3 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacements.
Amid rapid growth in transcatheter valvular interventions computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a pivotal noninvasive imaging resource that can be used throughout many stages of the transcatheter heart valve process, enhancing procedural success and efficacy. It affords a three-dimensional assessment of the aortic and challenging saddle-shaped mitral annulus, facilitating appropriate device selection, sizing, and preprocedural prediction angles for prosthetic deployment. Postprocedural imaging allows documentation of procedural success, evaluation of prosthesis positioning, and identifying asymptomatic complications. This article provides an overview of the role of CT in both trancatheter aortic valve repair (TAVR) and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR)
Recommended from our members
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM): New insights into Coronary artery remodelling and ischemia from FFRCT.
INTRODUCTION: Angina, myocardial ischemia, and coronary artery physiology in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are poorly understood. However, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with fractional flow reserve from CT (FFRCT) analysis offers a non-invasive method for evaluation of coronary artery volume to myocardial mass ratio (V/M) that may provide insight into such mechanisms. Thus, we sought to investigate changes in V/M in HCM. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 37 HCM patients and 37 controls matched for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors; CCTA-derived coronary artery lumen volume (V) and myocardial mass (M) were used to determine V/M. FFRCT values were calculated for the left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCx) and right coronary (RCA) arteries as well as the 3-vessel cumulative FFRCT values. RESULTS: HCM patients had significantly increased myocardial mass (176 ± 84 vs. 119 ± 27 g, p < 0.0001) and total coronary artery luminal volume (4112 ± 1139 vs. 3290 ± 924 mm3, p < 0.0001) that resulted from increases in segmented luminal volumes of both the left and right coronary artery systems. However, HCM patients had significantly decreased V/M (23.8 ± 5.9 vs. 26.5 ± 5.3 mm3/g; p = 0.026) which was further decreased when restricting V/M analysis to those HCM patients with septal hypertrophy (22.4 mm3/g, p = 0.01) that was mild-moderately predictive of HCM (AUC = 0.68). HCM patients also showed significantly lower nadir FFRCT values in the LCx (0.87 ± 0.06 vs. 0.91 ± 0.06, p = 0.02), and cumulative 3-vessel FFRCT values (2.58 ± 0.18 vs. 2.63 ± 0.14, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: HCM patients demonstrate significantly greater coronary volume. Despite this, HCM patients suffer from decreased V/M. Further prospective studies evaluating the relationship between V/M, angina, and heart failure in HCM are needed