43 research outputs found

    Drugs Associated With Ischemic Stroke: A Review for Clinicians.

    No full text
    Certain drugs may increase the risk of ischemic stroke (IS). Our goal was to review associations between frequently used drugs and IS. We created an initial list of frequently used drugs to search Pubmed/MEDLINE from 1966 to 2020 and reviewed phase III and IV data, case series, and drug authorities' safety warnings to assess a potential association with IS. Drugs were grouped according to the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. Predefined criteria were applied to establish a level of evidence for an association, from A (high level of evidence of association) to E (high level of evidence of absence of association). In addition, we assessed relative risks and reviewed potential mechanisms of IS facilitation. We assessed 81 drugs or drug classes from 11 World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Groups. We identified a high level of association for erythropoietin, combined contraceptives, oral estrogen replacement therapy, bevacizumab, tamoxifen, and antipsychotics and a moderate level for ponatinib, nilotinib, darunavir, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists. Drug dose and treatment duration may modify the risk. For a substantial number of drugs, we found no association, and for others, there were insufficient data to categorize risk. We identified a high level of association of IS with a limited number of drugs, a potential association with some, and a lack of data for others. The summarized information may help clinicians to estimate the contribution of a drug to an IS, to better assess drug benefit-risk ratios, and to support decisions about using specific drugs

    Effect of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic COVID-19 on Acute Ischemic Stroke Revascularization Outcomes.

    No full text
    The association of COVID-19 with higher bleeding risk and worse outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing revascularization may be related to the presence of infection symptoms. We aimed to assess the safety and outcomes of revascularization treatments in patients with AIS with asymptomatic COVID-19 (AS-COVID) or symptomatic COVID-19 (S-COVID). We conducted an international multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive AIS tested for SARS-CoV-2, receiving intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment between 2020 and 2021. We compared COVID-negative controls, AS-COVID, and S-COVID using multivariable regression. We assessed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage), mortality, and 3-month disability (modified Rankin Scale score). Among 15 124 patients from 105 centers (median age, 71 years; 49% men; 39% treated with intravenous thrombolysis only; and 61% with endovascular treatment±intravenous thrombolysis), 849 (5.6%) had COVID-19, of whom 395 (46%) were asymptomatic and 454 (54%) symptomatic. Compared with controls, both patients with AS-COVID and S-COVID had higher symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates (COVID-controls, 5%; AS-COVID, 7.6%; S-COVID, 9.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.43 [95% CI, 1.03-1.99]; aOR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.14-2.32], respectively). Only in patients with symptomatic infections, we observed a significant increase in mortality at 24 hours (COVID-controls, 1.3%; S-COVID, 4.8%; aOR, 2.97 [95% CI, 1.76-5.03]) and 3 months (COVID-controls, 19.5%; S-COVID, 40%; aOR, 2.64 [95% CI, 2.06-3.37]). Patients with COVID-19 had worse 3-month disability regardless of disease symptoms although disability was affected to a greater extent in symptomatic patients (aOR for worse modified Rankin Scale score shift: AS-COVID, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.03-1.51]; S-COVID, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.75-2.53]). S-COVID had lower successful recanalization (74.9% versus 85.6%; P<0.001), first pass recanalization (20.3% versus 28.3%; P=0.005), and a higher number of passes. In AIS undergoing revascularization treatments, both AS-COVID and S-COVID influence the risk of intracranial bleeding and worse clinical outcomes. The magnitude of this effect is more pronounced in symptomatic infections, which also present less favorable recanalization outcomes. These findings emphasize the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the prognosis of revascularized AIS independent of symptom status. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04895462

    Teaching Video Neuro Images: Candy sign

    No full text
    publishersversionpublishe

    Stroke in the stroke unit: Recognition, treatment and outcomes in a single-centre cohort.

    No full text
    In-hospital strokes (IHS) are associated with longer diagnosis times, treatment delays and poorer outcomes. Strokes occurring in the stroke unit have seldom been studied. Our aim was to assess the management of in-stroke-unit ischaemic stroke (ISUS) by analysing ISUS characteristics, delays in diagnosis, treatments and outcomes. Consecutive patients from the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne (ASTRAL), from January 2003 to June 2019, were classified as ISUS, other-IHS or community-onset stroke (COS). Baseline and stroke characteristics, time to imaging and time to treatment, missed treatment opportunities, treatment rates and outcomes were compared using multivariate analysis with adjustment for relevant clinical, imaging and laboratory data available in ASTRAL. Amongst the 3456 patients analysed, 138 (4.0%) were ISUS, 214 (6.2%) other-IHS and 3104 (89.8%) COS. In multivariate analysis, patients with ISUS more frequently had known stroke onset time than other-IHS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-4.35) or COS (aOR 2.56; 95% CI 1.59-4.17), had fewer missed treatment opportunities than other-IHS (aOR 0.22; 95% CI 0.06-0.86) and higher endovascular treatment (EVT) rates than COS (aOR 3.03; 95% CI 1.54-5.88). ISUS was associated with a favourable shift in the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months in comparison with other-IHS (aOR 1.73; 95% CI 1.11-2.69) or COS (aOR 1.46; 95% CI 1.00-2.12). In-stroke-unit ischaemic stroke more frequently had known stroke onset time than other-IHS or COS, fewer missed treatment opportunities than other-IHS and a higher EVT rate than COS. This readiness to identify and treat patients in the stroke unit may explain the better long-term outcome of ISUS

    Thrombectomy and Thrombolysis of Isolated Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion: Cognitive, Visual, and Disability Outcomes.

    No full text
    Background and Purpose- We investigated efficacy and safety of acute revascularization with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT) in ischemic stroke from isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion, by assessing recanalization, disability, visual, cognitive outcomes, and hemorrhagic complications. Methods- For this retrospective single-center cohort study, we selected all consecutive patients with stroke with isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion from the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne registry between January 2003 and July 2018, and compared (1) IVT with conservative treatment (CTr) and (2) EVT to best medical therapy (BMT, ie, CTr or IVT) in terms of 3-month disability and visual field defect, and cognitive domains impaired after stroke. Unadjusted analysis, multivariable logistic regression, and propensity score matched analyses were performed. Results- Among 106 patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion, 21 received EVT (13 bridging), 34 IVT alone, and 51 CTr. Median age was 76 years, 47% were female and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 7. Complete 24-hour recanalization was more frequent with IVT than CTr (51% versus 9%; OR [95% CI]=10.62 [2.13-52.92]) and with EVT compared with BMT (68% versus 34%; OR [95% CI]=4.11 [1.35-12.53]). Higher proportions of good disability, visual and cognitive outcomes were observed in IVT versus CTr, <sub>adj</sub> ORs (95% CI)=1.65 (0.60-4.52), 2.01 (0.58-7.01), 2.94 (0.35-24.4), respectively, and in EVT versus BMT, <sub>adj</sub> ORs (95% CI)=1.44 (0.51-4.10), 4.28 (1.00-18.29), 4.37 (0.72-26.53), respectively. Hemorrhagic complications and mortality did not increase with IVT or EVT. Conclusion s-We show increased odds of recanalization following IVT and even higher after EVT. We observed a trend for a positive effect on disability, visual, and cognitive outcomes with IVT over CTr and with EVT over BMT

    Associated Factors and Long-Term Prognosis of 24-Hour Worsening of Arterial Patency After Ischemic Stroke.

    No full text
    Background and Purpose- Early arterial recanalization in acute ischemic stroke is strongly associated with better outcomes. However, early worsening of arterial patency was seldom studied. We investigated potential predictors and long-term prognosis of worsening of arterial patency at 24 hours after stroke onset. Methods- Patients from the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne registry including admission and 24-hour vascular imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography) were included. Worsening of arterial patency was defined as a new occlusion and significant stenosis in any extracranial or intracranial artery, comparing 24 hours with admission imaging. Variables associated with worsening of arterial patency were assessed by stepwise multiple logistic regression. The impact of arterial worsening on 3-month outcome was investigated with an adjusted modified Rankin Scale shift analysis. Results- Among 2152 included patients, 1387 (64.5%) received intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment, and 65 (3.0%) experienced 24-hour worsening of arterial patency. In multivariable analysis, history of hypertension seemed protective (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.27-0.75) while higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10), intracranial (aOR, 4.78; 95% CI, 2.03-11.25) and extracranial stenosis (aOR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.95-6.93), and good collaterals (aOR, 3.71; 95% CI, 1.54-8.95) were independent predictors of worsening of arterial patency. Its occurrence was associated with a major unfavorable shift in the distribution of the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months (aOR, 5.97; 95% CI, 3.64-9.79). Conclusions- Stroke severity and admission vascular imaging findings may help to identify patients at a higher risk of developing worsening of arterial patency at 24 hours. The impact of worsening of arterial patency on long-term outcome warrants better methods to detect and prevent this early complication

    Twenty-Four-Hour Reocclusion After Successful Mechanical Thrombectomy: Associated Factors and Long-Term Prognosis.

    No full text
    Background and Purpose- Early arterial recanalization is a strong determinant of prognosis in acute ischemic stroke. Nevertheless, reocclusion can occur after initial recanalization. We assessed associated factors and long-term prognosis of reocclusion after successful mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Methods- From the prospectively constructed Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne cohort, we included consecutive patients with anterior and posterior circulation strokes treated by successful MT (modified treatment in cerebral infarction 2b-3) and with 24-hour vascular imaging available. Reocclusion at this time-point was defined as new intracranial occlusion within an arterial segment recanalized at the end of MT. Through multivariate logistic regression, we investigated associated factors and 3-months outcome. In a 4:1 matched-cohort, we also assessed the role of residual thrombus or stenosis on post-recanalization angiographic images as potential predictor of reocclusion. Results- Among 473 patients with successful recanalization, 423 (89%) were included. Of these, 28 (6.6%) had 24-hour reocclusion. Preadmission statin therapy (aOR [adjusted odds ratio], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94), intracranial internal carotid artery occlusion (aOR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.50-8.32), number of passes (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06-1.62), transient reocclusion during MT (aOR, 8.55; 95% CI, 2.14-34.09), and atherosclerotic cause (aOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.34-7.37) were independently associated with reocclusion. In the matched-cohort analysis, residual thrombus or stenosis was associated with reocclusion (aOR, 15.6; 95% CI, 4.6-52.8). Patients experiencing reocclusion had worse outcome (aOR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.2-20.0). Conclusions- Reocclusion within 24-hours of successful MT was independently associated with statin pretreatment, occlusion site, more complex procedures, atherosclerotic cause, and residual thrombus or stenosis after recanalization. Reocclusion impact on long-term outcome highlights the need to monitor and prevent this early complication
    corecore