Stem-Loop Structures within mRNA Coding Sequences Activate Translation Initiation and Mediate Control by Small Regulatory RNAs

International audienceGraphical Abstract Highlights d A stem-loop within E. coli fepA mRNA coding region activates translation initiation d A similar activating stem-loop structure exists within bamA mRNA coding region d These stem-loops activate translation independently of their nucleotide sequence d Small RNAs repress fepA expression by targeting its activating structur

Target prediction for small, noncoding RNAs in bacteria

Many small, noncoding RNAs in bacteria act as post-transcriptional regulators by basepairing with target mRNAs. While the number of characterized small RNAs (sRNAs) has steadily increased, only a limited number of the corresponding mRNA targets have been identified. Here we present a program, TargetRNA, that predicts the targets of these bacterial RNA regulators. The program was evaluated by assessing whether previously known targets could be identified. The program was then used to predict targets for the Escherichia coli RNAs RyhB, OmrA, OmrB and OxyS, and the predictions were compared with changes in whole genome expression patterns observed upon expression of the sRNAs. Our results show that TargetRNA is a useful tool for finding mRNA targets of sRNAs, although its rate of success varies between sRNAs

Bacterial Small RNAs in Mixed Regulatory Networks

International audienc

On the role of mRNA secondary structure in bacterial translation

International audienc

Synthesis of the NarP response regulator of nitrate respiration in Escherichia coli is regulated at multiple levels by Hfq and small RNAs

ABSTRACT Two-component systems (TCS) and small RNAs (sRNA) are widespread regulators that participate in the response and the adaptation of bacteria to their environments. They mostly act at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels, respectively, and can be found integrated in regulatory circuits, where TCSs control sRNAs transcription and/or sRNAs post-transcriptionally regulate TCSs synthesis. In response to nitrate and nitrite, the paralogous NarQ-NarP and NarX-NarL TCSs regulate the expression of genes involved in anaerobic respiration of these alternative electron acceptors. In addition to the previously reported repression of NarP synthesis by the SdsN 137 sRNA, we show here that RprA, another Hfq-dependent sRNA, also negatively controls narP . Interestingly, the repression of narP by RprA actually relies on two independent controls. The first is via the direct pairing of the central region of RprA to the narP translation initiation region and presumably occurs at the translation initiation level. In contrast, the second control requires only the very 5’ end of the narP mRNA, which is targeted, most likely indirectly, by the full-length or the shorter, processed, form of RprA. In addition, our results raise the possibility of a direct role of Hfq in narP control, further illustrating the diversity of post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms in the synthesis of TCSs

Synthesis of the NarP response regulator of nitrate respiration in Escherichia coli is regulated at multiple levels by Hfq and small RNAs

International audienceAbstract Two-component systems (TCS) and small RNAs (sRNA) are widespread regulators that participate in the response and the adaptation of bacteria to their environments. TCSs and sRNAs mostly act at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels, respectively, and can be found integrated in regulatory circuits, where TCSs control sRNAs transcription and/or sRNAs post-transcriptionally regulate TCSs synthesis. In response to nitrate and nitrite, the paralogous NarQ-NarP and NarX-NarL TCSs regulate the expression of genes involved in anaerobic respiration of these alternative electron acceptors to oxygen. In addition to the previously reported repression of NarP synthesis by the SdsN137 sRNA, we show here that RprA, another Hfq-dependent sRNA, also negatively controls narP. Interestingly, the repression of narP by RprA actually relies on two independent mechanisms of control. The first is via the direct pairing of the central region of RprA to the narP translation initiation region and presumably occurs at the translation initiation level. In contrast, the second requires only the very 5′ end of the narP mRNA, which is targeted, most likely indirectly, by the full-length or the shorter, processed, form of RprA. In addition, our results raise the possibility of a direct role of Hfq in narP control, further illustrating the diversity of post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms in the synthesis of TCSs