Change in Sleep Quality of Residents the Night Before High-Fidelity Simulation: Results From a Prospective 1-Year National Survey.

peer reviewed[en] OBJECTIVE: The stress level of participants in high-fidelity simulation stems from various factors but may result in anticipatory anxiety causing sleep disturbances during the night prior to simulation. The objective of this survey was to determine the change in sleep quality of residents during the night prior to the simulation. METHODS: The survey was proposed for 1 year to all residents at the beginning of the simulation, in 10 simulation centres. The questionnaire combined demographics and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire using visual analogue scales divided into 4 sleep qualitative domains. The primary outcome was the prevalence of sleep disturbance (>10 mm on 1 domain). Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of severe sleep disturbance (>25 mm), as well as qualitatively and quantitatively reported explanatory sleep parameters. RESULTS: Among respondents, 66% [95% CI: 63 to 69] of residents had more than 10 mm and 27% [95% CI: 24 to 30] had more than 25 mm of sleep disturbance. Residents with a sleep disturbance of more than 10 mm had fewer hours of sleep (6.4 [standard deviation=1.8] vs 7.3 [standard deviation=1.3], difference: -0.9 [95% CI: -1.1 to -0.7]; P < .0001), with a higher number of night-time awakenings (1.3 [standard deviation=1.5] vs 0.7 [standard deviation=0.9], difference: 0.6 [95% CI: 0.4 to 0.8]; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Among residents participating in the simulation, a high prevalence of change in sleep quality during the night before the simulation was noted. Strategies to help residents achieve better sleep prior to simulation should be explored

Effets d'une émulsion lipidique sur la toxicité cardiaque du flecaïnide (chez le porcelet anesthésié mécaniquement ventilé)

Objectifs de l'étude: L'efficacité des émulsions lipidiques dans l'intoxication à la bupivacaïne en fait un antidote potentiel des cardiotoxiques lipophiles. Cette étude testait l'effet électrophysiologique et hémodynamique d'une solution lipidique après injection de flécaïnide, chez le porc anesthésié mécaniquement ventilé. Matériel et méthodes : Douze porcelets recevaient 5 mg/kg de flécaïnide en 30 secondes, puis un bolus 1,5ml/kg de sérum salé isotonique ou d'Intralipide®20%, et une perfusion continue de 0,2ml/kg/mn. L'électrophysiologie cardiaque et l'hémodynamique étaient monitorés 30 minutes. En complément, la captation du flécaïnide et de la bupivacaïne (25 et 125 mg/l) par l'émulsion était évaluée en solution tampon ou sur plasma humain. Résultats: Les deux groupes présentent une forte altération des paramètres de conduction et de l'hémodynamique: augmentation du R-R, du HV, du QRS, du PR et du AH, chute de la pression artérielle moyenne (PAM) et du maximum de la dérivée première de la pression ventriculaire gauche (dP/dTmax). Pas d'effet en électrophysiologie, notamment sur l'altération maximale du R-R, du HV, du AH et du QRS. Pas de différence significative sur la PAM, le dP/dT max et la pression télédiastolique du ventricule gauche (PTDVG). In vitro, la concentration résiduelle de flécaïnide est très supérieure à celle de bupivacaïne (p<O,OOOI) sans différence significati ve entre les groupes plasma et tampon. Conclusion: Dans notre modèle, l'Intralipide® ne diminue pas les effets électrophysiologiques et hémodynamiques d'un bolus de 5mg/kg de flécaïnide. Ce résultat concorde avec une captation in vitro inférieure à celle attendue.MONTPELLIER-BU Médecine UPM (341722108) / SudocMONTPELLIER-BU Médecine (341722104) / SudocSudocFranceF

Effect of combined individual-collective debriefing of participants in interprofessional simulation courses on crisis resource management: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.

International audienceInterprofessional simulation (IPS) training is an effective way to learn crisis resource management. The type of debriefing used in IPS training may affect participants' performance and their level of psychological safety. We aimed to assess and compare performance after standard collective debriefing versus a combination of individual and collective debriefing ("combined" approach)

Simulação de manejo de via aérea difícil para residentes: estudo comparativo prospectivo

International audienceBackground and objectives: Procedural simulation training for difficult airway management offers acquisition opportunities. The hypothesis was that 3 hours of procedural simulation training for difficult airway management improves: acquisition, behavior, and patient outcomes as reported 6 months later.Methods: This prospective comparative study took place in two medical universities. Second-year residents of anesthesiology and intensive care from one region participated in 3h procedural simulation (intervention group). No intervention was scheduled for their peers from the other region (control). Prior to simulation and 6 months later, residents filled-out the same self-assessment form collecting experience with different devices. The control group filled-out the same forms simultaneously. The primary endpoint was the frequency of use of each difficult airway management device within groups at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included modifications of knowledge, skills, and patient outcomes with each device at 6 months. Intervention cost assessment was provided.Results: 44 residents were included in the intervention group and 16 in the control group. No significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint. In the intervention group, improvement of knowledge and skills was observed at 6 months for each device, and improvement of patient outcomes was observed with the use of malleable intubation stylet and Eschmann introducer. No such improvement was observed in the control group. Estimated intervention cost was 406€ per resident.Conclusions: A 3h procedural simulation training for difficult airway management did not improve the frequency of use of devices at 6 months by residents. However, other positive effects suggest exploring the best ratio of time/acquisition efficiency with difficult airway management simulation. CLINICALTRIALS.Justificativa e objetivos: O treinamento em simulação para o manejo de via aérea difícil ofe-rece oportunidades de aprendizagem. A hipótese foi que um treinamento em simulação de procedimentos de três horas, para o manejo de via aérea difícil, melhoraria o aprendizado, o comportamento e os resultados dos pacientes, conforme relatado seis meses após o treina-mento.Métodos: Este estudo comparativo prospectivo foi realizado em duas universidades médicas. Residentes do segundo ano de anestesiologia e terapia intensiva de uma região participaram de um curso de três horas em simulação de procedimentos (grupo intervenção). Nenhuma intervenção foi programada para seus pares da outra região (grupo controle). Antes da simulação e seis meses após, os residentes preencheram a mesma ficha de autoavaliação sobre sua experiência com diferentes dispositivos. O grupo controle preencheu os mesmos formulários simultaneamente. O desfecho primário foi a frequência de uso de cada dispositivo para o manejo de via aérea difícil dentro dos grupos aos seis meses. Os pontos de corte secundários incluíram modificações em relação ao conhecimento, às habilidades e aos resultados dos pacientes com cada dispositivo aos seis meses. A avaliação do custo da intervenção foi registrada.Resultados: Foram incluídos no grupo intervenção 44 residentes e 16 no grupo controle. Nenhuma diferença significativa foi observada para o ponto de corte primário. No grupo intervenção, a melhoria do conhecimento e das habilidades foi observada aos seis meses para cada dispositivo e a melhoria dos desfechos dos pacientes foi analisada com o uso de estilete maleável e do introdutor de Eschmann para intubação. Nenhuma melhoria foi observada no grupo controle. O custo da intervenção estimado foi de 406€ por residente.Conclusões: Um treinamento simulado de três horas para o manejo de via aérea difícil não melhorou a frequência do uso de dispositivos pelos residentes aos seis meses. No entanto, outros efeitos positivos sugerem a exploração da melhor relação tempo/eficiência de aquisição de conhecimento com a simulação do manejo de via aérea difícil

Simulation-based summative assessment in healthcare: an overview of key principles for practice.

peer reviewed[en] BACKGROUND: Healthcare curricula need summative assessments relevant to and representative of clinical situations to best select and train learners. Simulation provides multiple benefits with a growing literature base proving its utility for training in a formative context. Advancing to the next step, "the use of simulation for summative assessment" requires rigorous and evidence-based development because any summative assessment is high stakes for participants, trainers, and programs. The first step of this process is to identify the baseline from which we can start. METHODS: First, using a modified nominal group technique, a task force of 34 panelists defined topics to clarify the why, how, what, when, and who for using simulation-based summative assessment (SBSA). Second, each topic was explored by a group of panelists based on state-of-the-art literature reviews technique with a snowball method to identify further references. Our goal was to identify current knowledge and potential recommendations for future directions. Results were cross-checked among groups and reviewed by an independent expert committee. RESULTS: Seven topics were selected by the task force: "What can be assessed in simulation?", "Assessment tools for SBSA", "Consequences of undergoing the SBSA process", "Scenarios for SBSA", "Debriefing, video, and research for SBSA", "Trainers for SBSA", and "Implementation of SBSA in healthcare". Together, these seven explorations provide an overview of what is known and can be done with relative certainty, and what is unknown and probably needs further investigation. Based on this work, we highlighted the trustworthiness of different summative assessment-related conclusions, the remaining important problems and questions, and their consequences for participants and institutions of how SBSA is conducted. CONCLUSION: Our results identified among the seven topics one area with robust evidence in the literature ("What can be assessed in simulation?"), three areas with evidence that require guidance by expert opinion ("Assessment tools for SBSA", "Scenarios for SBSA", "Implementation of SBSA in healthcare"), and three areas with weak or emerging evidence ("Consequences of undergoing the SBSA process", "Debriefing for SBSA", "Trainers for SBSA"). Using SBSA holds much promise, with increasing demand for this application. Due to the important stakes involved, it must be rigorously conducted and supervised. Guidelines for good practice should be formalized to help with conduct and implementation. We believe this baseline can direct future investigation and the development of guidelines