Fees, performance and risk of Islamic and conventional investment funds : A theoretical and empirical approach

Les fonds d'investissement islamiques et conventionnels se retrouvent dans la mesure où ils ont la même finalité. En revanche, à la différence des fonds conventionnels, les fonds islamiques se doivent d'investir conformément à un ensemble de règles de sélection. Cette thèse s'intéresse à élaborer un cadre d'analyse théorique et empirique permettant d'expliquer les frais de gestion, ainsi que la performance et le risque des fonds d'investissement. Ainsi, ce travail commence par élaborer une analyse théorique autour des contrats de partage des pertes et des profits (venture contracts) confrontés aux problèmes d'asymétrie d'information. Un modèle théorique, en présence de problème de sélection adverse entre le gérant et l'apporteur de fonds, montre que les degrés d'aversion au risque respectifs du gérant et de l'investisseur ont un impact sur la négociation des frais de gestion indexés sur la performance périodique du fonds (carried interest). Les conclusions de ce modèle nous incitent à expliquer empiriquement le choix des partenaires du fonds concernant les clauses de rémunération, la performance et le risque des fonds d'investissement. Pour ce faire, nous élaborons une base de données unique qui comporte un échantillon international de fonds islamiques et conventionnels regroupés par société de gestion. En distinguant les fonds islamiques des fonds conventionnels, le cadre légal, les conditions politiques et économiques expliquent leurs frais, leurs performances et leurs risques.Islamic and conventional investment funds have the same purpose. However, unlike conventional funds, Islamic funds offer different investment contracts and have to invest in accordance with a set of selection rules. This dissertation focuses on developing theoretical and empirical analysis framework to explain the fixed and performance fees, the performance and the risk of investment funds. Thus, we begin by developing a theoretical analysis about profit and loss-Sharing contracts (venture capital) that face agency problems. Based on this theoretical framework, a theoretical model, in the presence of adverse selection problem between the fund manager and the investor, shows that the risk aversions of the fund manager and the investor have respectively an impact on the periodic performance fees (carried interest) during the bargaining stage. The conclusions of this model lead us to empirically explain the terms of compensation and profit-Sharing, the performance and the risk of funds. To achieve our objective, we create a unique database that has an international sample of Islamic and conventional funds grouped by management company. By distinguishing between Islamic and conventional funds, the legal, political and economic conditions explain their fees, performance and risk

The Differential Effects of Law, Culture and Political Risk on Fees, Performance and Risk-Taking Behavior of Islamic and Conventional Funds

This paper considers an international sample of conventional and Islamic mutual funds to assess whether law, culture, and political risk affect the performance, risk-taking behavior and compensation fees of mutual funds. Overall, the results show strongly that legal conditions, culture, and political risk have robust differential effects on fees, performance and risk-taking behavior of Islamic funds and conventional funds. We find that Islamic mutual funds in countries with higher legal conditions receive lower fees, whereas conventional funds receive higher carried interest, lower fixed management fees and weaker expense ratio. In such conditions, conventional and Islamic fund managers have lower performance and take higher specific and systematic risk. Overall, Hoefsted culture’s measures affect significantly the fees structure, performance and risk-taking behavior with robust differential effects on Islamic and conventional funds. Focusing on political risk effects, we show that, in countries with higher political risk, carried interest and performance will be higher, whereas the specific and systematic risk will be stronger for Islamic and conventional funds. The components of country legality and political risk Index have significant differential effects on Islamic and conventional funds’ characteristics

Fees, performance and risk of Islamic and conventional investment funds : A theoretical and empirical approach

Les fonds d'investissement islamiques et conventionnels se retrouvent dans la mesure où ils ont la même finalité. En revanche, à la différence des fonds conventionnels, les fonds islamiques se doivent d'investir conformément à un ensemble de règles de sélection. Cette thèse s'intéresse à élaborer un cadre d'analyse théorique et empirique permettant d'expliquer les frais de gestion, ainsi que la performance et le risque des fonds d'investissement. Ainsi, ce travail commence par élaborer une analyse théorique autour des contrats de partage des pertes et des profits (venture contracts) confrontés aux problèmes d'asymétrie d'information. Un modèle théorique, en présence de problème de sélection adverse entre le gérant et l'apporteur de fonds, montre que les degrés d'aversion au risque respectifs du gérant et de l'investisseur ont un impact sur la négociation des frais de gestion indexés sur la performance périodique du fonds (carried interest). Les conclusions de ce modèle nous incitent à expliquer empiriquement le choix des partenaires du fonds concernant les clauses de rémunération, la performance et le risque des fonds d'investissement. Pour ce faire, nous élaborons une base de données unique qui comporte un échantillon international de fonds islamiques et conventionnels regroupés par société de gestion. En distinguant les fonds islamiques des fonds conventionnels, le cadre légal, les conditions politiques et économiques expliquent leurs frais, leurs performances et leurs risques.Islamic and conventional investment funds have the same purpose. However, unlike conventional funds, Islamic funds offer different investment contracts and have to invest in accordance with a set of selection rules. This dissertation focuses on developing theoretical and empirical analysis framework to explain the fixed and performance fees, the performance and the risk of investment funds. Thus, we begin by developing a theoretical analysis about profit and loss-Sharing contracts (venture capital) that face agency problems. Based on this theoretical framework, a theoretical model, in the presence of adverse selection problem between the fund manager and the investor, shows that the risk aversions of the fund manager and the investor have respectively an impact on the periodic performance fees (carried interest) during the bargaining stage. The conclusions of this model lead us to empirically explain the terms of compensation and profit-Sharing, the performance and the risk of funds. To achieve our objective, we create a unique database that has an international sample of Islamic and conventional funds grouped by management company. By distinguishing between Islamic and conventional funds, the legal, political and economic conditions explain their fees, performance and risk

The Effects of Law, Culture and Political Risk: New Evidence from Mutual Fund Performance, Risk Taking and Fees

International audienceThis paper considers an international sample of conventional and Islamic mutual funds to assess whether law, culture and political risk affect their compensation fees and expense ratio. The data are hand-collected from many sources. Overall, the results show strongly that legal conditions, culture and political risk have robust differential effects on fees. We find that Islamic mutual funds in countries with higher legal conditions receive lower fees, whereas conventional funds receive higher carried interest, lower fixed management fees and weaker expense ratio. Overall, Hoefsted culture’s measures affect significantly the fees’ structure with robust differential effects on Islamic and conventional funds. Focusing on political risk effects, we show that, in countries with higher political risk, the compensation fees and expense ratio will be higher. The components of country legality and political risk Index have significant differential effects on Islamic and conventional funds’ characteristics

Agency Problems in Venture Capital Contracts: Islamic Profit Sharing Ratio as a Screening Device

Both Islamic and classical venture contracts suffer from information asymmetry and incentive problems. Venture capitalist and Entrepreneur have an agency relationship because of the insufficient information about the funded project and/or the entrepreneur type. Referring to the literature, this paper presents a theory of Profit Sharing Ratio (PSR) for PLS contracts with adverse selection about the entrepreneur type. In order to avoid the agency problem, this paper proposes a theoretical framework in which the negotiated profit sharing ratio (PSR) acts as a screening device. We show that agency problems are signaled when the entrepreneur accepts a PSR set beyond a given threshold. This critical value of the PSR corresponds to the maximum payoff to the venture capitalist. We suggest that the optimal PSR level may complete the carried interest in classical venture contracts and offers a new tool for screening entrepreneurs’ type.no

Agency Problems in Venture Capital Contracts: Islamic Profit Sharing Ratio as a Screening Device

Both Islamic and classical venture contracts suffer from information asymmetry and incentive problems. Venture capitalist and Entrepreneur have an agency relationship because of the insufficient information about the funded project and/or the entrepreneur type. Referring to the literature, this paper presents a theory of Profit Sharing Ratio (PSR) for PLS contracts with adverse selection about the entrepreneur type. In order to avoid the agency problem, this paper proposes a theoretical framework in which the negotiated profit sharing ratio (PSR) acts as a screening device. We show that agency problems are signaled when the entrepreneur accepts a PSR set beyond a given threshold. This critical value of the PSR corresponds to the maximum payoff to the venture capitalist. We suggest that the optimal PSR level may complete the carried interest in classical venture contracts and offers a new tool for screening entrepreneurs’ type