The comparison of MPO activity in each group.

<p>The MPO activity in the sham group was relatively lower, while the MPO activity in MI/R group was significantly increased, which was blocked by etanercept. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group). *<i>P</i><0.05 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p

Effect of etanercept on TLR4 gene expression in the ischemia area in the heart subjected to MI/R.

<p>Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group). *<i>P</i><0.05 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p

Effect of etanercept on the myocardial infarction area induced by MI/R.

<p>Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group). *<i>P</i><0.01 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p

The comparison of CK and cTnI activity in each group.

<p>The CK and cTnI activity in the sham group was relatively lower, while the CK and cTnI activity in MI/R group was significantly increased, which was inhibited by etanercept. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group). *<i>P</i><0.05 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p

Effect of etanercept on NF-κB expression in the ischemia area in the heart subjected to MI/R.

<p>(A) Representative immunoblots of samples from rat ventricles subjected to different treatment groups. (B) Quantitative densitometric analysis of NF-κB protein with β-actin as an internal standard. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group). *<i>P</i><0.05 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p

The comparison of levels of TNF-α in myocardium and serum in each group.

<p>Compared with the MI/R group, etanercept reduced TNF-α level significantly. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group). *<i>P</i><0.05 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p

Effect of etanercept on cardiomyocyte apoptosis induced by MI/R.

<p>(A) TUNEL staining. (B) Quantitative analysis of percentage of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group). *<i>P</i><0.05 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p

The comparison of LDH activity in each group.

<p>The LDH activity in the sham group was relatively lower, while the LDH activity in MI/R group was significantly increased, which was inhibited by etanercept. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group). *<i>P</i><0.05 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p

Immunohistochemical analysis of myocardial TLR4 expression.

<p>TLR4 is brown staining. Sham, sham group; MI/R, MI/R group; MI/R+Eta, MI/R+ etanercept group. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group).*<i>P</i><0.05 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p

Effect of etanercept on cardiac function.

<p>(A) The effect of etanercept on LVEF. (B) The effect of etanercept on LVEDP. (C) The effect of etanercept on –dp/dx max. (D) The effect of etanercept on +dp/dx max. LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction; LVEDP, left ventricle end-diastolic pressure. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 in each group). *<i>P</i><0.01 versus the sham group, ^#<i>P</i><0.05 versus MI/R group.</p