Thromboelastometric analysis of the risk factors for return of spontaneous circulation in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - Fig 3

<p><b>Relationship between ROSC ratio and independent predictors by multivariate analysis (A). The “novel” ROTEM-based predictors for ROSC in the emergency department and its accuracy (B).</b> ROTEM, rotational thromboelastometry; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; ED, emergency department.</p

Standard blood tests and ROTEM findings between the ROSC and non-ROSC groups.

<p>Standard blood tests and ROTEM findings between the ROSC and non-ROSC groups.</p

Study design.

<p>Seventy-five adult OHCA patients were analyze in this study. OHCA: out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; ROTEM: rotational thromboelastometry; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation.</p

Patient characteristics and records of prehospital care between the ROSC and non-ROSC groups.

<p>Patient characteristics and records of prehospital care between the ROSC and non-ROSC groups.</p

Logistic regression analysis for ROSC in the ED.

<p>Logistic regression analysis for ROSC in the ED.</p

Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of lactate (A and C) and EXTEM A30 (B and C) for Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) in the emergency department.

<p>The cut-off value of lactate was 12.0 mmol/L, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.674, sensitivity was 56.5%, and specificity was 80.0%. The cut-off value of A30 of EXTEM was 48.0 mm, the AUC was 0.715, sensitivity was 72.7%, and specificity was 65.0%.</p