96 research outputs found
The Alien City chronotope within the scope of Toni Morrisonβs Jazz
The research observes the representation of the alien city chronotope in Jazz (1992) by a contemporary
American writer Toni Morrison. The narration of the novel occurs in Harlem (New York) in the 1920-s,
however, because most charactersβ identities originate in the mid-19th-century American South, time and space
frames extend. Focusing on the city space in the novel Jazz we regard the city as a social and cultural
phenomenon of America, an independent live character that enters into a dialogue with the novelβs protagonists
and, at the same time, contributes to their alienation within its frames. Harlem of 1920s functions not only as
sociohistorical background but also as a unique narrator that relates the urban experience of African-
Americans. We deduce that the chronotope exhibited in the novel in question combines several places and
embodies narration about protagonistsβ roots, their original habitat and a new conflicting environment that
both attracts and repels them. The intrinsic ties of time and space in the literary work discussed in the article
are presented on the level of the city, which represents alien and fragmentized reality. Thus we are convinced
that the alien city chronotope in the novel is shaped by the opposition of ethnic and cultural identities of
characters within their changing world. The charactersβ illusions and aspirations are guided by the dubious
and forceful voice of the city and none of the protagonists is able to escape the traumatic labyrinth of time and
space tracing their memory
TRADITIONS AND PARADIGMS OF RESEARCH IDENTITY
Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΌΡ, Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π² Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ΅. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΡ Π² Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ΅, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π² Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Π²Π»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π°. Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΌ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
Π² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. Π€ΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ, Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π°Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² Π΄ΡΡ
Π΅ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°.Π Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ, Ρ.ΠΊ. ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ, Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π·Π΄ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ, ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ.ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½Ρ Π΄Π²Π΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½Π° Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ½Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ.ΠΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°Ρ
ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ°Ρ
Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. Π ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΆΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ².The article deals with disciplinary paradigms, in the context of which the problem of identity was explored in the humanitarian discourse. The purpose of the article is to analyze the problematic situation of destructive pluralism and the fragmentation of disciplinary and conceptual approaches to the study of identity in modern humanitarian discourse, as well as possible ways to overcome it.By the method of critical analysis of the interpretations of the pluralism of concepts of identity existing in the literature and approaches to its study, the author establishes that the problematic nature of this pluralism is due to the real crisis of personality identity in postmodern society. The modern postmodern identity crisis corresponds to the fragmentation and pluralism of disciplinary approaches and intradisciplinary paradigms used in the study of identity. Fragmented, discrete pluralism of modern studies of identity is often combined with relativization of identity, absolutization of its fluidity and variability in the spirit of the philosophical principles of postmodernism.The implementation of interdisciplinarity in practice turns out to be problematic, since opens not only new opportunities, but also new problems and limitations. Far more problematic than interdisciplinary integration is the intradisciplinary conceptual integration of identity research approaches.The author comes to the conclusion that there are two main models for overcoming destructive pluralism and the fragmentation of identity studies. The first model is maintained in the context of the principles of postmodern philosophy and postnonclassical standards of scientific rationality.The second model for overcoming destructive pluralism and the fragmentation of identity studies is based on the principles and standards of humanitarian classical scientific rationality. The second model is based on the creation of a holistic integral concept of identity based on a productive philosophical paradigm and interdisciplinary integration of existing approaches
ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠ§ΠΠΠ‘Π’Π ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ
The transformation of identity in the postmodern creates serious difficulties for the orientation of the individual in the socio-cultural space and self-identification. In postmodern society, the very question of the identity of the individual is problematic, since it depends not only on the real transformations of personal identification, but also on the philosophical and methodological attitudes of thinkers who are trying to analyze these processes.The aim of the study is to analyze the methodological and ideological foundations of the postmodern concept of transformation of personality identity. The research methodology involves verification of the postmodern concept of identity by comparing it with the actual changes in personal identification in the culture of postmodernism.It has been established that the methodological foundations of the postmodern concept of identity are determined by the deconstruction method developed by French postmodernists (J. Derrida and others). In terms of ideology, postmodernism affirms the fundamental equality of all values and thereby effectively devalues any specific values.The methodological and ideological foundations of the postmodern concept of identity transformation in the postmodern era are one-sided focus on the moments of relativism, the nihilism of this process to the detriment of the moments of substantiality and positive constructivism.The philosophy of postmodernism is a perverse reflection of the historical dynamics of society and the individual during the transition from industrial to postindustrial society, since it absolutes only one side of this process β the destruction of traditional socio-cultural systems and structures, including the individual.Π’ΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π·Π½ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΡΡΡΠ΄Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π° ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ° Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΠ± ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΡ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ·Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊ ΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ.Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ·Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°Π΅Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π°.Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ (Π. ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ΄Π° ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅). Π ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ·Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΡΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π»ΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ.ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ·Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΠΏΠΎΡ
Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π° ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π΅ΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Ρ
ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°, Π½ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° Π² ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ± ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌ ΡΡΠ±ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°.Π€ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΎΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Ρ, ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΡ Π°Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° β ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠΠΠΠ Π Π ΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠ§ΠΠΠ‘Π’Π¬: ΠΠΠ¬Π’ΠΠ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠ«Π ΠΠΠ’ΠΠ ΠΠ ΠΠ’ΠΠ¦ΠΠ
In the postmodern era, identity becomes problematic. The aim of the study is to analyze the reflection of the crisis of the traditional identity of the individual. The method of work is a comparative analysis of alternative interpretations of the transformation of the identity of the individual in the socio-cultural situation of the postmodern and in the philosophical self-consciousness of the postmodern.The position of apologists and adherents of postmodern transformations is that the old traditional identity and limited classical humanism are leaving the postmodern society, and a new humanism and a new postmodern identity is coming. The position of critics of postmodernists, defenders of traditionalism interprets the crisis of traditional identity in postmodern society as a fundamental crisis of the humanistic essence of identity, the destruction of the identity of the individual as such.Common to both positions is the recognition of the crisis of traditional identity and classical humanism. Postmodern apologists emphasize that as a result of this process, a new, higher form of postmodern identity is born, which is viewed as a project built by the personality itself, which is completely free, creative, and allows the individual to gain full self-expression. Critics point out the destructive nature of postmodern identity transformations, which lead to the deformation not only of the processes of personal identification, but also to the formation of ineffective, flawed forms of identity.Comparing the positions of apologists and critics with actual identity transformations, the author argues that the crisis of classical humanism and traditional fundamentalist identity is accompanied by both the constructive potential of the formation of a new more humanistic identity and the potential threats of dehumanization and destruction of identity as such.Π ΡΠΏΠΎΡ
Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π° ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ. Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ° ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π» ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π° ΠΈ Π² ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π°.ΠΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π° ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ², Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠ½Π΄Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ.ΠΠ±ΡΠΈΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ° ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°. ΠΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ, Π²ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠ°ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ, Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π°Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΉ, ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅Π΄ΡΡ ΠΊ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
, ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ±Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ.Π‘ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ, ΡΡΠ½Π΄Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ³ΡΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π΅Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ
Nutritional correlates and dynamics of diabetes in the Nile rat (Arvicanthis niloticus): a novel model for diet-induced type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and related chronic diseases, among them non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus, are on the rise in the United States and throughout the world. Animal models that respond to environmental stressors, such as diet, are useful for investigating the outcome and development of these related diseases.</p> <p>Objective</p> <p>Within this context, growth and energy relationships were characterized in the Nile rat, an exotic African rodent, as a potential animal model for diet-induced type 2 diabetes mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Compiled data from several studies established the relationship between age, body weight gain (including abdominal adiposity), food and water consumption, and blood glucose levels as determinants of diabetes in male and female Nile rats. Glucose Tolerance Testing, insulin, HbA1c, blood pressure measurements and plasma lipids further characterized the diabetes in relation to criteria of the Metabolic Syndrome, while diet modification with high-fat, low-fiber or food restriction attempted to modulate the disease.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The Nile rat fed lab chow demonstrates signs of the Metabolic Syndrome that evolve into diet-induced non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus characterized by hyperinsulinemia with rising blood glucose (insulin resistance), abdominal adiposity, and impaired glucose clearance that precedes increased food and water intake, as well as elevated HbA1c, marked elevation in plasma triglycerides and cholesterol, microalbuminuria, and hypertension. Males are more prone than females with rapid progression to diabetes depending on the challenge diet. In males diabetes segregated into early-onset and late-onset groups, the former related to more rapid growth and greater growth efficiency for the calories consumed. Interestingly, no correlation was found between blood glucose and body mass index (overall adiposity) in older male Nile rats in long term studies, whereas blood glucose and the perirenal fat pad, as well as liver and kidney weight, were positively related to early-onset diabetes. Rats weaned early (4-5 wks) and challenged with a high-fat Western-type diet developed diabetes faster, and body fat accumulation was more apparent, whereas food restriction curtailed it.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Nile rat fed typical rodent diets develops hyperinsulinemia that precedes hyperglycemia (insulin resistance) leading to diet-induced type 2 diabetes associated with hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension. Dietary modulation affected growth rate (weight gain and central adiposity) to impact disease progression. This rodent model represents a novel system of gene-diet interactions affecting energy utilization that can provide insight into the prevention and treatment of the type 2 diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome.</p
Education-for-Myself and Education-for-the Other: The Right to Freedom of Education and Mikhail Bakhtinβs Experience
The article contains reflections on the problem which has arised in Eugene Matusov's article on freedom of education, and considers the experience of Mikhail Bakhtin as an example of the way the right to the freedom can be fulfilled. Not only Bakhtin's life and ideas play a significant role in contemporary social and educational theories and practices, but they reveal how education becomes a result of selection of particular knowledge and one's conscious choice. The core of the article is a correlation of notions βEducation-for-myselfβ and βEducation-for-the otherβ which are taken by the authors as derivatives of the terms of Bakhtinβs early philosophy βI-for-myselfβ and βI-for-the otherβ. Thus ideas of βEducation-for-an individualβ and βEducation-for-the societyβ result from the reflections and can be evidence of the need in mutual understanding and dialogue in order to achieve freedom of education
Consumption of Artificially-Sweetened Soft Drinks in Pregnancy and Risk of Child Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis
Background: Past evidence has suggested a role of artificial sweeteners in allergic disease; yet, the evidence has been inconsistent and unclear. Objective: To examine relation of intake of artificially-sweetened beverages during pregnancy with child asthma and allergic rhinitis at 18 months and 7 years. Methods: We analyzed data from 60,466 women enrolled during pregnancy in the prospective longitudinal Danish National Birth Cohort between 1996 and 2003. At the 25th week of gestation we administered a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire which asked in detail about intake of artificially-sweetened soft drinks. At 18 months, we evaluated child asthma using interview data. We also assessed asthma and allergic rhinitis through a questionnaire at age 7 and by using national registries. Current asthma was defined as self-reported asthma diagnosis and wheeze in the past 12 months. We examined the relation between intake of artificially-sweetened soft drinks and child allergic disease outcomes and present here odds ratios with 95% CI comparing daily vs. no intake. Results: At 18 months, we found that mothers who consumed more artificially-sweetened non-carbonated soft drinks were 1.23 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.33) times more likely to report a child asthma diagnosis compared to non-consumers. Similar results were found for child wheeze. Consumers of artificially-sweetened carbonated drinks were more likely to have a child asthma diagnosis in the patient (1.30, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.66) and medication (1.13, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.29) registry, as well as self-reported allergic rhinitis (1.31, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.74) during the first 7 years of follow-up. We found no associations for sugar-sweetened soft drinks. Conclusion: Carbonated artificially-sweetened soft drinks were associated with registry-based asthma and self-reported allergic rhinitis, while early childhood outcomes were related to non-carbonated soft drinks. These results suggest that consumption of artificially-sweetened soft drinks during pregnancy may play a role in offspring allergic disease development
Characterization of Dietary Patterns in the Danish National Birth Cohort in Relation to Preterm Birth
Background: Dietary patterns better reflect eating habits as opposed to single dietary components. However, the use of dietary pattern analysis in nutritional epidemiology has been hampered by the complexity of interpreting and presenting multidimensional dietary data. Methods: This study extracts and visualizes dietary patterns from self-reported dietary data collected in mid-pregnancy (25th week of gestation) from nearly 60,000 mother-child pairs part of a prospective, longitudinal cohort (Danish National Birth Cohort) and further examines their associations with spontaneous and induced preterm birth (gestational age<259 days (<37 weeks)). Results: A total of seven dietary patterns were extracted by principal component analysis, characterized and visualized by color-coded spider plots, and referred to as: Vegetables/Prudent, Alcohol, Western, Nordic, Seafood, Candy and Rice/Pasta/Poultry. A consistent dose-response association with preterm birth was only observed for Western diet with an odds ratio of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.49) comparing the highest to the lowest quintile. This association was primarily driven by induced preterm deliveries (odds ratio = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.11, comparing the highest to the lowest quintile) while the corresponding odds ratio for spontaneous preterm deliveries was more modest (odds ratio = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.39). All based on adjusted analyses. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study presented a simple and novel framework for visualizing correlation structures between overall consumption of foods group and their relation to nutrient intake and maternal characteristics. Our results suggest that Western-type diet, high in meat and fats and low in fruits and vegetables, is associated with increased odds of induced preterm birth
Oral corticosteroid (OCS) risk predictor for Type II Diabetes in asthma
Peer reviewedPostprin
A Comparison of Three Methods to Measure Asthma in Epidemiologic Studies: Results from the Danish National Birth Cohort
Asthma is a heterogeneous outcome and how the condition should be measured to best capture clinically relevant disease in epidemiologic studies remains unclear. We compared three methods of measuring asthma in the Danish National Birth Cohort (n>50.000). When the children were 7 years old, the prevalence of asthma was estimated from a self-administered questionnaire using parental report of doctor diagnoses, ICD-10 diagnoses from a population-based hospitalization registry, and data on anti-asthmatic medication from a population-based prescription registry. We assessed the agreement between the methods using kappa statistics. Highest prevalence of asthma was found using the prescription registry (32.2%) followed by the self-report (12.0%) and the hospitalization registry (6.6%). We found a substantial non-overlap between the methods (kappa = 0.21β0.38). When all three methods were combined the asthma prevalence was 3.6%. In conclusion, self-reported asthma, ICD-10 diagnoses from a hospitalization registry and data on anti-asthmatic medication use from a prescription registry lead to different prevalences of asthma in the same cohort of children. The non-overlap between the methods may be due to different abilities of the methods to identify cases with different phenotypes, in which case they should be treated as separate outcomes in future aetiological studies
- β¦