22 research outputs found
How physics instruction impacts students' beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies
In this meta-analysis, we synthesize the results of 24 studies using the
Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) and the Maryland
Physics Expectations Survey (MPEX) to answer several questions: (1) How does
physics instruction impact students' beliefs? (2) When do physics majors
develop expert-like beliefs? and (3) How do students' beliefs impact their
learning of physics? We report that in typical physics classes, students'
beliefs deteriorate or at best stay the same. There are a few types of
interventions, including an explicit focus on model-building and/or developing
expert- like beliefs that lead to significant improvements in beliefs. Further,
small courses and those for elementary education and non-science majors also
result in improved beliefs. However, because the available data oversamples
certain types of classes, it is unclear whether these improvements are actually
due to the interventions, or due to the small class size, or student population
typical of the kinds of classes in which these interventions are most often
used. Physics majors tend to enter their undergraduate education with more
expert-like beliefs than non-majors and these beliefs remain relatively stable
throughout their undergraduate careers. Thus, typical physics courses appear to
be selecting students who already have strong beliefs, rather than supporting
students in developing strong beliefs. There is a small correlation between
students' incoming beliefs about physics and their gains on conceptual
mechanics surveys. This suggests that students with more expert-like incoming
beliefs may learn more in their physics courses, but this finding should be
further explored and replicated. Some unanswered questions remain. To answer
these questions, we advocate several specific types of future studies.Comment: 30 pages. Accepted to Phys Rev ST-PE
Research-based assessment affordances and constraints: Perceptions of physics faculty
To help faculty use research-based materials in a more significant way, we
learn about their perceived needs and desires and use this information to
suggest ways for the Physics Education Research community to address these
needs. When research-based resources are well aligned with the perceived needs
of faculty, faculty members will more readily take them up. We used
phenomenographic interviews of ordinary physics faculty and department chairs
to identify four families of issues that faculty have around research-based
assessments (RBA). First, many faculty are interested in using RBAs but have
practical needs around how to do so: how to find them, which ones there are,
and how to administer them. They want help addressing these needs. Second, at
the same time, many faculty think that RBAs are limited and don't measure many
of the things they care about, or aren't applicable in their classes. They want
assessments to measure skills, perceptions, and specific concepts. Third, many
faculty want to turn to communities of other faculty and experts to help them
interpret their assessment results and suggest other ways to do assessment.
They want to norm their assessment results by comparing to others and
interacting with faculty from other schools to learn about how they do
assessment. Fourth, many faculty consider their courses in the broader contexts
of accountability and their departments. They want help with assessment in
these broader contexts. We also discuss how faculty members role in their
department and type of institution influence their perceived wants and needs
around assessment.Comment: submitted to Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education
Researc
Energy conservation in dissipative processes: Teacher expectations and strategies associated with imperceptible thermal energy
Research has demonstrated that many students and some teachers do not
consistently apply the conservation of energy principle when analyzing
mechanical scenarios. In observing elementary and secondary teachers engaged in
learning activities that require tracking and conserving energy, we find that
challenges to energy conservation often arise in dissipative scenarios in which
kinetic energy transforms into thermal energy (e.g., a ball rolls to a stop).
We find that teachers expect that when they can see the motion associated with
kinetic energy, they should be able to perceive the warmth associated with
thermal energy. Their expectations are violated when the warmth produced is
imperceptible. In these cases, teachers reject the idea that the kinetic energy
transforms to thermal energy. Our observations suggest that apparent
difficulties with energy conservation may have their roots in a strong and
productive association between forms of energy and their perceptible
indicators. We see teachers resolve these challenges by relating the original
scenario to an exaggerated version in which the dissipated thermal energy is
associated with perceptible warmth. Using these exaggerations, teachers infer
that thermal energy is present to a lesser degree in the original scenario.
They use this exaggeration strategy to productively track and conserve energy
in dissipative scenarios.Comment: 19 pages, 3 figure