Optimised Motion Tracking for Positron Emission Tomography Studies of Brain Function in Awake Rats

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a non-invasive molecular imaging technique using positron-emitting radioisotopes to study functional processes within the body. High resolution PET scanners designed for imaging rodents and non-human primates are now commonplace in preclinical research. Brain imaging in this context, with motion compensation, can potentially enhance the usefulness of PET by avoiding confounds due to anaesthetic drugs and enabling freely moving animals to be imaged during normal and evoked behaviours. Due to the frequent and rapid motion exhibited by alert, awake animals, optimal motion correction requires frequently sampled pose information and precise synchronisation of these data with events in the PET coincidence data stream. Motion measurements should also be as accurate as possible to avoid degrading the excellent spatial resolution provided by state-of-the-art scanners. Here we describe and validate methods for optimised motion tracking suited to the correction of motion in awake rats. A hardware based synchronisation approach is used to achieve temporal alignment of tracker and scanner data to within 10 ms. We explored the impact of motion tracker synchronisation error, pose sampling rate, rate of motion, and marker size on motion correction accuracy. With accurate synchronisation (<100 ms error), a sampling rate of >20 Hz, and a small head marker suitable for awake animal studies, excellent motion correction results were obtained in phantom studies with a variety of continuous motion patterns, including realistic rat motion (<5% bias in mean concentration). Feasibility of the approach was also demonstrated in an awake rat study. We conclude that motion tracking parameters needed for effective motion correction in preclinical brain imaging of awake rats are achievable in the laboratory setting. This could broaden the scope of animal experiments currently possible with PET

Pompe disease diagnosis and management guideline

ACMG standards and guidelines are designed primarily as an educational resource for physicians and other health care providers to help them provide quality medical genetic services. Adherence to these standards and guidelines does not necessarily ensure a successful medical outcome. These standards and guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. in determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the geneticist should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. It may be prudent, however, to document in the patient's record the rationale for any significant deviation from these standards and guidelines.Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27706 USAOregon Hlth Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USANYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USAUniv Florida, Coll Med, Powell Gene Therapy Ctr, Gainesville, FL 32611 USAIndiana Univ, Bloomington, in 47405 USAUniv Miami, Miller Sch Med, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USAHarvard Univ, Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilColumbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USANYU, Bellevue Hosp, Sch Med, New York, NY USAColumbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10027 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Markerless motion estimation for motion-compensated clinical brain imaging

Motion-compensated brain imaging can dramatically reduce the artifacts and quantitative degradation associated with voluntary and involuntary subject head motion during positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT). However, motion-compensated imaging protocols are not in widespread clinical use for these modalities. A key reason for this seems to be the lack of a practical motion tracking technology that allows for smooth and reliable integration of motion-compensated imaging protocols in the clinical setting. We seek to address this problem by investigating the feasibility of a highly versatile optical motion tracking method for PET, SPECT and CT geometries. The method requires no attached markers, relying exclusively on the detection and matching of distinctive facial features. We studied the accuracy of this method in 16 volunteers in a mock imaging scenario by comparing the estimated motion with an accurate marker-based method used in applications such as image guided surgery. A range of techniques to optimize performance of the method were also studied. Our results show that the markerless motion tracking method is highly accurate (<2 mm discrepancy against a benchmarking system) on an ethnically diverse range of subjects and, moreover, exhibits lower jitter and estimation of motion over a greater range than some marker-based methods. Our optimization tests indicate that the basic pose estimation algorithm is very robust but generally benefits from rudimentary background masking. Further marginal gains in accuracy can be achieved by accounting for non-rigid motion of features. Efficiency gains can be achieved by capping the number of features used for pose estimation provided that these features adequately sample the range of head motion encountered in the study. These proof-of-principle data suggest that markerless motion tracking is amenable to motion-compensated brain imaging and holds good promise for a practical implementation in clinical PET, SPECT and CT systems

An optical tracking system for motion correction in small animal PET

Imaging conscious animals in small animal positron emission tomography (PET) presents a significant challenge, and some form of motion compensation will normally be necessary. In this work, a commercial optical motion tracker called the Micron Tracker has been adapted to the microPET system for this purpose. We evaluated marker size limits, performed a spatial calibration for the devices, developed a synchronization method, and carried out a phantom study involving multiple, discrete 3D movements to test key components of the motion tracking system. We have demonstrated that small and lightweight markers (approx. 15mm x 18mm) are feasible with this system for 3D motion tracking, Calibration accuracy was 0.46mm RMS.Synchronization of the data streams was achieved with a precision of approximately 20ms. Moreover, a marked reduction in motion artifacts was demonstrated in the phantom study. The techniques and results presented here demonstrate the feasibility of adapting the Micron Tracker to the microPET environment for motion tracking of small laboratory animals. There is scope to improve on limitations in synchronization and further optimize marker design to achieve better pose accuracy and precision

Event-based motion correction for PET transmission measurements with a rotating point source

Accurate attenuation correction is important for quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) studies. When performing transmission measurements using an external rotating radioactive source, object motion during the transmission scan can distort the attenuation correction factors computed as the ratio of the blank to transmission counts, and cause errors and artefacts in reconstructed PET images. In this paper we report a compensation method for rigid body motion during PET transmission measurements, in which list mode transmission data are motion corrected event-by-event, based on known motion, to ensure that all events which traverse the same path through the object are recorded on a common line of response (LOR). As a result, the motion-corrected transmission LOR may record a combination of events originally detected on different LORs. To ensure that the corresponding blank LOR records events from the same combination of contributing LORs, the list mode blank data are spatially transformed event-by-event based on the same motion information.The number of counts recorded on the resulting blank LOR is then equivalent to the number of counts that would have been recorded on the corresponding motion-corrected transmission LOR in the absence of any attenuating object. The proposed method has been verified in phantom studies with both stepwise movements and continuous motion. We found that attenuation maps derived from motion-corrected transmission and blank data agree well with those of the stationary phantom and are significantly better than uncorrected attenuation data

Silhouette-Based Markerless Motion Estimation of Awake Rodents in PET

The ability to image the brain of a freely moving rodent using motion-compensated PET presents many exciting possibilities for exploring the links between brain function and behavior. Markerless optical approaches for pose estimation have several potential advantages over marker-based methods: improved accuracy and increased range of detectable motion; no 'decoupling' of marker and head motion; and no acclimatization of the animals to attached markers. Our aim in this work was to describe and validate a silhouette-based multi-camera method for estimating the pose of a rat. Random-walk and K-means clustering approaches were very adaptable to uneven lighting and generally provided excellent object segmentations. In obtaining a high quality rat model, shape-from-silhouette and laser scanning both resulted in useful models; laser scanning provided sub-millimeter resolution with very few artifacts and was the method of choice. In our experimental validation, the 3D-2D (model-silhouette) optimization clearly converged to sub-degree and sub-millimeter alignment of the measured and estimated silhouettes. The average discrepancy between test points transformed using the estimated versus ground-truth poses was 0.94 mm ± 0.51 mm. This investigation focused on rigid motion of a rat phantom as a proof-of-principle of the technique. Future work will focus on investigating the potential of designing a non-rigid rodent body model in order to apply the method to a freely moving animal during PET imaging