of thromboprophylaxis, the highest rate of TEs was found in patients receiving gemcitabine- (8.1%) or cisplatin-based chemotherapy (7.0%). The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin increased the risk to 10.2%. Thromboprophylaxis reduced TE risk by 68% in patients receiving gemcitabine; with a further decrease to 78% in those receiving a combination of gemcitabine and platinum.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This retrospective analysis confirms that patients undergoing chemotherapy including gemcitabine, platinum analogues or their combination are at higher risk of TEs. Our results also suggest that outpatients receiving chemotherapy regimens including these agents might achieve an increased benefit from thromboprophylaxis with nadroparin. Clinical Trial registration number: <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00951574">NCT 00951574</a></p

Pros and cons of new oral anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Patients with cancer account for 20 % of cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Cancer patients are at increased risk for VTE during the entire course of their disease, also in absence of traditional VTE risk factors. Furthermore, patients with VTE and cancer have an estimated risk of bleeding of 15-20 % per year while on anticoagulant treatment. For these reasons, treatment of acute VTE in patients with cancer remains a clinical challenge. In clinical studies, which included about 27,000 patients, new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown to be as effective and safe as conventional anticoagulation (heparin given with and followed by vitamin K antagonists) for the treatment of VTE. In these studies, 1227 patients with active cancer were enrolled. Preliminary results of subgroup analyses and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials suggest that NOACs could represent an alternative to conventional anticoagulation in patients with active cancer. Further "ad hoc" studies evaluating the clinical benefit of treatment with NOACs in patients with VTE and cancer are neede

Long-term death and recurrence in patients with acute venous thromboembolism: The MASTER registry

Background: The long-term clinical outcome of VTE has been essentially assessed in cohorts of selected patients. The aim of this multicenter registry was to prospectively assess the long-term clinical outcome in a cohort of unselected patients with objectively confirmed acute VTE. Materials and Methods: Death and VTE recurrence at 24 months were the main study outcomes. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed according to the Kaplan-Meyer and Cox proportional hazard model, respectively. Results: 2119 patients with acute VTE were included in the registry: 1541 (72.7%) with deep vein thrombosis, 206 (9.7%) with pulmonary embolism and 372 (17.6%) with both. Information about death was available in 2021 patients (95.4%) and about recurrence in 1988 patients (93.8%). 167 patients (4.55% patient-year) died during follow-up. After adjusting for age, cancer (Hazard ratio [HR]: 7.2; 95%CI 4.8-10.8), long-term heparin treatment (HR: 2.5; 95%CI 1.8-3.5), in-hospital management of VTE (HR: 2.0; 95%CI 1.3-3.0), and ileo-caval thrombosis (HR: 1.7; 95%CI 1.2-2.4) were found to be independent predictors of death. 124 (3.63% patient-year) patients had a VTE recurrence during follow-up. In-hospital management of VTE (HR: 1.8; 95%CI 1.2-2.9), male gender (HR: 1.7; 95%CI 1.2-2.4) were independent risk factors for recurrent VTE. Cancer (HR: 1.6; 95%CI 1.0-2.8) showed a trend for increased risk of VTE recurrence (p = 0.056). The reported rate of major bleeding was 2.5%. Conclusions: In a large cohort of unselected VTE patients, cancer, ileo-caval thrombosis, long-term heparin treatment and in-hospital management were associated with increased mortality during long-term follow-up. In-hospital management, male gender were associated with an increased risk of VTE recurrence. \ua9 2012 Elsevier Ltd

Data on the use of oral anticoagulants in nonagenarians with atrial fibrillation

The data presented in this article are related to the research article entitled “Patients aged 90 years or older with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants: A multicentre observational study” [1]. This article unveils original data of a cohort of 546 patients aged 90 years or older with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants. Here, we describe the time course of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and of major bleeding according to the presence of outcome predictors and report the causes of permanent discontinuation and of death. Furthermore, we report data on the incidence of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, of major bleeding, of permanent discontinuation and of all-cause death comparing i) oral anticoagulant naïve users vs. long-term oral anticoagulant users, ii) patients on anticoagulant therapy for less than 2 years (new users) vs. patients on anticoagulant therapy for more than 2 years. The material of this data article provides a better understanding on the use of oral anticoagulants in this fragile population and facilitates further critical analysis. Moreover, it aims at highlighting the importance of increasing knowledge in patients aged 90 years or older. These patients are often excluded from or under-represented in clinical trials and cohort studies

A prospective study on survival in cancer patients with and without venous thromboembolism

Retrospective population-based studies showed that in cancer patients venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with reduced survival. Master Oncology is a multicenter study in patients with solid advanced cancer aimed at assessing (1) risk factors for VTE using a case-control design, and (2) survival in cases (patients with VTE) and controls (patients without VTE). Survival data were prospectively collected for at least 10 months. Overall, 237 cases and 339 controls were included in the analysis. The following factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of VTE: body mass index (BMI; OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.31-3.12 for 6526 vs. <23 kg/m(2)), ECOG score (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.47-3.11 for grade 1, and 3.32; 95% CI 1.64-6.00 for grade 2-3, compared to grade 0) and recent diagnosis of cancer (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.33-2.71 for <12 vs. 6512 months). After an average prospective observation of 8.3 months, 136 cases (57.4%) and 127 controls (37.5%) died with a median survival of 8.7 (95% CI 7.5-10.9) and 14.3 months (95% CI 12.2-18.7), respectively, (Wilcoxon = 27.72, p < 0.001; multivariate hazard ratio 1.55; 95% CI 1.21-2.00). Median survival time was reduced for both patients with symptomatic (Wilcoxon = 35.22, p < 0.001) and asymptomatic VTE (Wilcoxon = 4.63, p = 0.031). Patients with advanced solid cancer, high BMI, high ECOG score, and recent diagnosis of cancer are associated with an increased risk for VTE. Patients with both symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE have a reduced survival compared to those without VTE