More than a participant in trials of cell and gene therapy: Hearing the voices of people living with neurodegenerative diseases

With the advent of novel advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) for neurodegenerative diseases, their pathway to clinical trials and the therapeutic landscape has highlighted some new challenges, many of which are outlined in other chapters of this volume. The practical considerations of all these aspects from basic research and animal models through to clinical trials and eventual clinical implementation are significant. By and large, the major voices surrounding these challenges are the scientists and clinical teams who both develop the interventions and design and deliver the clinical trials to test these novel ATMPs. Their expertise is of course essential, but there is a key voice that can add considerable benefit to the pipeline, that of the lived experience of the disease being treated and the new intervention being considered. While still in their relative infancy in neurodegenerative disease, some ATMPs are already in clinical application in other disease areas, mainly cancer and inherited disorders. This more advanced status has raised some interesting questions about the role of the patient voice across all aspects of the therapeutic research and clinical delivery pipeline. This chapter highlights what has been learnt from the patient voice in their understanding and perspectives of ATMPs and in their experiences of clinical trials in neurodegenerative diseases to date. We discuss when, and how, including people living with neurodegenerative disease is of value in the development and implementation of ATMPs and the questions this collaborative effort can allow us to answer

What Patients Say: Large-Scale Analyses of Replies to the Parkinsons Disease Patient Report of Problems (PD-PROP).

BACKGROUND: Free-text, verbatim replies in the words of people with Parkinsons disease (PD) have the potential to provide unvarnished information about their feelings and experiences. Challenges of processing such data on a large scale are a barrier to analyzing verbatim data collection in large cohorts. OBJECTIVE: To develop a method for curating responses from the Parkinsons Disease Patient Report of Problems (PD-PROP), open-ended questions that asks people with PD to report their most bothersome problems and associated functional consequences. METHODS: Human curation, natural language processing, and machine learning were used to develop an algorithm to convert verbatim responses to classified symptoms. Nine curators including clinicians, people with PD, and a non-clinician PD expert classified a sample of responses as reporting each symptom or not. Responses to the PD-PROP were collected within the Fox Insight cohort study. RESULTS: Approximately 3,500 PD-PROP responses were curated by a human team. Subsequently, approximately 1,500 responses were used in the validation phase; median age of respondents was 67 years, 55% were men and median years since PD diagnosis was 3 years. 168,260 verbatim responses were classified by machine. Accuracy of machine classification was 95% on a held-out test set. 65 symptoms were grouped into 14 domains. The most frequently reported symptoms at first report were tremor (by 46% of respondents), gait and balance problems (>39%), and pain/discomfort (33%). CONCLUSION: A human-in-the-loop method of curation provides both accuracy and efficiency, permitting a clinically useful analysis of large datasets of verbatim reports about the problems that bother PD patients

Multiple N-of-1 trials to investigate hypoxia therapy in Parkinson’s disease: study rationale and protocol

Background Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease, for which no disease-modifying therapies exist. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that hypoxia-based therapy might have short- and long-term benefits in PD. We present the contours of the first study to assess the safety, feasibility and physiological and symptomatic impact of hypoxia-based therapy in individuals with PD. Methods/Design In 20 individuals with PD, we will investigate the safety, tolerability and short-term symptomatic efficacy of continuous and intermittent hypoxia using individual, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled N-of-1 trials. This design allows for dose finding and for including more individualized outcomes, as each individual serves as its own control. A wide range of exploratory outcomes is deployed, including the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III, Timed Up & Go Test, Mini Balance Evaluation Systems (MiniBES) test and wrist accelerometry. Also, self-reported impression of overall symptoms, motor and non-motor symptoms and urge to take dopaminergic medication will be assessed on a 10-point Likert scale. As part of a hypothesis-generating part of the study, we also deploy several exploratory outcomes to probe possible underlying mechanisms of action, including cortisol, erythropoietin and platelet-derived growth factor β. Efficacy will be assessed primarily by a Bayesian analysis. Discussion This evaluation of hypoxia therapy could provide insight in novel pathways that may be pursued for PD treatment. This trial also serves as a proof of concept for deploying an N-of-1 design and for including individualized outcomes in PD research, as a basis for personalized treatment approaches. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05214287 (registered January 28, 2022).Health and Social Development, Faculty of (Okanagan)Non UBCHealth and Exercise Sciences, School of (Okanagan)ReviewedFacultyResearche