30 research outputs found

    Lakeview, Oregon: The Little Town that Collaboration Saved

    Get PDF
    The assessment team was made up of a diverse group - eight undergraduate PSU students, two graduate teaching assistants and one instructor - representing all ages, interests and fields of study. However, one thing everyone had in common was an interest in learning about collaboration and how it might be used to improve the state of Oregon, the nation and even the world. To that end, everyone participating in the Capstone course hoped to enhance their “Skills for Being an Effective Collaborator.” As this is the first time this course has been offered, we hope our success in meeting its goals ensures it is offered again in the future. Oregon Solutions in sponsoring the Capstone field trip, set forth on a goal of gaining greater comprehension around what it takes to guarantee a truly successful collaboration. Our goal in taking on the challenge put forth by Oregon Solutions was to examine the Lakeview Biomass Project collaborative effort to better understand why it was so successful when similar attempts at collaboration had failed. In effect, we were tasked with creating a narrative that broke the project down from inception to the present day. In examining Lakeview’s collaborative process, we focused on three key questions: 1) What factors contributed to Lakeview’s success 2) What kept the momentum alive after Oregon Solutions was no longer involved? and 3) How can we generalize Lakeview’s success so that it can be applied to other communities? This report attempts to answers these questions to get at what it takes to ensure a successful collaboration. In doing so, we will analyze the specifics of the Lakeview Biomass Project, including its history, individual achievements, and current challenges. We will then attempt to generalize those findings in a way that can be used to advise others who attempt in the future to use a collaborative process under similar circumstances

    Surf and turf vision: Patterns and predictors of visual acuity in compound eye evolution

    No full text
    Eyes have the flexibility to evolve to meet the ecological demands of their users. Relative to camera-type eyes, the fundamental limits of optical diffraction in arthropod compound eyes restrict the ability to resolve fine detail (visual acuity) to much lower degrees. We tested the capacity of several ecological factors to predict arthropod visual acuity, while simultaneously controlling for shared phylogenetic history. In this study, we have generated the most comprehensive review of compound eye visual acuity measurements to date, containing 385 species that span six of the major arthropod classes. An arthropod phylogeny, made custom to this database, was used to develop a phylogenetically-corrected generalized least squares (PGLS) linear model to evaluate four ecological factors predicted to underlie compound eye visual acuity: environmental light intensity, foraging strategy (predator vs. non-predator), horizontal structure of the visual scene, and environmental medium (air vs. water). To account for optical constraints on acuity related to animal size, body length was also included, but this did not show a significant effect in any of our models. Rather, the PGLS analysis revealed that the strongest predictors of compound eye acuity are described by a combination of environmental medium, foraging strategy, and environmental light intensity
    corecore