13 research outputs found
The S-Word: Discourse, Stereotypes, and the American Indian Woman
What’s in a name? Plenty when it comes to the ability of words to
establish identity. In 2005 in Oregon, for example, 142 land
features carried the name ‘‘squaw’’—Squaw Gulch, Squaw Butte,
Squaw Meadows, and Squaw Flat Reservoir (U.S. Geological
Survey, 2008). This article examines the term squaw, its presentation
in popular culture, and how this framing constructs Native
womanhood in the public imagination. Two primary representations
are revealed in the discourse defining squaw: as sexual
punching bag and as drudge. The opinions and attitudes of
reporters, citizens (Indian and non-Indian), government officials,
agencies, and tribal representatives are included as reflected in
journalistic accounts of the land form debate about the use and
meaning of the label squaw. The psychological impact of this racial
and sexual slur has a significant negative impact on quality of life,
perceptions, and opportunities for Native American women
(ethnostress) due to the consistent use and reification of the squaw
stereotype through more than 400 years of U.S. history. This article
is written as part of a larger body of work that argues for an
expansion of Schroeder and Borgerson’s (2005, 2008) representational
ethics of images to include words
Use of histological examination to assess ultrastructure of liver in patients with long standing jejuno-ileal bypass for morbid obesity.
Clinicopathologic study of alcohol-like liver disease in non-alcoholics; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis
In: Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) result in morbidity and mortality as well as placing a significant financial burden on health-care resources. In Europe and North America, they are responsible for approximately 6% of all hospital admissions. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly experience adverse drug reactions. Whilst the explosion of new IBD therapies has improved patient outcomes, ADRs remain a significant challenge and for many drugs the major cause of discontinuation. Most ADRs cannot currently be reliably predicted prior to starting treatment, and therefore clinical and laboratory monitoring, which is expensive and inconvenient for patients, is recommended for the duration of treatment. An ability to accurately predict an individual’s risk of developing an ADR prior to treatment may allow the dose to be altered or the drug avoided in at-risk individuals. Pharmacogenetic biomarkers are particularly attractive for the purpose of predicting ADRs as they are present at diagnosis and unaffected by disease phenotype, disease activity or other treatments. Discovery of these biomarkers has been made possible by the increasing availability of reliable, robust and cheap high throughput genotyping and sequencing platforms. In this chapter, we describe several inflammatory bowel disease ADR pharmacogenetic biomarkers, as well as the process of biomarker discovery and the barriers which hinder the successful ‘bench to the bedside’ translation of these tests into routine clinical care