56 research outputs found

    In vitro study on the schedule-dependency of the interaction between pemetrexed, gemcitabine and irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer cells

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Based on their different mechanisms of action, non-overlapping side effects and radiosensitising potential, combining the antimetabolites pemetrexed (multitargeted antifolate, MTA) and gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC) with irradiation (RT) seems promising. This <it>in vitro </it>study, for the first time, presents the triple combination of MTA, dFdC and irradiation using various treatment schedules.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The cytotoxicity, radiosensitising potential and cell cycle effect of MTA were investigated in A549 (NSCLC) and CAL-27 (SCCHN) cells. Using simultaneous or sequential exposure schedules, the cytotoxicity and radiosensitising effect of 24 h MTA combined with 1 h or 24 h dFdC were analysed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Including a time interval between MTA exposure and irradiation seemed favourable to MTA immediately preceding or following radiotherapy. MTA induced a significant S phase accumulation that persisted for more than 8 h after drug removal. Among different MTA/dFdC combinations tested, the highest synergistic interaction was produced by 24 h MTA followed by 1 h dFdC. Combined with irradiation, this schedule showed a clear radiosensitising effect.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Results from our <it>in vitro </it>model suggest that the sequence 24 h MTA → 1 h dFdC → RT is the most rational design and would, after confirmation in an <it>in vivo </it>setting, possibly provide the greatest benefit in the clinic.</p

    THE NETHERLANDS: Controversy or consensus?

    No full text
    • …
    corecore