34 research outputs found
Distributed Maximum Matching in Bounded Degree Graphs
We present deterministic distributed algorithms for computing approximate
maximum cardinality matchings and approximate maximum weight matchings. Our
algorithm for the unweighted case computes a matching whose size is at least
(1-\eps) times the optimal in \Delta^{O(1/\eps)} +
O\left(\frac{1}{\eps^2}\right) \cdot\log^*(n) rounds where is the number
of vertices in the graph and is the maximum degree. Our algorithm for
the edge-weighted case computes a matching whose weight is at least (1-\eps)
times the optimal in
\log(\min\{1/\wmin,n/\eps\})^{O(1/\eps)}\cdot(\Delta^{O(1/\eps)}+\log^*(n))
rounds for edge-weights in [\wmin,1].
The best previous algorithms for both the unweighted case and the weighted
case are by Lotker, Patt-Shamir, and Pettie~(SPAA 2008). For the unweighted
case they give a randomized (1-\eps)-approximation algorithm that runs in
O((\log(n)) /\eps^3) rounds. For the weighted case they give a randomized
(1/2-\eps)-approximation algorithm that runs in O(\log(\eps^{-1}) \cdot
\log(n)) rounds. Hence, our results improve on the previous ones when the
parameters , \eps and \wmin are constants (where we reduce the
number of runs from to ), and more generally when
, 1/\eps and 1/\wmin are sufficiently slowly increasing functions
of . Moreover, our algorithms are deterministic rather than randomized.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1402.379
Best of Two Local Models: Local Centralized and Local Distributed Algorithms
We consider two models of computation: centralized local algorithms and local
distributed algorithms. Algorithms in one model are adapted to the other model
to obtain improved algorithms.
Distributed vertex coloring is employed to design improved centralized local
algorithms for: maximal independent set, maximal matching, and an approximation
scheme for maximum (weighted) matching over bounded degree graphs. The
improvement is threefold: the algorithms are deterministic, stateless, and the
number of probes grows polynomially in , where is the number of
vertices of the input graph.
The recursive centralized local improvement technique by Nguyen and
Onak~\cite{onak2008} is employed to obtain an improved distributed
approximation scheme for maximum (weighted) matching. The improvement is
twofold: we reduce the number of rounds from to for a
wide range of instances and, our algorithms are deterministic rather than
randomized
Faster and Simpler Distributed Algorithms for Testing and Correcting Graph Properties in the CONGEST-Model
In this paper we present distributed testing algorithms of graph properties
in the CONGEST-model [Censor-Hillel et al. 2016]. We present one-sided error
testing algorithms in the general graph model.
We first describe a general procedure for converting -testers with
a number of rounds , where denotes the diameter of the graph, to
rounds, where is the number of
processors of the network. We then apply this procedure to obtain an optimal
tester, in terms of , for testing bipartiteness, whose round complexity is
, which improves over the -round algorithm by Censor-Hillel et al. (DISC 2016). Moreover, for
cycle-freeness, we obtain a \emph{corrector} of the graph that locally corrects
the graph so that the corrected graph is acyclic. Note that, unlike a tester, a
corrector needs to mend the graph in many places in the case that the graph is
far from having the property.
In the second part of the paper we design algorithms for testing whether the
network is -free for any connected of size up to four with round
complexity of . This improves over the
-round algorithms for testing triangle freeness by
Censor-Hillel et al. (DISC 2016) and for testing excluded graphs of size by
Fraigniaud et al. (DISC 2016).
In the last part we generalize the global tester by Iwama and Yoshida (ITCS
2014) of testing -path freeness to testing the exclusion of any tree of
order . We then show how to simulate this algorithm in the CONGEST-model in
rounds