OCP acquires FTTH player

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we highlight the most important cellular and molecular mechanisms that contribute to cardiac inflammation and fibrosis. We also discuss the interplay between inflammation and fibrosis in various precursors of heart failure (HF) and how such mechanisms can contribute to myocardial tissue remodelling and development of HF. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, many research articles attempt to elucidate different aspects of the interplay between inflammation and fibrosis. Cardiac inflammation and fibrosis are major pathophysiological mechanisms operating in the failing heart, regardless of HF aetiology. Currently, novel therapeutic options are available or are being developed to treat HF and these are discussed in this review. A progressive disease needs an aggressive management; however, existing therapies against HF are insufficient. There is a dynamic interplay between inflammation and fibrosis in various precursors of HF such as myocardial infarction (MI), myocarditis and hypertension, and also in HF itself. There is an urgent need to identify novel therapeutic targets and develop advanced therapeutic strategies to combat the syndrome of HF. Understanding and describing the elements of the inflammatory and fibrotic pathways are essential, and specific drugs that target these pathways need to be evaluated

Cancer and heart disease:associations and relations

Emerging evidence supports that cancer incidence is increased in patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease and heart failure (HF), and patients with HF frequently die from cancer. Recently, data have been generated showing that circulating factors in relation to HF promote tumour growth and development in murine models, providing proof that a causal relationship exists between both diseases. Several common pathophysiological mechanisms linking HF to cancer exist, and include inflammation, neuro-hormonal activation, oxidative stress and a dysfunctional immune system. These shared mechanisms, in combination with risk factors, in concert may explain why patients with HF are prone to develop cancer. Investigating the new insights linking HF with cancer is rapidly becoming an exciting new field of research, and we herein review the most recent data. Besides insights in mechanisms, we call for clinical awareness, that is essential to optimize treatment strategies of patients having developed cancer with a history of HF. Finally, ongoing and future trials should strive for comprehensive phenotyping of both CV and cancer end points, to allow optimal usefulness of data, and to better describe and understand common characteristics of these two lethal diseases

The role of immune checkpoints in cardiovascular disease

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are monoclonal antibodies which bind to immune checkpoints (IC) and their ligands to prevent inhibition of T-cell activation by tumor cells. Currently, multiple ICI are approved targeting Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), Programmed Death Protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1, and Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3). This therapy has provided potent anti-tumor effects and improved prognosis for many cancer patients. However, due to systemic effects, patients can develop immune related adverse events (irAE), including possible life threatening cardiovascular irAE, like atherosclerosis, myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. Inhibition of vascular IC is associated with increased atherosclerotic burden and plaque instability. IC protect against atherosclerosis by inhibiting T-cell activity and cytokine production, promoting regulatory T-cell differentiation and inducing T-cell exhaustion. In addition, PD-L1 on endothelial cells might promote plaque stability by reducing apoptosis and increasing expression of tight junction molecules. In the heart, IC downregulate the immune response to protect against cardiac injury by reducing T-cell activity and migration. Here, inhibition of IC could induce life-threatening T-cell-mediated-myocarditis. One proposed purpose behind lymphocyte infiltration is reaction to cardiac antigens, caused by decreased self-tolerance, and thereby increased autoimmunity because of IC inhibition. In addition, there are several reports of ICI-mediated cardiomyopathy with immunoglobulin G expression on cardiomyocytes, indicating an autoimmune response. IC are mostly known due to their cardiotoxicity. However, t his review compiles current knowledge on mechanisms behind IC function in cardiovascular disease with the aim of providing an overview of possible therapeutic targets in prevention or treatment of cardiovascular irAEs

HE4 Serum Levels Are Associated with Heart Failure Severity in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

AbstractBackgroundThe novel biomarker human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) shows prognostic value in acute heart failure (HF) patients. We measured HE4 levels in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and correlated them to HF severity, kidney function, and HF biomarkers, and determined its predictive value.MethodsSerum HE4 levels in patients (n = 101) with stable CHF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <45%) from the Vitamin D CHF (VitD-CHF) study (NCT01092130) were compared with those in age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects (n = 58) from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-Stage Disease (PREVEND) study.ResultsHE4 levels were higher in CHF compared with control subjects (69.2 pmol/L [interquartile range 55.6-93.8] vs 56.1 pmol/L [46.6-69.0]; P < .001) and were higher with increasing New York Heart Association functional class. Levels were associated with HF risk factors, including age, gender, diabetes, smoking and N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). HE4 demonstrated strong associations with kidney function and HF fibrosis biomarkers. In a multivariable model, we identified creatinine, NT-proBNP, galectin-3, high-sensitive troponin T, and smoking as factors associated with HE4. Independently from these factors, HE4 levels predicted death and HF rehospitalization (5-year follow-up, hazard ratio 3.8; confidence interval 1.31–11.1; P = .014).ConclusionsHE4 levels are increased in CHF, correlate with HF severity and kidney function, and predict HF outcome

Galectin-3 Activation and Inhibition in Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Disease:An Update

Galectin-3 is a versatile protein orchestrating several physiological and pathophysiological processes in the human body. In the last decade, considerable interest in galectin-3 has emerged because of its potential role as a biotarget. Galectin-3 is differentially expressed depending on the tissue type, however its expression can be induced under conditions of tissue injury or stress. Galectin-3 overexpression and secretion is associated with several diseases and is extensively studied in the context of fibrosis, heart failure, atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus. Monomeric (extracellular) galectin-3 usually undergoes further "activation" which significantly broadens the spectrum of biological activity mainly by modifying its carbohydrate-binding properties. Self-interactions of this protein appear to play a crucial role in regulating the extracellular activities of this protein, however there is limited and controversial data on the mechanisms involved. We therefore summarize (recent) literature in this area and describe galectin-3 from a binding perspective providing novel insights into mechanisms by which galectin-3 is known to be "activated" and how such activation may be regulated in pathophysiological scenarios

Kidney Function in Patients With Neuromuscular Disease:Creatinine Versus Cystatin C

Background: Accurate measurement of kidney function in patients with neuromuscular disorders is challenging. Cystatin C, a marker not influenced by skeletal muscle degradation, might be of clinical value in these patients.Methods: We consecutively enrolled 39 patients with neuromuscular disorders. We investigated the association of the eGFR, based on plasma creatinine and Cystatin C, with clinical and biochemical variables associated with kidney function, namely age and galectin-3.Results: Creatinine-based eGFR was 242 (±80) and Cystatin C-based eGFR was 110 (±23) mL/min/1.73 m2. Cystatin C-based eGFR was associated with age (β −0.63 p &lt; 0.0001) and galectin-3 levels (β −0.43 p &lt; 0.01), while creatinine-based eGFR was not (β −0.22 p = 0.20; β −0.28 p = 0.10). Sensitivity analyses in Duchenne and Becker patients revealed the same results: Cystatin C-based eGFR was associated with age (β −0.61 p &lt; 0.01) and galectin-3 levels (β −0.43 p = 0.05), while creatinine-based eGFR was not (β −0.32 p = 0.13; β −0.34 p = 0.14).Conclusions: These data indicate that estimation of renal function in patients with neuromuscular disorders cannot reliably be achieved with creatinine, while Cystatin C appears a reasonable alternative. Since a large proportion of patients with neuromuscular disorders develops heart failure, and requires heart failure medication, adequate monitoring of renal function is warranted

Established Tumour Biomarkers Predict Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in the General Population

Introduction: Several lines of evidence reveal that cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer share similar common pathological milieus. The prevalence of the two diseases is growing as the population ages and the burden of shared risk factors increases. In this respect, we hypothesise that tumour biomarkers can be potential predictors of CVD outcomes in the general population. Methods: We measured six tumour biomarkers (AFP, CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CEA and CYFRA 21-1) and determined their predictive value for CVD in the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease (PREVEND) study. A total of 8,592 subjects were enrolled in the study. Results: The levels of CEA significantly predicted CV morbidity and mortality, with hazard ratios (HRs) of HR 1.28 (95% CI 1.08–1.53), respectively. Two biomarkers (CA15-3 and CEA) showed statistical significance in predicting all-cause mortality, with HRs 1.58 (95% CI 1.18–2.12) and HR 1.60 (95% CI 1.30–1.96), when adjusted for shared risk factors and prevalent CVD. Furthermore, biomarkers seem to be sex specific. CYFRA 21-1 presented as an independent predictor of CV morbidity and mortality in female, but not in male gender, with HR 1.82 (95% CI 1.40–2.35). When it comes to all-cause mortality, both CYFRA and CEA show statistical significance in male gender, with HR 1.64 (95% CI 1.28–3.12) and HR 1.55 (95% CI 1.18–2.02), while only CEA showed statistical significance in female gender, with HR 1.64 (95% CI 1.20–2.24). Lastly, CA15-3 and CEA strongly predicted CV mortality with HR 3.01 (95% CI 1.70–5.32) and HR 1.82 (95% CI 1.30–2.56). On another hand, CA 15-3 also presented as an independent predictor of heart failure (HF) with HR 1.67 (95% CI 1.15–2.42). Conclusion: Several tumour biomarkers demonstrated independent prognostic value for CV events and all-cause mortality in a large cohort from the general population. These findings support the notion that CVD and cancer are associated with similar pathological milieus