34 research outputs found

    The Effectiveness of Teleglaucoma versus In-Patient Examination for Glaucoma Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible visual impairment in the world affecting 60.5 million people worldwide in 2010, which is expected to increase to approximately 79.6 million by 2020. Therefore, glaucoma screening is important to detect, diagnose, and treat patients at the earlier stages to prevent disease progression and vision loss. Teleglaucoma uses stereoscopic digital imaging to take ocular images, which are transmitted electronically to an ocular specialist. The purpose is to synthesize literature to evaluate teleglaucoma, its diagnostic accuracy, healthcare system benefits, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to help locate published and unpublished studies. Studies which evaluate teleglaucoma as a screening device for glaucoma were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to provide estimates of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, and the relative percentage of glaucoma cases detected. The improvements to healthcare service quality and cost data were assessed. RESULTS: Of 11237 studies reviewed, 45 were included. Our results indicated that, teleglaucoma is more specific and less sensitive than in-person examination. The pooled estimates of sensitivity was 0.832 [95% CI 0.770, 0.881] and specificity was 0.790 [95% CI 0.668, 0.876]. The relative odds of a positive screen test in glaucoma cases are 18.7 times more likely than a negative screen test in a non-glaucoma cases. Additionally, the mean cost for every case of glaucoma detected was 1098.67USandofteleglaucomaperpatientscreenedwas1098.67 US and of teleglaucoma per patient screened was 922.77 US. CONCLUSION: Teleglaucoma can accurately discriminate between screen test results with greater odds for positive cases. It detects more cases of glaucoma than in-person examination. Both patients and the healthcare systems benefit from early detection, reduction in wait and travel times, increased specialist referral rates, and cost savings. Teleglaucoma is an effective screening tool for glaucoma specifically for remote and under-services communities

    Behavior change interventions and policies influencing primary healthcare professionals’ practice—an overview of reviews

    Full text link

    Together and apart: inhibition of DNA synthesis by connexin-43 and its relationship to transforming growth factor-beta

    Get PDF
    The membrane and channel protein Connexin-43 (Cx43), as well as the cytokine transforming growth factor (TGF) beta, suppress proliferative growth in cardiomyocytes and other cell types. Previously we showed that the inhibitory effect of Cx43 is cancelled when Cx43 becomes phosphorylated at serine (S) 262 in response to mitogen stimulation. We have now asked if the TGFbeta-triggered inhibition of DNA synthesis is associated with changes in Cx43 phosphorylation at S262. Conversely, we investigated if inhibition of DNA synthesis by overexpressed Cx43 is dependent on engaging TGFbeta signal transduction. We report that TGFbeta acutely prevented mitogen-induced Cx43 phosphorylation at S262, while chronic inhibition of TGFbeta signal transduction raised baseline levels of endogenous phospho-S262-Cx43 without affecting total Cx43. Inhibition of baseline TGFbeta signal transduction through, (a) inhibiting TGFbeta receptor I with SB431542, (b), inhibiting TGFbeta receptor II by overexpressing dominant-negative TGFbetaRII, (c), inhibiting the downstream signaling mediator Smad2 by overexpressing dominant-negative Smad2, each separately increased baseline cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis, but could not reverse DNA synthesis inhibition by overexpressed Cx43. It is suggested that inhibition of cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis by TGFbeta/TGFbetaRI/II/ phospho-Smad2 signaling is mediated, at least in part, by reducing endogenous phospho-S262-Cx43 levels

    The Therapeutic Effect of Extracellular Vesicles on Asthma in Pre-Clinical Models: A Systematic Review Protocol

    No full text
    Asthma is the most common pediatric disease, characterized by chronic airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. There are several management options for asthma, but no specific treatment. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are powerful cellular mediators of endocrine, autocrine and paracrine signalling, and can modulate biophysiological function in vitro and in vivo. A thorough investigation of therapeutic effects of EVs in asthma has not been conducted. Therefore, this systematic review is designed to synthesize recent literature on the therapeutic effects of EVs on physiological and biological outcomes of asthma in pre-clinical studies. An electronic search of Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus will be conducted on manuscripts published in the last five years that adhere to standardized guidelines for EV research. Grey literature will also be included. Two reviewers will independently screen the selected studies for title and abstract, and full text based on the eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted, narratively synthesized and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This systematic review will summarize the current knowledge from preclinical studies investigating the therapeutic effects of EVs on asthma. The results will delineate whether EVs can mitigate biological hallmarks of asthma, and if so, describe the underlying mechanisms involved in the process. This insight is crucial for identifying key pathways that can be targeted to alleviate the burden of asthma. The data will also reveal the origin, dosage and biophysical characteristics of beneficial EVs. Overall, our results will provide a scaffold for future intervention and translational studies on asthma treatment

    Behavior change interventions and policies influencing primary healthcare professionals\u2019 practice\u2014an overview of reviews

    No full text
    Abstract Background There is a plethora of interventions and policies aimed at changing practice habits of primary healthcare professionals, but it is unclear which are the most appropriate, sustainable, and effective. We aimed to evaluate the evidence on behavior change interventions and policies directed at healthcare professionals working in primary healthcare centers. Methods Study design: overview of reviews. Data source: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), The Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EbscoHost), and grey literature (January 2005 to July 2015). Study selection: two reviewers independently, and in duplicate, identified systematic reviews, overviews of reviews, scoping reviews, rapid reviews, and relevant health technology reports published in full-text in the English language. Data extraction and synthesis: two reviewers extracted data pertaining to the types of reviews, study designs, number of studies, demographics of the professionals enrolled, interventions, outcomes, and authors\u2019 conclusions for the included studies. We evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies using the AMSTAR scale. For the comparative evaluation, we classified interventions according to the behavior change wheel (Michie et al.). Results Of 2771 citations retrieved, we included 138 reviews representing 3502 individual studies. The majority of systematic reviews (91%) investigated behavior and practice changes among family physicians. Interactive and multifaceted continuous medical education programs, training with audit and feedback, and clinical decision support systems were found to be beneficial in improving knowledge, optimizing screening rate and prescriptions, enhancing patient outcomes, and reducing adverse events. Collaborative team-based policies involving primarily family physicians, nurses, and pharmacists were found to be most effective. Available evidence on environmental restructuring and modeling was found to be effective in improving collaboration and adherence to treatment guidelines. Limited evidence on nurse-led care approaches were found to be as effective as general practitioners in patient satisfaction in settings like asthma, cardiovascular, and diabetes clinics, although this needs further evaluation. Evidence does not support the use of financial incentives to family physicians, especially for long-term behavior change. Conclusions Behavior change interventions including education, training, and enablement in the context of collaborative team-based ..

    Baseline characteristics of included studies – demographics.

    No full text
    <p>Legend: CS  =  Cross-Sectional Study, PC  =  Prospective Cohort Study, CEA  =  Cost-effectiveness Analysis, RCS  =  Retrospective Cohort Study, EE  =  Economic Evaluation, –  =  Not Stated.</p><p>Baseline characteristics of included studies – demographics.</p

    Study ophthalmic examinations.

    No full text
    <p><b>Legend:</b> VCDR  =  vertical cup-to-disc ratio, HCDR  =  horizontal cup-to-disc ratio, IOP  =  intraocular pressure, FDT  =  frequency doubling technology, CCT  =  central corneal thickness, HRT  =  Heidelberg Retinal Tomography, CDR  = cup-to-disc ratio, HVF  =  Humphrey Visual Field, ACT  =  anterior chamber depth, POAG  =  primary open angle glaucoma, OAG  =  open angle glaucoma.</p><p>Study ophthalmic examinations.</p
    corecore