3 research outputs found
Parental access to hospitalised children during infectious disease pandemics such as COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in many hospitals severely limiting or denying parents access to their hospitalised children. This
article provides guidance for hospital managers, healthcare staff, district-level managers and provincial managers on parental access to
hospitalised children during a pandemic such as COVID-19. It: (i) summarises legal and ethical issues around parental visitation rights;
(ii) highlights four guiding principles; (iii) provides 10 practical recommendations to facilitate safe parental access to hospitalised children;
(iv) highlights additional considerations if the mother is COVID-19-positive; and (v) provides considerations for fathers. In summary, it
is a child’s right to have access to his or her parents during hospitalisation, and parents should have access to their hospitalised children;
during an infectious disease pandemic such as COVID-19, there is a responsibility to ensure that parental visitation is implemented in a
reasonable and safe manner. Separation should only occur in exceptional circumstances, e.g. if adequate in-hospital facilities do not exist
to jointly accommodate the parent/caregiver and the newborn/infant/child. Both parents should be allowed access to hospitalised children,
under strict infection prevention and control (IPC) measures and with implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs),
including handwashing/sanitisation, face masks and physical distancing. Newborns/infants and their parents/caregivers have a reasonably
high likelihood of having similar COVID-19 status, and should be managed as a dyad rather than as individuals. Every hospital should
provide lodger/boarder facilities for mothers who are COVID-19-positive, COVID-19-negative or persons under investigation (PUI),
separately, with stringent IPC measures and NPIs. If facilities are limited, breastfeeding mothers should be prioritised, in the following
order: (i) COVID-19-negative; (ii) COVID-19 PUI; and (iii) COVID-19-positive. Breastfeeding, or breastmilk feeding, should be promoted,
supported and protected, and skin-to-skin care of newborns with the mother/caregiver (with IPC measures) should be discussed and
practised as far as possible. Surgical masks should be provided to all parents/caregivers and replaced daily throughout the hospital stay.
Parents should be referred to social services and local community resources to ensure that multidisciplinary support is provided. Hospitals
should develop individual-level policies and share these with staff and parents. Additionally, hospitals should ideally track the effect of
parental visitation rights on hospital-based COVID-19 outbreaks, the mental health of hospitalised children, and their rate of recovery.South African Medical Research Councilhttp://www.samj.org.zaPaediatrics and Child Healt
The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa consensus statement on ICU triage and rationing (ConICTri)
BACKGROUND: In South Africa (SA), intensive care is faced with the challenge of resource scarcity as well as an increasing demand for intensive
care unit (ICU) services. ICU services are expensive, and practitioners in low- to middle-income countries experience daily the consequences
of limited resources. Critically limited resources necessitate that rationing and triage (prioritisation) decisions are frequently necessary in SA,
particularly in the publicly funded health sector.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this consensus statement is to examine key questions that arise when considering the status of ICU resources in SA,
and more specifically ICU admission, rationing and triage decisions. The accompanying guideline in this issue is intended to guide frontline
triage policy and ensure the best utilisation of intensive care in SA, while maintaining a fair distribution of available resources. Fair and efficient
triage is important to ensure the ongoing provision of high-quality care to adult patients referred for intensive care.
RECOMMENDATIONS: In response to 14 key questions developed using a modified Delphi technique, 29 recommendations were formulated
and graded using an adapted GRADE score. The 14 key questions addressed the status of the provision of ICU services in SA, the degree of
resource restriction, the efficiency of resource management, the need for triage, and how triage could be most justly implemented. Important
recommendations included the need to formally recognise and accurately quantify the provision of ICU services in SA by national audit;
actively seek additional resources from governmental bodies; consider methods to maximise the efficiency of ICU care; evaluate lower level of
care alternatives; develop a triage guideline to assist policy-makers and frontline practitioners to implement triage decisions in an efficient and
fair way; measure and audit the consequence of triage; and promote research to improve the accuracy and consistency of triage decisions. The
consensus document and guideline should be reviewed and revised appropriately within 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: In recognition of the absolute need to limit patient access to ICU because of the lack of sufficient intensive care resources in public
hospitals, recommendations and a guideline have been developed to guide policy-making and assist frontline triage decision-making in SA. These
documents are not a complete plan for quality practice but rather the beginning of a long-term initiative to engage clinicians, the public and
administrators in appropriate triage decision-making, and promote systems that will ultimately maximise the efficient and fair use of available
ICU resources.http://www.samj.org.zapm2020SurgeryCritical Car
Critical care admission of South African (SA) surgical patients: Results of the SA Surgical Outcomes Study
Background. Appropriate critical care admissions are an important component of surgical care. However, there are few data describing postoperative critical care admission in resource-limited low- and middle-income countries.Objective. To describe the demographics, organ failures, organ support and outcomes of non-cardiac surgical patients admitted to critical care units in South Africa (SA).Methods. The SA Surgical Outcomes Study (SASOS) was a 7-day national, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of all patients ≥16 years of age undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery between 19 and 26 May 2014 at 50 government-funded hospitals. All patients admitted to critical care units during this study were included for analysis.Results. Of the 3 927 SASOS patients, 255 (6.5%) were admitted to critical care units; of these admissions, 144 (56.5%) were planned, and 111 (43.5%) unplanned. The incidence of confirmed or strongly suspected infection at the time of admission was 35.4%, with a significantly higher incidence in unplanned admissions (49.1 v. 24.8%, p<0.001). Unplanned admission cases were more frequently hypovolaemic, had septic shock, and required significantly more inotropic, ventilatory and renal support in the first 48 hours after admission. Overall mortality was 22.4%, with unplanned admissions having a significantly longer critical care length of stay and overall mortality (33.3 v. 13.9%, p<0.001).Conclusion. The outcome of patients admitted to public sector critical care units in SA is strongly associated with unplanned admissions. Adequate ‘high care-dependency units’ for postoperative care of elective surgical patients could potentially decrease the burden on critical care resources in SA by 23%. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02141867)