"Fogarty-like" removal of large coronary thrombus.

In order to avoid distal embolization in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction, both thrombectomy and distal protection devices have been evaluated with conflicting effects on myocardial perfusion. However, the removal of massive coronary thrombus is always problematic, and failure of standard approaches might result in severe microvascular damage. We report a case of the unusual use, in a "Fogarty-like" fashion, of the Spidertrade mark filter to trap and remove a large thrombus that was refractory to aspiration and balloon dilatation before stent implantation in a proximal, infarct-related coronary artery

Outcome of non-cardiac surgery after stent implantation in the DES era: results of the Surgery After Stent (SAS) registry

Optimal management of patients needing non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting has not been established. Objective. To assess the perioperative outcome of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery after coronary bare-metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation

Selective Intracoronary injection of sestamibi to detect myocardial viability. Prediction of perfusion and contractile recovery after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND: The main limitation of myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in detecting hibernating myocardium is the poor delivery of radiotracers in hypoperfused areas supplied by severely stenotic coronary arteries. Increasing local availability of radiotracers by intracoronary injection might represent an attractive solution. The hypothesis that the intracoronary administration of sestamibi could improve myocardial SPECT accuracy in detecting hibernating myocardium was addressed in this pilot study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven patients with prior myocardial infarction and severe stenosis of the infarct-related artery underwent myocardial SPECT after intracoronary injection of technetium 99m sestamibi immediately before percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Wall motion and perfusion were evaluated, before and 1 month after PTCA, by 2-dimensional echocardiography and rest-redistribution thallium 201 SPECT. A "low-flow area" was identified on the pre-PTCA Tl-201 SPECT image as the area with less than 50% of maximum radiotracer uptake. Changes in wall motion and perfusion in the low-flow area were compared with results of intracoronary sestamibi imaging. On a pixel-by-pixel analysis, intracoronary sestamibi predicted perfusion recovery within the low-flow area with a 91% sensitivity, a 78% specificity, and an 82% overall accuracy. Only in the 5 patients with an extent of sestamibi uptake greater than one third of the low-flow area was an improved regional and global left ventricular wall motion observed after PTCA (wall motion score index decreased from 1.95 +/- 0.28 to 1.60 +/- 0.34, P =.007; left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 42% +/- 7% to 49% +/- 7%, P =.001; asynergic segments in the low-flow area decreased from 3.6 +/- 0.9 to 1.8 +/- 1.5, P =.021). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prior myocardial infarction and severe stenosis of the infarct-related artery, sestamibi uptake after intracoronary administration identified viable myocardium that was undetected after rest-redistribution thallium SPECT but capable of clinically significant contractile improvement after revascularization

Feasibility of sequential thrombus aspiration and filter distal protection in the management of very high thrombus burden lesions

BACKGROUND: A series of thrombectomy and distal filter devices have been developed to limit distal embolization during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of the combined use of thrombus-aspirating catheters and distal filter devices in patients at high risk of no-reflow. METHODS: Thrombus aspiration (TA) and distal filter protection (DFP) were sequentially used in a series of patients undergoing urgent PCI within 48 hours of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Inclusion criteria were: (1) occlusion of the infarct-related artery; (2) at least 2 out of the 6 Yip's classification features of high thrombus burden. Coronary angiograms were evaluated off-line to assess thrombus score, coronary flow and distal embolization in different phases of the procedure. RESULTS: TA followed by DFP prior to balloon dilatation or stent implantation was successfully performed in 20 patients with acute MI due to occlusion of de novo lesions (80%) or in-stent thrombosis (20%) located in a native coronary artery (90%) or a saphenous vein graft (10%). TA was associated with a significant acute reduction of TS and improvement of coronary flow (TIMI grade from 0.7 +/- 0.8 to 1.6 +/- 1.1; p = 0.004 and CTFC from 83 +/- 29 to 52 +/- 36; p = 0.006). This facilitated the deployment of DFP, which did not induce significant flow modification (TIMI grade: 2.3 +/- 0.9 pre-DFP placement vs. 2.2 +/- 1.0 post-DFP placement; p = 0.20; CTFC: 32 +/- 28 pre-DFP placement vs. 35 +/- 28 post-DFP placement; p = 0.47). Post-PCI angiography revealed a 90% TIMI 3 flow rate and 47% MBG 3 rate with only 1 case of angiographically evident distal embolization. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential use of TA and DFP may be successfully used during PCI in patients at very high risk of distal embolization. However, the possible benefits of such an approach should be weighted with the increased complexity of the procedure. Further evaluations of the clinical efficacy of this approach are needed

Comparison of outcomes (early and six-month) of direct stenting with conventional stenting (a meta-analysis of ten randomized trials).

Although direct stenting (DS) is increasingly used in clinical practice instead of stent implantation after predilatation (conventional stenting [CS]), its impact has not been scientifically proved. We therefore performed, using Mantel-Haenszel analysis, a meta-analysis of the published randomized studies comparing DS with CS. Furthermore, all the key procedural data were systematically sought out and pooled. Ten trials (2,650 coronary lesions, 2,576 patients) were identified and entered into the analysis. Adopted angiographic exclusion criteria were homogeneous. DS, compared with CS, was found to have a similar success rate (98.7% vs 98.9%) and no specific complications. Across the studies, the mean rate of crossover to predilatation in the DS arm was 5.9%. Overall, DS was associated with a 17% procedural time (95% confidence interval [CI] 14% to 20%), a 18% fluoroscopic time (95% CI 15% to 21%), a 11% contrast volume (95% CI 9% to 14%), and a 22% cost reduction (95% CI 16% to 28%). In the early postintervention period, DS was associated with a trend toward reduction of each of the major adverse events (MACEs) and with a significant reduction of myocardial infarction (MI) + death (odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95). However, at 6 months, the OR (95% CI) for death, MI, target lesion revascularization, and MACEs were 0.47 (0.19 to 1.27), 0.72 (0.45 to 1.25), 1.07 (0.77 to 1.46), and 0.82 (0.63 to 1.08), respectively. In the subgroup of studies providing quantitative angiographic data, all the parameters were found to be similar between the CS and DS groups. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis shows that DS compared with CS, in selected coronary lesions, is safe, optimizes equipment use, and may enhance the early results of coronary interventions while warranting similar late clinical outcomes

Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study

most of the studies assessing transradial approach for coronary angiography (CA) have been performed through right radial approach (RRA). Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of left radial approach (LRA) compared with RRA for coronary procedures

Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study

most of the studies assessing transradial approach for coronary angiography (CA) have been performed through right radial approach (RRA). Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of left radial approach (LRA) compared with RRA for coronary procedures

Outcome of non-cardiac surgery after stent implantation in the DES era: results of the Surgery After Stent (SAS) registry

Optimal management of patients needing non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting has not been established. Objective. To assess the perioperative outcome of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery after coronary bare-metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (up to 2008) after coronary stenting in a single-center registry, prospectively registering clinical and procedural data about revascularization and retrospectively recording surgical details, perioperative therapy and in-hospital outcome after surgery. At our institution, we implant BMS for planned surgery at time of revascularization, and use antiplatelet therapy for surgery required within 1 month of BMS or within 12 months of DES implantation. The primary endpoint was defined as perioperative occurrence of major adverse events, both cardiovascular (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and repeated revascularization) and hemorrhagic (bleeding requiring transfusions or surgical hemostasis). RESULTS: We enrolled 101 patients: 70 treated with BMS (group 1) and 31 with DES (group 2). The mean interval between stenting and surgery was 288 days. The average number of antiplatelet drugs used during the operative period was higher in group 2 than group 1 (p = 0.02). Fifteen patients (15%) experienced major adverse events (5.9% had non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, 12% received blood transfusions), without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.72). At multivariate analysis, the predictor of primary endpoint was time interval between stenting and surgery (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: We found similar outcomes for non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting when BMS were selected for planned surgery and dual antiplatelet therapy was used, if indicated, during the operative period