10 research outputs found

    Remote Patient Monitoring for Patients with Heart Failure: Sex- and Race-based Disparities and Opportunities

    Get PDF
    Remote patient monitoring (RPM), within the larger context of telehealth expansion, has been established as an effective and safe means of care for patients with heart failure (HF) during the recent pandemic. Of the demographic groups, female patients and black patients are under-enrolled relative to disease distribution in clinical trials and are under-referred for RPM, including remote haemodynamic monitoring, cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), wearables and telehealth interventions. The sex- and race-based disparities are multifactorial: stringent clinical trial inclusion criteria, distrust of the medical establishment, poor access to healthcare, socioeconomic inequities, and lack of diversity in clinical trial leadership. Notwithstanding addressing the above factors, RPM has the unique potential to reduce disparities through a combination of implicit bias mitigation and earlier detection and intervention for HF disease progression in disadvantaged groups. This review describes the uptake of remote haemodynamic monitoring, CIEDs and telehealth in female patients and black patients with HF, and discusses aetiologies that may contribute to inequities and strategies to promote health equity

    Bmpr2 expression in PaSMCs obtained from WT or <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> mice.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Levels of <i>Bmpr2</i> mRNA were measured in WT (Bmpr2<sup>+/+</sup>) or <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs by qPCR using hydrolysis probes for <i>Bmpr2</i> exon junctions 6–7 and 12–13. <i>Bmpr2</i> mRNA levels were normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> and expressed as the fold-change relative to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+/+</i></sup> PaSMCs. *P < 0.01 compared to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+/+</i></sup> PaSMCs. (B) Immunoblots prepared from lysates of <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+/+</i></sup> and <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs were incubated with an antibody directed against the tail domain of Bmpr2 to detect Bmpr2‑WT or with an anti-GFP antibody to detect Bmpr2‑ΔTD. Immunoblots were subsequently incubated with an antibody directed against Gapdh as a control for protein loading. (C) Confocal microscopy image of a PaSMC transiently transfected with a plasmid directing expression of <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd</i></sup> and reacted with an anti-GFP antibody showing localization of Bmpr2‑ΔTD at the cell membrane.</p

    Bmpr2‑ΔTD contributes to BMP7 signaling in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs.

    No full text
    <p>(A) <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs were transfected with negative control siRNA (siNC), si<i>Bmpr2</i>‑ex12, or si<i>Egfp</i> (30 nM). After 48 h, the ability of BMP7 (10 ng/ml for 1.5 h) to induce <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> mRNA expression was measured by qPCR, normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> and expressed as fold-change relative to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs transfected with siNC. *P < 0.01 compared to siNC group treated with BMP7, <sup>†</sup> P<0.01 compared to si<i>Bmpr2</i>‑ex12 group treated with BMP7. Efficiency of silencing <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+</i></sup> (si<i>Bmpr2</i>‑ex12) and <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd</i></sup> (si<i>Egfp</i>) transcripts was measured by qPCR. (B) <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/flox</i></sup> and <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/del</i></sup> PaSMCs were treated with BMP4 or BMP7 (10 ng/ml) for 30 and 60 minutes, upon which the activation of Smad1/5/8 was evaluated by immunoblotting. Quantification of the Smad1/5/8 activation is plotted as the ratio of pSmad1/5/8 to total Smad1/5/8. (C) The ability of BMP4 or BMP7 to induce <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> gene expression in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/flox</i></sup> and <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/del</i></sup> PaSMCs was measured by qPCR, normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> and expressed as fold-change relative to untreated <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/flox</i></sup> PaSMCs. *P < 0.01 compared to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/flox</i></sup> PaSMC group treated with BMP7.</p

    Bmpr2‑TD attenuates Alk2‑mediated BMP7 signaling in PaSMCs.

    No full text
    <p>Alk3‑deficient <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs were transfected with specific siRNA to silence <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+</i></sup> (si<i>Bmpr2</i>‑ex12) or <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd</i></sup> (si<i>Egfp</i>) transcripts. After 48 h, the ability of BMP7 to induce <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> gene expression was measured by qPCR, normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> and expressed as fold-change relative to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup>; <i>Alk3</i><sup><i>del/del</i></sup> PaSMCs treated with siNC. *P < 0.01 compared to control cells (siNC) treated with BMP7. Silencing efficiency was quantified by qPCR.</p

    BMP7 signaling is enhanced in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Immunoblots of lysates of WT (Bmpr2<sup>+/+</sup>) or <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs treated with BMP4 or BMP7 (10 ng/ml) for various times were reacted with antibodies directed against phosphorylated and total Smad1/5/8. Quantification of the ratio of phosphorylated Smad1/5/8 to total Smad1/5/8 (analysis of 3 independent experiments) demonstrated that BMP4 signaling is similar in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+/+</i></sup> or <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs, whereas BMP7 signaling is greater in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs. *P<0.05 compared to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+/+</i></sup> PaSMC group treated with BMP7. <i>Id1</i> (B) and <i>Smad6</i> (C) mRNA levels were measured by qPCR in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+/+</i></sup> or <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs treated with BMP4 or BMP7 (10 ng/ml) for various times. <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> gene expression was normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> and expressed as fold-change relative to control <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+/+</i></sup> PaSMC group. *P < 0.01 compared to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>+/+</i></sup> PaSMC group treated with BMP7.</p

    BMP7 preferentially utilizes Alk2 in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs.

    No full text
    <p>(A) The ability of BMP4 or BMP7 (10 ng/ml for 1.5 h) to induce <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> gene expression, in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs deficient in Alk2 or expressing Alk2 was examined by qPCR. <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> gene expression was normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> and expressed as fold-change relative to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup><i>; Alk2</i><sup><i>flox/flox</i></sup> PaSMCs. *P < 0.01 compared to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup><i>; Alk2</i><sup><i>flox/flox</i></sup> PaSMCs treated with BMP7. (B) The ability of BMP4 or BMP7 (10 ng/ml for 1.5 h) to induce <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> gene expression, in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs deficient in Alk3 or expressing Alk3 was measured by qPCR. <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> gene expression was normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> and expressed as fold-change relative to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup><i>; Alk3</i><sup><i>flox/flox</i></sup> PaSMCs. *P < 0.01 compared to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup><i>; Alk3</i><sup><i>flox/flox</i></sup> PaSMC treated with BMP4.</p

    BMP7 signaling in <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> and <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/del</i></sup> PaSMCs does not depend on the presence of Acvr2a.

    No full text
    <p>(A) <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs were treated with a siRNA specific for <i>Acvr2a</i> transcripts. The ability of BMP4 or BMP7 (10 ng/ml for 1.5 h) to induce <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> gene expression was measured by qPCR, normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> and expressed as fold-change relative to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/+</i></sup> PaSMCs treated with siNC. *P < 0.01 compared to siNC within BMP treatment. Silencing efficiency was quantified by measuring <i>Acvr2a</i> mRNA levels. (B) <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/del</i></sup> PaSMCs were treated with si<i>Acvr2a</i>. The ability of BMP4 or BMP7 (10 ng/ml for 1.5 h) to induce <i>Id1</i> and <i>Smad6</i> gene expression was measured by qPCR, normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> and expressed as fold-change relative to <i>Bmpr2</i><sup><i>Δtd/del</i></sup> PaSMCs treated with siNC. *P < 0.01 compared to siNC within BMP treatment. <i>Acvr2a</i> silencing efficiency was measured by qPCR.</p
    corecore