3 research outputs found
O<sub>2</sub> Activation by Metal Surfaces: Implications for Bonding and Reactivity on Heterogeneous Catalysts
The activation of
O<sub>2</sub> on metal surfaces is a critical
process for heterogeneous catalysis and materials oxidation. Fundamental
studies of well-defined metal surfaces using a variety of techniques
have given crucial insight into the mechanisms, energetics, and dynamics
of O<sub>2</sub> adsorption and dissociation. Here, trends in the
activation of O<sub>2</sub> on transition metal surfaces are discussed,
and various O<sub>2</sub> adsorption states are described in terms
of both electronic structure and geometry. The mechanism and dynamics
of O<sub>2</sub> dissociation are also reviewed, including the importance
of the spin transition. The reactivity of O<sub>2</sub> and O toward
reactant molecules is also briefly discussed in the context of catalysis.
The reactivity of a surface toward O<sub>2</sub> generally correlates
with the adsorption strength of O, the tendency to oxidize, and the
heat of formation of the oxide. Periodic trends can be rationalized
in terms of attractive and repulsive interactions with the d-band,
such that inert metals tend to feature a full d band that is low energy
and has a large spatial overlap with adsorbate states. More open surfaces
or undercoordinated defect sites can be much more reactive than close-packed
surfaces. Reactions between O and other species tend to be more prevalent
than reactions between O<sub>2</sub> and other species, particularly
on more reactive surfaces
Hydrophilic Interaction Between Low-Coordinated Au and Water: H<sub>2</sub>O/Au(310) Studied with TPD and XPS
In
this work, we study the relatively weak H<sub>2</sub>O–Au interaction
on the highly stepped and anisotropic (310) surface with temperature-programmed
desorption and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Compared to Au(111),
we report an enhanced adsorption energy of H<sub>2</sub>O–AuÂ(310)
as observed from the (sub)Âmonolayer desorption peak. This peak shows
zero-order desorption kinetics, which we do not explain with a typical
two-phase coexistence model but rather by desorption from the ends
of one-dimensional structures. These could cover both the steps and
(part of) the terraces. We do not observe crystallization of ice clusters
as observed on Au(111). This leads to the conclusion that this stepped
surface forms a hydrophilic template for H<sub>2</sub>O adsorption.
We also notice that the precise orientation of the steps determines
the H<sub>2</sub>O binding strength. Despite the surface’s
enhanced H<sub>2</sub>O interaction, we do not observe any significant
H<sub>2</sub>O dissociation. This indicates that the presence of low-coordinated
Au atoms is not enough to explain the role of H<sub>2</sub>O in Au
catalysis
Oxygen-Promoted Methane Activation on Copper
The
role of oxygen in the activation of C–H bonds in methane
on clean and oxygen-precovered Cu(111) and Cu<sub>2</sub>OÂ(111) surfaces
was studied with combined in situ near-ambient-pressure scanning tunneling
microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Activation of methane
at 300 K and “moderate pressures” was only observed
on oxygen-precovered Cu(111) surfaces. Density functional theory calculations
reveal that the lowest activation energy barrier of C–H on
Cu(111) in the presence of chemisorbed oxygen is related to a two-active-site,
four-centered mechanism, which stabilizes the required transition-state
intermediate by dipole–dipole attraction of O–H and
Cu–CH<sub>3</sub> species. The C–H bond activation barriers
on Cu<sub>2</sub>OÂ(111) surfaces are large due to the weak stabilization
of H and CH<sub>3</sub> fragments