18 research outputs found

    Erratum: Balancing ischaemia and bleeding risks with novel oral anticoagulants

    No full text

    Remote Patient Monitoring for Patients with Heart Failure: Sex- and Race-based Disparities and Opportunities

    Get PDF
    Remote patient monitoring (RPM), within the larger context of telehealth expansion, has been established as an effective and safe means of care for patients with heart failure (HF) during the recent pandemic. Of the demographic groups, female patients and black patients are under-enrolled relative to disease distribution in clinical trials and are under-referred for RPM, including remote haemodynamic monitoring, cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), wearables and telehealth interventions. The sex- and race-based disparities are multifactorial: stringent clinical trial inclusion criteria, distrust of the medical establishment, poor access to healthcare, socioeconomic inequities, and lack of diversity in clinical trial leadership. Notwithstanding addressing the above factors, RPM has the unique potential to reduce disparities through a combination of implicit bias mitigation and earlier detection and intervention for HF disease progression in disadvantaged groups. This review describes the uptake of remote haemodynamic monitoring, CIEDs and telehealth in female patients and black patients with HF, and discusses aetiologies that may contribute to inequities and strategies to promote health equity

    Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is unclear, and its risks and benefits may vary according to DES generation. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAPT after DES implantation. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials that tested different durations of DAPT after DES implantation: shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (S-DAPT) was defined as the per-protocol minimum duration of DAPT after the procedure, and longer dual antiplatelet therapy (L-DAPT) was defined as the per-protocol period of more prolonged DAPT. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were definite/probable stent thrombosis and clinically significant bleeding (CSB), respectively. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials (N = 32,135) were included. Compared with L-DAPT, S-DAPT had an overall higher rate of stent thrombosis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26 to 2.32]; p = 0.001). The effect of S-DAPT on stent thrombosis was attenuated with the use of second-generation DES (OR: 1.54 [95% CI: 0.96 to 2.47]) compared with the use of first-generation DES (OR: 3.94 [95% CI: 2.20 to 7.05]; p for interaction = 0.008). S-DAPT had an overall significantly lower risk of CSB (OR: 0.63 [95% CI: 0.52 to 0.75]; p < 0.001). Finally, a numerically lower all-cause mortality rate was observed with S-DAPT (OR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.74 to 1.01]; p = 0.073). CONCLUSIONS: S-DAPT had overall lower rates of bleeding yet higher rates of stent thrombosis compared with L-DAPT; the latter effect was significantly attenuated with the use of second-generation DES, although the analysis may have been limited by the varying DAPT durations among studies. All-cause mortality was numerically higher with L-DAPT without reaching statistical significance. Prolonging DAPT requires careful assessment of the trade-off between ischemic and bleeding complications

    Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and End Stage Renal Disease and Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device: Insights from United States Renal Data System Database

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data regarding durable LVAD outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 and CKD stage 5 on dialysis (ESRD: end stage renal disease). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD and 5% sample of CKD with LVAD (2006 to 2018) to determine one-year outcomes utilizing the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database. The LVAD implantation, comorbidities and outcomes were identified using appropriate ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. RESULTS: We identified 496 CKD and 95 ESRD patients who underwent LVAD implantation. The ESRD patients were younger (59 vs 66 years; p CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD undergoing LVAD implantation had significantly higher index and 1-year mortality compared to CKD patients
    corecore