26 research outputs found
Charge Localization and Ordering in AMnO Hollandite Group Oxides: Impact of Density Functional Theory Approaches
The phases of AMnO hollandite group oxides emerge from the
competition between ionic interactions, Jahn-Teller effects, charge ordering,
and magnetic interactions. Their balanced treatment with feasible computational
approaches can be challenging for commonly used approximations in Density
Functional Theory. Three examples (A = Ag, Li and K) are studied with a
sequence of different approximate exchange-correlation functionals. Starting
from a generalized gradient approximation (GGA), an extension to include van
der Waals interactions and a recently proposed meta-GGA are considered. Then
local Coulomb interactions for the Mn electrons are more explicitly
considered with the DFT+ approach. Finally selected results from a hybrid
functional approach provide a reference. Results for the binding energy of the
A species in the parent oxide highlight the role of van der Waals interactions.
Relatively accurate results for insertion energies can be achieved with a low
and a high approach. In the low case, the materials are described
as band metals with a high symmetry, tetragonal crystal structure. In the high
case, the electrons donated by A result in formation of local Mn
centers and corresponding Jahn-Teller distortions characterized by a local
order parameter. The resulting degree of monoclinic distortion depends on
charge ordering and magnetic interactions in the phase formed. The reference
hybrid functional results show charge localization and ordering. Comparison to
low temperature experiments of related compounds suggests that charge
localization is the physically correct result for the hollandite group oxides
studied here. . . .Comment: 16 pages, 8 figure
Comparisons of pH, total alkalinity, and O<sub>2</sub> concentration in nested ANOVAs for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites and in both waterbody types, i.e., bay and baymouth.
<p>Comparisons of pH, total alkalinity, and O<sub>2</sub> concentration in nested ANOVAs for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites and in both waterbody types, i.e., bay and baymouth.</p
Gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses in baymouth water, bay water, and CO<sub>2</sub>-purged bay water.
<p><i>n</i> = 6; error bars indicate SE.</p
A summary of pH and DIC components of baymouth water and bay water from both sampling sites, i.e., Skallhavet and Fiskebäckskil.
<p>A summary of pH and DIC components of baymouth water and bay water from both sampling sites, i.e., Skallhavet and Fiskebäckskil.</p
Gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses under natural O<sub>2</sub> concentrations versus O<sub>2</sub>-depleted conditions.
<p><i>n</i> = 6; error bars indicate SE.</p
Comparisons of gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses measured in bay water with two different O<sub>2</sub> levels, i.e., natural and low O<sub>2</sub> concentration for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites in repeated-measures ANOVA.
<p>Comparisons of gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses measured in bay water with two different O<sub>2</sub> levels, i.e., natural and low O<sub>2</sub> concentration for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites in repeated-measures ANOVA.</p
Gross photosynthetic rates as a function of pH under natural versus O<sub>2</sub>-depleted conditions.
<p>A) <i>Zostera marina</i>, B) <i>Ruppia maritima</i>, and C) <i>Ulva intestinalis</i>. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0083804#pone-0083804-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a> for Total DIC and O<sub>2</sub> contents of seawater at each pH value.</p
Total seawater DIC and O<sub>2</sub> contents at the pH values used in the experiments.
<p>Total seawater DIC and O<sub>2</sub> contents at the pH values used in the experiments.</p
Comparisons of gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses measured in different types of waterbody, i.e., bay water, baymouth water and CO<sub>2</sub>-purged bay water for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites in repeated-measures ANOVA.
<p>Comparisons of gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses measured in different types of waterbody, i.e., bay water, baymouth water and CO<sub>2</sub>-purged bay water for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites in repeated-measures ANOVA.</p
Percentage reduction of gross photosynthetic rates under photorespiratory conditions as a function of pH.
<p>A) <i>Zostera marina</i> and B) <i>Ruppia maritima</i>. The figure was produced from the data shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0083804#pone-0083804-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a>. <i>Ulva intestinalis</i> was excluded from regression analysis, as O<sub>2</sub> conditions had no significant effect on its photosynthetic rates. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0083804#pone-0083804-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a> for DIC and O<sub>2</sub> contents of seawater at each pH value.</p