Volunteer tourism: Evidence of cathartic tourist experiences

The study involved in-depth interviews with participants of an Australian non-government organization (NGO) that organizes projects in which young volunteers aged between 17 and 26 years from Australia and New Zealand participate in welfare projects with partner NGOs in developing countries. The welfare projects provide on the ground assistance to communities; these may not lead to longer-term sustainable development through longer-term skills training but engage the volunteers and community in a mutual exchange. Typically, participants will be engaged in short term courses in health and hygiene, micro-enterprise management skills, assisting in community health projects, community service with children with disabilities or orphans, painting, construction of school playgrounds and classrooms, guest teaching in schools, cultural exchange and disaster relief. The Australian NGO provides no financial assistance for participants; it primarily organizes and facilitates the travel, project and community work. Each project lasts between two and four weeks and are thus typically short-term in duration. As such, participants can be considered 'shallow volunteer tourists' (Callanan and Thomas 2005)

Situating the self in religious tourism research: An author’s reflexive perspective

This paper reflectively examines aspects of the author’s journey as an academic researcher and research supervisor to discuss and recognise the realities of situated knowledge creation within the study of religion tourism. Specifically, I focus on issues which have emerged from my experiences of researching religious tourism, and the issues and ethical challenges encountered during the supervision process when advising students in the same field. Two wider questions are posed in the consideration of the researcher’s and supervisor’s journey: Firstly, can we research the lived experiences of others when we hold different religious beliefs to those whom we study and collaborate with? Secondly, what are the key ethical issues in doing so? In discussing these questions, drawing on the experiences of the author and two of her research students, the paper aims to turn religious tourism discourse ‘towards the self’ in the hope of engendering further consideration of reflexivity within this field of enquiry

Spiritual hosting: An exploration of the interplay between spiritual identities and tourism

The facilitation of tourism experiences based on shared ideology is increasingly being seen to contribute to tourism worldwide. However, these studies have not considered informal networks that promote shared religious or spiritual ideology, such as that offered by the New Zealand HIT (Hosting Israeli Travellers) network. Whilst pilgrimage for spiritual goals has been given considerable attention by tourism researchers, these studies have exclusively focused on religion and spirituality as a motivation among travellers, rather than hosts or the effect of hosts\u27 spiritual motivations on the host-tourist encounter. Drawing on exploratory qualitative research applying the Value-Stretch Gap-Analysis Model, this paper analyses the ideological characteristics of the New Zealand HIT network and provides insights into the motivations of HIT hosts. As such, this paper seeks to contribute insights into the interplay between tourism and spiritual identities by exploring the conceptual power of faith and spirituality in potentially shaping tourism production and consumption. The notion of spiritual hosting is introduced as an appropriate conceptualisation of the performance and construction of hosted experiences facilitated by the HIT network in New Zealand

A critical consideration of LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® methodology for tourism studies

In recent decade tourism researches turned their attention to creative qualitative methodologies to gain the deeper understandings of tourism phenomena. Despite the considerable body of research focusing on creative methodologies there is a need to challenge and creatively disrupt conventional methodological approaches as they are criticised for their inability to be participant driven, capture the co-construction of research context or to address the impact of wider social dynamics to knowledge creation in tourism studies. Based on our research focused on host–guests experiences participating in the World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms (WWOOF) programme in New Zealand we provide a critical consideration of LEGO ® SERIOUS PLAY ® for tourism studies. LEGO ® SERIOUS PLAY ® is a communication tool aimed at developing creative thinking through building metaphors around identities and experiences using LEGO ® bricks. To demonstrate how the method can be used in tourism studies, we draw on examples from three LEGO ® SERIOUS PLAY ® workshops to illustrate the benefits and challenges of this methodological approach. LEGO ® SERIOUS PLAY ® offered a metaphorical way for participants to construct creative artefacts and explain their ideal WWOOFing experience, representing sometimes complex, entrenched and emotional issues, and relationships that may have been difficult to express via traditional methods. The method enables participant driven, co-production of knowledge in a playful, free-flowing way to foster creative thinking, meanings and possible solutions. The method helps participants creatively communicate complex and sensitive issues, especially around their relationships–to objects, landscapes, people and identities–aspects that may otherwise be silenced by traditional research methods. As a novel method LEGO ® SERIOUS PLAY ® provides opportunities for researchers who want to gain a deeper understanding of the social dimensions of tourism, to co-create spaces for knowledge exchange and develop an in-depth understanding of socially constructed relationships and realities

Automated Classification of Depression from Structural Brain Measures across Two Independent Community-based Cohorts

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This study was supported and funded by the Wellcome Trust Strategic Award ‘Stratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally’ (STRADL) (Reference 104036/Z/14/Z), and the Medical Research Council Mental Health Pathfinder Award ‘Leveraging routinely collected and linked research data to study the causes and consequences of common mental disorders’ (Reference MRC-MC_PC_17209). MAH is supported by research funding from the Dr Mortimer and Theresa Sackler Foundation. The research was conducted using the UK Biobank resource, with application number 4844. Structural brain imaging data from the UK Biobank was processed at the University of Edinburgh Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE) http://www.ccace.ed.ac.uk/), which is a part of the crosscouncil Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Initiative (MR/K026992/1). CCACE received funding from Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Medical Research Council (MRC), and was also supported by Age UK as part of The Disconnected Mind project. This work has made use of the resources provided by the Edinburgh Compute and Data Facility (ECDF) (http://www.ecdf.ed.ac.uk/)Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Disrupted limbic-prefrontal effective connectivity in response to fearful faces in lifetime depression

Background: Multiple brain imaging studies of negative emotional bias in major depressive disorder (MDD) have used images of fearful facial expressions and focused on the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex. The results have, however, been inconsistent, potentially due to small sample sizes (typically N < 50 ). It remains unclear if any alterations are a characteristic of current depression or of past experience of depression, and whether there are MDD-related changes in effective connectivity between the two brain regions.Methods: Activations and effective connectivity between the amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in response to fearful face stimuli were studied in a large population-based sample from Generation Scotland. Participants either had no history of MDD ( N = 664 in activation analyses, N = 474 in connectivity analyses) or had a diagnosis of MDD during their lifetime (LMDD, N = 290 in activation analyses, N = 214 in connectivity analyses). The within-scanner task involved implicit facial emotion processing of neutral and fearful faces.Results: Compared to controls, LMDD was associated with increased activations in left amygdala ( PFWE = 0.031 , k E = 4 ) and left DLPFC ( PFWE = 0.002 , k E = 33 ), increased mean bilateral amygdala activation ( β = 0.0715, P = 0.0314 ), and increased inhibition from left amygdala to left DLPFC, all in response to fearful faces contrasted to baseline. Results did not appear to be attributable to depressive illness severity or antidepressant medication status at scan time.Limitations: Most studied participants had past rather than current depression, average severity of ongoing depression symptoms was low, and a substantial proportion of participants were receiving medication. The study was not longitudinal and the participants were only assessed a single time.Conclusions: LMDD is associated with hyperactivity of the amygdala and DLPFC, and with stronger amygdala to DLPFC inhibitory connectivity, all in response to fearful faces, unrelated to depression severity at scan time. These results help reduce inconsistency in past literature and suggest disruption of ‘bottom-up’ limbic-prefrontal effective connectivity in depression

Local CpG density affects the trajectory and variance of age-associated DNA methylation changes

Acknowledgements We thank Riccardo Marioni, Chris Haley, Ailith Ewing, David Porteous, Chris Ponting, Rob Illingworth, Tamir Chandra, Sara Hagg, Yunzhang Wang, Chantriolnt-Andreas Kapourani, Nick Gilbert, Hannes Becher and members of the Sproul lab for helpful discussions about the study and the manuscript. This work has made use of the resources provided by the University of Edinburgh digital research services and the MRC IGC compute cluster. We are grateful to all the families who took part in the Generation Scotland study along with the general practitioners and the Scottish School of Primary Care for their help in recruiting them, and the entire Generation Scotland team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists, healthcare assistants, and nurses. Peer review information Anahita Bishop and Kevin Pang were the primary editors of this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team. Review history The review history is available as Additional file 3. Funding DS is a Cancer Research UK Career Development fellow (reference C47648/A20837), and work in his laboratory is also supported by an MRC university grant to the MRC Human Genetics Unit. LK is a cross-disciplinary postdoctoral fellow supported by funding from the University of Edinburgh and Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00009/2). S.R.C. and I.J.D. were supported by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grant R01AG054628, and S.R.C is supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (221890/Z/20/Z). AMM is supported by the Wellcome Trust (104036/Z/14/Z, 216767/Z/19/Z, 220857/Z/20/Z) and UKRI MRC (MC_PC_17209, MR/S035818/1). PMV acknowledges support from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (1113400) and the Australian Research Council (FL180100072). DMH is supported by a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Reference 213674/Z/18/Z). We thank the LBC1936 participants and team members who contributed to the study. Further study information can be found at https://www.ed.ac.uk/lothian-birth-cohorts. The LBC1936 is supported by a jointly funded grant from the BBSRC and ESRC (BB/W008793/1), and also by Age UK (Disconnected Mind project), the Medical Research Council (G0701120, G1001245, MR/M013111/1, MR/R024065/1), and the University of Edinburgh. Genotyping of LBC1936 was funded by the BBSRC (BB/F019394/1), and methylation typing of LBC1936 was supported by Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (Pilot Fund award), Age UK, The Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund, The University of Edinburgh, and The University of Queensland. Work on Generation Scotland was supported by a Wellcome Strategic Award “STratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally” (STRADL; 104036/Z/14/Z) to AMM, KLE, and others, and an MRC Mental Health Data Pathfinder Grant (MC_PC_17209) to AMM. Generation Scotland received core support from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates (CZD/16/6) and the Scottish Funding Council (HR03006). DNA methylation profiling and analysis of the GS:SFHS samples was supported by Wellcome Investigator Award 220857/Z/20/Z and Grant 104036/Z/14/Z (PI: AM McIntosh) and through funding from NARSAD (Ref: 27404; awardee: Dr DM Howard) and the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (Sim Fellowship; Awardee: Dr HC Whalley).Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Associations of negative affective biases and depressive symptoms in a community-based sample

Acknowledgements. We thank professor Jonathan Roiser (University College London, UK) and professor emeritus Ian Deary (University of Edinburgh, UK) for their input on task selection and statistical analysis. We also acknowledge all researchers who have contributed to the collection of data for the current study. Most importantly, we would like to thank all participants of Generation Scotland, and particularly those of the STRADL subcohort, for their participation in the research. Financial support. Stratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally is supported by the Wellcome Trust through a Strategic Award (Grant No. 104036/Z/14/Z) and through an Investigator Award (Grant No. 220857/Z/ 20/Z). The Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Department (Grant No. CZD/16/6), Scottish Funding Council (Grant No. HR03006) and Wellcome Trust (Grant No. 216767/Z/19/Z) provided core support for Generation Scotland.Peer reviewedPublisher PD