10 research outputs found
Beyond the conference: Singing our SSONG
The International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) annual conference presents an exciting opportunity to meet with international colleagues from diverse backgrounds and situations to commune on our common interest in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). As with every ISSOTL conference, the enthusiasm for SoTL was palpable in Los Angeles in 2016. Rich discussions took place, networks were formed, and promises to keep in touch were made. Unfortunately, previous conference experiences have taught us that these good intentions often fall short once the conference bubble has burst and the reality of daily life sets in once more. In an attempt to circumvent this phenomenon, we—seven colleagues from three different countries—embarked on a research project that enabled us to maintain the relationships and fruitful discussions we had initiated at ISSOTL16. We established Small, Significant Online Network Group, or SSONG, inspired by a conference workshop on small significant networks. As a group, we met regularly online using Adobe Connect© and engaged in significant conversations around SoTL that were private, trustful, and intellectually intriguing. This article reflects our experiences in establishing and maintaining the group. We discuss how the group was formed; its alignment with the concept of small, significant networks; and the benefits and challenges we encountered. Four key principles of the group that have emerged will also be discussed in detail, enabling readers to consider how they could adapt the concept for their own purposes
Learning to teach (LETS): developing curricular and cross curricular competences in becoming a 'good' secondary teacher: executive summary
The aim of this research, the Learning to Teach Study (LETS), the first of its kind on
the Postgraduate Diploma in Education (PGDE) in Ireland, funded by the Department
of Education and Skills (DES), was to develop and implement a study of initial
teacher education in the PGDE in post-primary education, in the School of
Education, University College Cork. Its aim was to identify the individual and
contextual dynamics of how student teachers develop curricular and cross-curricular
competences during initial teacher education (ITE). Within an overall framework that
explores how student teachers develop their skills, competences and identity as
teachers, it focuses on curricular competences in mathematics, science and
language teaching, and on the cross-curricular competences of reading and digital
literacy and the development of inclusive teaching practices. LETS is the first
programme level research on the PGDE, familiarly known to generations of student
teachers and teachers as ‘the Dip’ or ‘the HDip’.
Drawing on research on teacher education both in Ireland and internationally, the
LETS report is divided into six sections encompassing thirteen chapters. Section 1
includes the review of literature and study aims in Chapter 1 and the research
methodology in Chapter 2. Adopting an interpretive approach, LETS involved the
collaborative development of three interviews protocols and a survey by the research
team. Seventeen (n=17) students were interviewed three times over the course of
PGDE programme, and one hundred and thirty three students completed a detailed
survey on their learning to teach experience (n=133, i.e. response rate of 62.7% of
the 212 students in the PGDE 2008/09 cohort). The four chapters in Section 2 focus
on professional identity as a central dimension of learning to teach. Among the
dimensions of learning to teach addressed in this section are the role of observation
and cultural scripts in becoming a teacher, the visibility/invisibility of PGDE students
as learners and the relationships between emotions, resilience and commitment to
teaching. The three chapters in Section 3 focus on mathematics, modern languages
and science respectively in the context of conventional and reform-oriented visions of
good teaching. A number of common as well as subject-specific themes emerged in
this section in relation to subject matter teaching. Section 4 focuses on PGDE
students’ experience of inclusion (chapter 10) and reading literacy (chapter 11) while
learning to teach. Section 5 focuses on a key aspect of initial teacher education,
namely, the school-university partnership. The final section provides a summary of
the findings, identifies seven key issues emerging from these findings, makes
Learning to Teach Study (LETS)
recommendations under four headings (system, teacher education institutions,
partnerships in ITE and further research) and discusses some implications for
research, policy and practice in initial teacher education.
Among the main findings emerging from the study are: (i) schools provide valuable
support for PGDE students but this typically does not focus on classroom pedagogy,
(ii) PGDE students typically felt that they had to be ‘invisible’ as learners in schools to
gain and maintain authority and status, (iii) inherited cultural scripts about what it
means to be a ‘good’ subject teacher shaped teacher identity and classroom
practice, and (iv) as PGDE students begin to feel competent as teachers of maths,
modern languages and science, this feeling of competence typically does not include
their capacity to teach for inclusion and reading literacy within their subject teaching.
In the context of research on teacher education, many of the findings are not unique
to the PGDE or to UCC but reflect perennial dilemmas and emerging challenges in
initial teacher education. This fact is important in setting a context for the wider
dissemination2 of the Learning to Teach Study
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19
IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022).
INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes.
RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570
The use of the target language/second language and the use of the first language: four case studies of German and Spanish teachers in modern foreign language post-primary classrooms in the Republic of Ireland
The role and importance of teaching a modern foreign language mainly through the target language has been an issue of considerable debate. Current best practice suggests that use of the target language as the principal language of the classroom is an important element in creating an effective learning environment. The pedagogical value of use of the first language is also contested. There has been limited research into these aspects of classroom practice and in particular classroom-based research in post-primary schools. Modern foreign language teachers require research-informed guidelines to support them in their thinking and decision-making around use of the target language and the first language. The purpose of this study is to better understand use of the target language and the first language in the practice of two post-primary teachers of German and two of Spanish. Both a cognitive and a socio-cultural theoretical perspective inform the study. A multiple case study research approach has been selected as it allows for a more detailed consideration of multiple perspectives and use of a range of data sources. Data was collected from classroom observations including Junior Cycle and Senior Cycle classes over two/three days and teacher and pupil semi-structured interviews. Analysis of audio and/or video recordings of classroom interaction, teacher and pupil interview data including some use of audio- and video-stimulated recall, focused on identifying current practice in use of the target language and the first language, the interrelationship between use of the target language as the main language of the classroom and more general target language input and interaction, the importance of contextual factors and the learner perspective. Findings from the analysis were used as a basis to identify key guiding principles for teachers in their use of the target language and the first language and to articulate more general recommendations
Beyond the conference: Singing our SSONG
The International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) annual conference presents an exciting opportunity to meet with international colleagues from diverse backgrounds and situations to commune on our common interest in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). As with every ISSOTL conference, the enthusiasm for SoTL was palpable in Los Angeles in 2016. Rich discussions took place, networks were formed, and promises to keep in touch were made. Unfortunately, previous conference experiences have taught us that these good intentions often fall short once the conference bubble has burst and the reality of daily life sets in once more. In an attempt to circumvent this phenomenon, we—seven colleagues from three different countries—embarked on a research project that enabled us to maintain the relationships and fruitful discussions we had initiated at ISSOTL16. We established Small, Significant Online Network Group, or SSONG, inspired by a conference workshop on small significant networks. As a group, we met regularly online using Adobe Connect© and engaged in significant conversations around SoTL that were private, trustful, and intellectually intriguing. This article reflects our experiences in establishing and maintaining the group. We discuss how the group was formed; its alignment with the concept of small, significant networks; and the benefits and challenges we encountered. Four key principles of the group that have emerged will also be discussed in detail, enabling readers to consider how they could adapt the concept for their own purposes
Reporting to parents in primary school: communication, meaning and learning
How schools report to parents about the learning of their children is
becoming increasingly important and challenging in the light of a)
new developments and understanding about learning and assessment,
b) Ireland’s relatively recent cultural diversity, and c) recent legislation
and official policy highlighting how schools are accountable to
students, parents and the State. The NCCA’s Reporting Children’s
Progress in Primary Schools endorses the role of parents, as partners
with schools, in extending children’s learning. School reporting
practices are central to this role. The nature of these practices is the
theme of this NCCA-commissioned study. In terms of assessment
policy and practice, we note that reporting is more closely linked
with summative than formative assessment (as indicated in the shaded
column in Table 1). As such, in terms of formal reporting at both
parent-teacher meetings and in relation to written report cards the
emphasis is on ‘what has been learned by students to date’, that is,
‘assessment of learning’ (AoL)
Supporting Writing Collaborations through Synchronous Technologies: Singing Our SSONG about Working Together at a Distance
Academia in general, and academic writing in particular, are often isolated endeavours (Fergie, Beeke, McKenna, & Crème, 2011). Isolation can hamper academic success - most of us have felt the heightened effects of intense work demands when our support system is not present. This can be even more palpable when collaborative partners are globally located. With the advent of technology, collaborators now have tools to assuage academic isolation and foster rich, productive collaborations. Using synchronous technology, a common passion for SoTL work and collaborative work has led to lasting partnerships across continents that support both personal and professional development. Synchronous and asynchronous technologies offered the authors ongoing opportunities to actively participate in academic dialogue and collaborate on multiple publications, despite being scattered over three continents. This unique academic collaboration is called a Small Significant Online Network Group (SSONG). The name SSONG was modified from work describing small significant networks (Roxå & Mårtensson, 2009, 2012; Verwoord & Poole, 2016). The authors included the online component, which provided the apt overarching metaphor of a song, situating song as a collaborative work of art. Singing our SSONG has a choral ring to it, underscoring the strength in its collaborative cacophony of voices. The SSONG highlights academic writing\u27s multi-modal elements. The richness of the different author voices in a SSONG bring confidence, encouragement, and personal and professional transformation
Learning to teach (LETS): developing curricular and cross curricular competences in becoming a \u27good\u27 secondary teacher: executive summary
The aim of this research, the Learning to Teach Study (LETS), the first of its kind on
the Postgraduate Diploma in Education (PGDE) in Ireland, funded by the Department
of Education and Skills (DES), was to develop and implement a study of initial
teacher education in the PGDE in post-primary education, in the School of
Education, University College Cork. Its aim was to identify the individual and
contextual dynamics of how student teachers develop curricular and cross-curricular
competences during initial teacher education (ITE). Within an overall framework that
explores how student teachers develop their skills, competences and identity as
teachers, it focuses on curricular competences in mathematics, science and
language teaching, and on the cross-curricular competences of reading and digital
literacy and the development of inclusive teaching practices. LETS is the first
programme level research on the PGDE, familiarly known to generations of student
teachers and teachers as ‘the Dip’ or ‘the HDip’.
Drawing on research on teacher education both in Ireland and internationally, the
LETS report is divided into six sections encompassing thirteen chapters. Section 1
includes the review of literature and study aims in Chapter 1 and the research
methodology in Chapter 2. Adopting an interpretive approach, LETS involved the
collaborative development of three interviews protocols and a survey by the research
team. Seventeen (n=17) students were interviewed three times over the course of
PGDE programme, and one hundred and thirty three students completed a detailed
survey on their learning to teach experience (n=133, i.e. response rate of 62.7% of
the 212 students in the PGDE 2008/09 cohort). The four chapters in Section 2 focus
on professional identity as a central dimension of learning to teach. Among the
dimensions of learning to teach addressed in this section are the role of observation
and cultural scripts in becoming a teacher, the visibility/invisibility of PGDE students
as learners and the relationships between emotions, resilience and commitment to
teaching. The three chapters in Section 3 focus on mathematics, modern languages
and science respectively in the context of conventional and reform-oriented visions of
good teaching. A number of common as well as subject-specific themes emerged in
this section in relation to subject matter teaching. Section 4 focuses on PGDE
students’ experience of inclusion (chapter 10) and reading literacy (chapter 11) while
learning to teach. Section 5 focuses on a key aspect of initial teacher education,
namely, the school-university partnership. The final section provides a summary of
the findings, identifies seven key issues emerging from these findings, makes
Learning to Teach Study (LETS)
recommendations under four headings (system, teacher education institutions,
partnerships in ITE and further research) and discusses some implications for
research, policy and practice in initial teacher education.
Among the main findings emerging from the study are: (i) schools provide valuable
support for PGDE students but this typically does not focus on classroom pedagogy,
(ii) PGDE students typically felt that they had to be ‘invisible’ as learners in schools to
gain and maintain authority and status, (iii) inherited cultural scripts about what it
means to be a ‘good’ subject teacher shaped teacher identity and classroom
practice, and (iv) as PGDE students begin to feel competent as teachers of maths,
modern languages and science, this feeling of competence typically does not include
their capacity to teach for inclusion and reading literacy within their subject teaching.
In the context of research on teacher education, many of the findings are not unique
to the PGDE or to UCC but reflect perennial dilemmas and emerging challenges in
initial teacher education. This fact is important in setting a context for the wider
dissemination2 of the Learning to Teach Study
Developing 'good' post-primary teachers and teaching in a reform era: cultural dynamics in a programme level study of the PDE
Most discussions about the quality of schooling quickly turn to the quality of teachers,
reflections and memories of individual teachers who ‘made a difference’, whether
good or not so, in a person’s school biography. The quest for the ‘good teacher’ is
important to parents, interleaves itself into a community’s conversations about its
schools, animates children’s and adolescents’ reflections on a central feature of their
lives and increasingly is the protagonist in policy debates on teacher education