26 research outputs found

    Charge Localization and Ordering in A2_2Mn8_8O16_{16} Hollandite Group Oxides: Impact of Density Functional Theory Approaches

    Full text link
    The phases of A2_2Mn8_8O16_{16} hollandite group oxides emerge from the competition between ionic interactions, Jahn-Teller effects, charge ordering, and magnetic interactions. Their balanced treatment with feasible computational approaches can be challenging for commonly used approximations in Density Functional Theory. Three examples (A = Ag, Li and K) are studied with a sequence of different approximate exchange-correlation functionals. Starting from a generalized gradient approximation (GGA), an extension to include van der Waals interactions and a recently proposed meta-GGA are considered. Then local Coulomb interactions for the Mn 3d3d electrons are more explicitly considered with the DFT+UU approach. Finally selected results from a hybrid functional approach provide a reference. Results for the binding energy of the A species in the parent oxide highlight the role of van der Waals interactions. Relatively accurate results for insertion energies can be achieved with a low UU and a high UU approach. In the low UU case, the materials are described as band metals with a high symmetry, tetragonal crystal structure. In the high UU case, the electrons donated by A result in formation of local Mn3+^{3+} centers and corresponding Jahn-Teller distortions characterized by a local order parameter. The resulting degree of monoclinic distortion depends on charge ordering and magnetic interactions in the phase formed. The reference hybrid functional results show charge localization and ordering. Comparison to low temperature experiments of related compounds suggests that charge localization is the physically correct result for the hollandite group oxides studied here. . . .Comment: 16 pages, 8 figure

    Comparisons of pH, total alkalinity, and O<sub>2</sub> concentration in nested ANOVAs for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites and in both waterbody types, i.e., bay and baymouth.

    No full text
    <p>Comparisons of pH, total alkalinity, and O<sub>2</sub> concentration in nested ANOVAs for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites and in both waterbody types, i.e., bay and baymouth.</p

    A summary of pH and DIC components of baymouth water and bay water from both sampling sites, i.e., Skallhavet and Fiskebäckskil.

    No full text
    <p>A summary of pH and DIC components of baymouth water and bay water from both sampling sites, i.e., Skallhavet and Fiskebäckskil.</p

    Comparisons of gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses measured in bay water with two different O<sub>2</sub> levels, i.e., natural and low O<sub>2</sub> concentration for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites in repeated-measures ANOVA.

    No full text
    <p>Comparisons of gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses measured in bay water with two different O<sub>2</sub> levels, i.e., natural and low O<sub>2</sub> concentration for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites in repeated-measures ANOVA.</p

    Gross photosynthetic rates as a function of pH under natural versus O<sub>2</sub>-depleted conditions.

    No full text
    <p>A) <i>Zostera marina</i>, B) <i>Ruppia maritima</i>, and C) <i>Ulva intestinalis</i>. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0083804#pone-0083804-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a> for Total DIC and O<sub>2</sub> contents of seawater at each pH value.</p

    Total seawater DIC and O<sub>2</sub> contents at the pH values used in the experiments.

    No full text
    <p>Total seawater DIC and O<sub>2</sub> contents at the pH values used in the experiments.</p

    Comparisons of gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses measured in different types of waterbody, i.e., bay water, baymouth water and CO<sub>2</sub>-purged bay water for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites in repeated-measures ANOVA.

    No full text
    <p>Comparisons of gross photosynthetic rates of seagrasses measured in different types of waterbody, i.e., bay water, baymouth water and CO<sub>2</sub>-purged bay water for both the Skallhavet and the Fiskebäckskil sites in repeated-measures ANOVA.</p

    Percentage reduction of gross photosynthetic rates under photorespiratory conditions as a function of pH.

    No full text
    <p>A) <i>Zostera marina</i> and B) <i>Ruppia maritima</i>. The figure was produced from the data shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0083804#pone-0083804-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a>. <i>Ulva intestinalis</i> was excluded from regression analysis, as O<sub>2</sub> conditions had no significant effect on its photosynthetic rates. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0083804#pone-0083804-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a> for DIC and O<sub>2</sub> contents of seawater at each pH value.</p
    corecore