External counterpulsation therapy improves endothelial function in patients with refractory angina pectoris

AbstractObjectivesThe goal of this study was to investigate the influence of short-term external counterpulsation (ECP) therapy on flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundIn patients with CAD, the vascular endothelium is usually impaired and modification or reversal of endothelial dysfunction may significantly enhance treatment. Although ECP therapy reduces angina and improves exercise tolerance in patients with CAD, its short-term effects on FMD in patients with refractory angina pectoris have not yet been described.MethodsWe prospectively assessed endothelial function in 20 consecutive CAD patients (15 males), mean age 68 ± 11 years, with refractory angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] angina class III to IV), unsuitable for coronary revascularization, before and after ECP, and compared them with 20 age- and gender-matched controls. Endothelium-dependent brachial artery FMD and endothelium-independent nitroglycerin (NTG)-mediated vasodilation were assessed before and after ECP therapy, using high-resolution ultrasound.ResultsExternal counterpulsation therapy resulted in significant improvement in post-intervention FMD (8.2 ± 2.1%, p = 0.01), compared with controls (3.1 ± 2.2%, p = 0.78). There was no significant effect of treatment on NTG-induced vasodilation between ECP and controls (10.7 ± 2.8% vs. 10.2 ± 2.4%, p = 0.85). External counterpulsation significantly improved anginal symptoms assessed by reduction in mean sublingual daily nitrate consumption, compared with controls (4.2 ± 2.7 nitrate tablets vs. 0.4 ± 0.5 nitrate tablets, p <0.001 and 4.5 ± 2.3 nitrate tablets vs. 4.4 ± 2.6 nitrate tablets, p = 0.87, respectively) and in mean CCS angina class compared with controls (3.5 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3, p <0.0001 and 3.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.5 ± 0.5, p = 0.89, respectively).ConclusionsExternal counterpulsation significantly improved vascular endothelial function in CAD patients with refractory angina pectoris, thereby suggesting that improved anginal symptoms may be the result of such a mechanism

The distinction between coronary and myocardial reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy by clinical markers of reperfusion

AbstractObjectives. We sought to examine the hypothesis that rapid resolution of ST-segment elevation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with early peak creatine kinase (CK) after thrombolytic therapy differentiates among patients with early recanalization between those with and those without adequate tissue (myocardial) reperfusion.Background. Early recanalization of the epicardial infarct-related artery (IRA) during AMI does not ensure adequate reperfusion on the myocardial level. While early peak CK after thrombolysis results from early and abrupt restoration of the coronary flow to the infarcted area, rapid ST-segment resolution, which is another clinical marker of successful reperfusion, reflects changes of the myocardial tissue itself.Methods. We compared the clinical and the angiographic results of 162 AMI patients with early peak CK (≤12 h) after thrombolytic therapy with (group A) and without (group B) concomitant rapid resolution of ST-segment elevation.Results. Patients in groups A and B had similar patency rates of the IRA on angiography (anterior infarction: 93% vs. 93%; inferior infarction: 89% vs. 77%). Nevertheless, group A versus B patients had lower peak CK (anterior infarction: 1,083 ± 585 IU/ml vs. 1,950 ± 1,216, p < 0.01; and inferior infarction: 940 ± 750 IU/ml vs. 1,350 ± 820, p = 0.18) and better left ventricular ejection fraction (anterior infarction: 49 ± 8, vs. 44 ± 8, p < 0.01; inferior infarction: 56 ± 12 vs. 51 ± 10, p = 0.1). In a 2-year follow-up, group A as compared with group B patients had a lower rate of congestive heart failure (1% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) and mortality (2% vs. 13%, p < 0.01).Conclusions. Among patients in whom reperfusion appears to have taken place using an early peak CK as a marker, the coexistence of rapid resolution of ST-segment elevation further differentiates among patients with an opened culprit artery between the ones with and without adequate myocardial reperfusion

Bezafibrate treatment is associated with a reduced rate of re-hospitalization in smokers after acute coronary syndrome

Background: Significantly increased rate of hospitalizations in current smokers is a major smoking-related problem which is associated with a heavy economic burden, whereas car­diovascular disease accounted for nearly half of hospitalizations. The effect of bezafibrate on the rate of re-hospitalization in smokers already treated with statin immediately post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate 30-day rate of re-hospitalization in current smokers participating in the ACS Israeli Surveys (ACSIS) and who were treated on discharge with a bezafibrate/statin combination vs. statin alone. Methods: The study population comprised 3392 patients with confirmed current smoking status from the ACSIS 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2010 enrollment waves who were alive on discharge and received statin. Of these, 3189 (94%) were discharged with statin alone, 203 (6%) with a combination of a statin and bezafibrate. Results: Thirty-day re-hospitalization rate was significantly lower in patients from the com­bination group than in their counterparts from the statin monotherapy group: 12.8% vs. 19%, p = 0.028. Multivariable analysis identified the combined bezafibrate/statin treatment as an independent predictor of reduced risk of 30-day re-hospitalization rate with odds ratio (OR) 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31–0.91), and it corresponded to 47% risk reduction. Other significant variables in our model associated with independent risk of 30-day re-hospi­talization rate during the follow-up were female gender (OR 1.43, CI 1.05–1.95, p = 0.03) and age &gt; 65 years (OR 1.49, CI 1.13–1.95, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Adding bezafibrate to statin in smokers was associated with a significantly reduced 30-day rate of re-hospitalization after ACS.

Statin Efficacy and Safety for Lipid Modification in Apparently Healthy Male Military Aircrew

Introduction: Military aircrew men represent an elite group of relatively young, fit, and healthy people. The effectiveness of statin treatment in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) according to the current National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines, its safety, and compliance in this group of people has not yet been determined. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 84 military aircrew men (mean age 43 Ϯ 7 yr) with LDL-C above the current NCEP guidelines. The patients were divided into two groups according to their coronary risk factors: Group 1, LDL-C goal Ͻ 160 mg ⅐ dL Ϫ1 ; Group 2, LDL-C goal Ͻ 130 mg ⅐ dL Ϫ1 . All patients received statins in addition to therapeutic lifestyle changes and were followed for a mean of 3 Ϯ 1 yr according to a simple flow chart. Lipoprotein levels, liver function tests, creatinine phosphokinase, and subjective adverse reactions were checked periodically. Results: LDL-C significantly declined by 32% (p Ͻ 0.0001) within the first month of treatment and 99% of subjects achieved their LDL-C goal within 114 Ϯ 35 d from statin therapy initiation. The Framingham estimated 10-yr coronary risk showed a reduction at an average of 12 mo after statin therapy initiation from a baseline value of 6.54% to 3.95% (p ϭ 0.003). No subjects were grounded or disqualified from duty, there were no cardiovascular events during follow-up, and compliance to therapy was high [82/84 (98%)]. Discussion: Statin treatment in this highly select, relatively young group of aircrew men significantly and safely lowered LDL-C cholesterol levels

Cardiovascular Events in Patients Received Combined Fibrate/Statin Treatment versus Statin Monotherapy: Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys Data

The effect of combination of fibrate with statin on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) hospitalization is unclear. The main aim of this study was to investigate the 30-day rate of MACE in patients who participated in the nationwide ACS Israeli Surveys (ACSIS) and were treated on discharge with a fibrate (mainly bezafibrate) and statin combination vs. statin alone.The study population comprised 8,982 patients from the ACSIS 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2010 enrollment waves who were alive on discharge and received statin. Of these, 8,545 (95%) received statin alone and 437 (5%) received fibrate/statin combination. MACE was defined as a composite measure of death, recurrent MI, recurrent ischemia, stent thrombosis, ischemic stroke and urgent revascularization.Patients from the combination group were younger (58.1±11.9 vs. 62.9±12.6 years). However, they had significantly more co-morbidities (hypertension, diabetes), current smokers and unfavorable cardio-metabolic profiles (with respect to glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol). Development of MACE was recorded in 513 (6.0%) patients from the statin monotherapy group vs. 13 (3.2%) from the combination group, p = 0.01. 30-day re-hospitalization rate was significantly lower in the combination group: 68 (15.6%) vs. 1691 (19.8%) of patients, respectively; p = 0.03. Multivariable analysis identified the fibrate/statin combination as an independent predictor of reduced risk of MACE with odds ratio of 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.32–0.94.A significantly lower risk of 30-day MACE rate was observed in patients receiving combined fibrate/statin treatment following ACS compared with statin monotherapy. However, caution should be exercised in interpreting these findings taking into consideration baseline differences between our observational study groups

Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 2010/2011: current status in 37 ESC countries

Aims Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the preferred reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We conducted this study to evaluate the contemporary status on the use and type of reperfusion therapy in patients admitted with STEMI in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) member countries. Methods and results A cross-sectional descriptive study based on aggregated country-level data on the use of reperfusion therapy in patients admitted with STEMI during 2010 or 2011. Thirty-seven ESC countries were able to provide data from existing national or regional registries. In countries where no such registries exist, data were based on best expert estimates. Data were collected on the use of STEMI reperfusion treatment and mortality, the numbers of cardiologists, and the availability of PPCI facilities in each country. Our survey provides a brief data summary of the degree of variation in reperfusion therapy across Europe. The number of PPCI procedures varied between countries, ranging from 23 to 884 per million inhabitants. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis were the dominant reperfusion strategy in 33 and 4 countries, respectively. The mean population served by a single PPCI centre with a 24-h service 7 days a week ranged from 31 300 inhabitants per centre to 6 533 000 inhabitants per centre. Twenty-seven of the total 37 countries participated in a former survey from 2007, and major increases in PPCI utilization were observed in 13 of these countries. Conclusion Large variations in reperfusion treatment are still present across Europe. Countries in Eastern and Southern Europe reported that a substantial number of STEMI patients are not receiving any reperfusion therapy. Implementation of the best reperfusion therapy as recommended in the guidelines should be encourage

Nephropathy induced by contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies

WITH THE INCREASING USE OF CONTRAST MEDIA in diagnostic and interventional procedures, nephropathy induced by contrast media has become the third leading cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. It is also associated with a significant risk of morbidity and death. The current understanding of the pathogenesis indicates that contrast-medium nephropathy is caused by a combination of renal ischemia and direct toxic effects on renal tubular cells. Patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure are at highest risk. Risk factors also include the type and amount of contrast medium administered. Therapeutic prevention strategies are being extensively investigated, but there is still no definitive answer. In this article, we review the current evidence on the causes, pathogenesis and clinical course of contrast-medium nephropathy as well as therapeutic approaches to its prevention evaluated in clinical trials