ANÁLISIS DE LA COMPLEJIDAD DE CUIDADOS PALIATIVOS QUE PRESENTAN LOS PACIENTES CON CÁNCER AVANZADO

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los cuidados paliativos tienen como objetivo mejorar la calidad de vida de pacientes con enfermedades crónicas terminales aliviando el sufrimiento de estos. El cáncer es una de las principales enfermedades, sobre todo en estadios avanzados, que amenazan la vida de los pacientes, lo que los propone como candidatos para el uso de los cuidados paliativos. Existen diferentes tipos de cuidados paliativos, los cuidados paliativos iniciales ofrecidos por los centros de atención primaria y los cuidados avanzados cubiertos por profesionales especializados. Es una tarea difícil identificar los pacientes que necesitan cuidados paliativos iniciales o avanzados, y habitualmente es una decisión que los profesionales sanitarios toman de forma subjetiva. En los últimos tiempos se han desarrollado modelos de atención basados en niveles de complejidad para ayudar a gestionar el tipo de cuidado individualizado que necesita cada paciente, y consecuentemente se han elaborado herramientas para evaluar la complejidad de los pacientes en cuidados paliativos, por ejemplo el “Instrumento diagnóstico de complejidad de cuidados paliativos” o IDC-Pal. Conociendo la complejidad que presentan los pacientes oncológicos en cuidados paliativos se podrían administrar de forma temprana e individualizada aquellos tratamientos e intervenciones terapéuticas necesarias para evitar sufrimientos innecesarios al paciente y su familia.OBJETIVO: El objetivo principal fue describir el grado de complejidad que presentan los pacientes oncológicos en cuidados paliativos ingresado en la planta de Oncología Médica del Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet de ZaragozaMETERIAL Y METODOS:Se realizó un estudio de tipo descriptivo, observacional y transversal, con 100 sujetos diagnosticados de una patología oncológica avanzada en tratamiento paliativo e ingresados en planta de Oncología Médica entre los meses de marzo y abril del 2023. Tras informar a los pacientes sobre el proyecto, se obtuvieron durante una entrevista datos sociodemográficos, clínicos, oncológicos y sociales para cumplimentar un cuestionario validado sobre la complejidad. RESULTADOS: La media de edad de los pacientes fue de 65.5 años, el 55% fueron mujeres y el 58% estaban casados. El tipo de tumor que más frecuentemente presentaban fue el cáncer de pulmón (31%), siendo la mayoría de ellos metastásicos (92%) en tratamiento oncológico activo (80%). Los síntomas más observados en los pacientes fueron la astenia (91%), la anorexia (55%), y el dolor (53%). El principal cuidador de los pacientes fueron sus parejas (41%), siendo la mayoría de ellos mujeres (58%). La mayoría de los pacientes presentaba una comorbilidad intermedia (7-10 puntos en la escala de Charlson), un estado funcional reducido (70-50% en la escasa PPS) y una estancia hospitalaria intermedia (10-20 días);Según el IDC-Pal, el 68% de los pacientes fueron clasificados como en situación de alta complejidad al presentar al menos un criterio de alta complejidad, el 26% de los pacientes se clasificaron como en situación de complejidad al no presentar ningún criterio de alta complejidad y al menos uno de complejidad, y solo el 6% de los pacientes se clasificaron como en situación de no complejidad al no presentar ningún criterio de alta complejidad ni de complejidad. DISCUSION:Los resultados de este proyecto son consistentes con los descritos en la bibliografía, destacándose una mayor proporción de pacientes con alta complejidad y complejidad (94%) en nuestra población de estudio. Esto puede deberse a que la muestra seleccionada para el estudio fueron pacientes hospitalizados en un hospital de tercer nivel, a diferencia de otros estudios en los que la muestra se obtuvo de pacientes en cuidados paliativos hospitalizados y en domicilio. Esto puede indicar una buena adecuación de los recursos sanitarios con respecto a la complejidad del paciente y al tipo de cuidados paliativos que necesita, o dicho de otra manera, basándonos en estos datos, tenemos razones para pensar que la indicación de hospitalización está bastante fundamentada en la mayoría de los pacientes.CONCLUSIÖN: En conclusión, este estudio ha demostrado que una alta proporción de pacientes oncológicos en cuidados paliativos hospitalizados presentan alta complejidad, lo que sugiere una buena adecuación de los recursos sanitarios con respecto a la complejidad del paciente.<br /

Oligomeric enteral nutrition in undernutrition, due to oncology treatment-related diarrhea. Systematic review and proposal of an algorithm of action

Oncology treatment-related diarrhea and malnutrition appear together in oncological patients because of the disease itself, or the treatments that are administered for it. Therefore it is essential to carry out a nutritional treatment. Enteral nutrition formulas, containing peptides and medium chain triglycerides, can facilitate absorption in cases of malabsorption. There are few references to the use of enteral nutrition in the clinical society guidelines of patient management with oncology treatment-related diarrhea (OTRD). A bibliographic review of the studies with oligomeric enteral nutrition in OTRD found only nine studies with chemotherapy (all with the same oligomeric formula in which oral mucositis improves, while the rest of the outcomes show different results), and eight studies with radiotherapy (with different products and very heterogeneous results). We hereby present our action algorithm to supplement the diet of OTRD patients with an oligomeric enteral nutrition formula. The first step is the nutritional assessment, followed by the assessment of the functional capacity of the patient’s intestine. With these two aspects evaluated, the therapeutic possibilities available vary in degrees of complexity: These will range from the usual dietary recommendations, to supplementation with oral oligomeric enteral nutrition, along with complete enteral nutrition with oligomeric formula, and up to potentially total parenteral nutrition

REGISTRI: Regorafenib in first-line of KIT/PDGFRA wild type metastatic GIST: a collaborative Spanish (GEIS), Italian (ISG) and French Sarcoma Group (FSG) phase II trial

Wild type GIST; Biomarker; Clinical trialGIST de tipo salvaje; Biomarcador; Ensayo clínicoGIST de tipus salvatge, Biomarcador; Assaig clínicBackground Approximately 15% of adult GIST patients harbor tumors that are wild-type for KIT and PDGFRα genes (KP-wtGIST). These tumors usually have SDH deficiencies, exhibit a more indolent behavior and are resistant to imatinib. Underlying oncogenic mechanisms in KP-wtGIST include overexpression of HIF1α high IGFR signaling through the MAPK pathway or BRAF activating mutation, among others. As regorafenib inhibits these signaling pathways, it was hypothesized that it could be more active as upfront therapy in advanced KP-wtGIST. Methods Adult patients with advanced KP-wtGIST after central confirmation by NGS, naïve of systemic treatment for advanced disease, were included in this international phase II trial. Eligible patients received regorafenib 160 mg per day for 21 days every 28 days. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), according to RECIST 1.1 at 12 weeks by central radiological assessment. Results From May 2016 to October 2020, 30 patients were identified as KP-wtGIST by Sanger sequencing and 16 were confirmed by central molecular screening with NGS. Finally, 15 were enrolled and received regorafenib. The study was prematurely closed due to the low accrual worsened by COVID outbreak. The DCR at 12 weeks was 86.7% by central assessment. A subset of 60% experienced some tumor shrinkage, with partial responses and stabilization observed in 13% and 87% respectively, by central assessment. SDH-deficient GIST showed better clinical outcome than other KP-wtGIST. Conclusions Regorafenib activity in KP-wtGIST compares favorably with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, especially in the SDH-deficient GIST subset and it should be taken into consideration as upfront therapy of advanced KP-wtGIST.GEIS, Bayer and SELNET. SELNET has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement Nº. 825806

Gene expression analyses determine two different subpopulations in KIT-negative GIST-like (KNGL) patients

Introduction: there are limited findings available on KIT-negative GIST-like (KNGL) population. Also, KIT expression may be post-transcriptionally regulated by miRNA221 and miRNA222. Hence, the aim of this study is to characterize KNGL population, by differential gene expression, and to analyze miRNA221/222 expression and their prognostic value in KNGL patients. Methods: KIT, PDGFRA, DOG1, IGF1R, MIR221 and MIR222 expression levels were determined by qRT-PCR. We also analyzed KIT and PDGFRA mutations, DOG1 expression, by immunohistochemistry, along with clinical and pathological data. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) differences were calculated using Log-rank test. Results: hierarchical cluster analyses from gene expression data identified two groups: group I had KIT, DOG1 and PDGFRA overexpression and IGF1R underexpression and group II had overexpression of IGF1R and low expression of KIT, DOG1 and PDGFRA. Group II had a significant worse OS (p = 0.013) in all the series, and showed a tendency for worse OS (p = 0.11), when analyzed only the localized cases. MiRNA222 expression was significantly lower in a control subset of KIT-positive GIST (p < 0.001). OS was significantly worse in KNGL cases with higher expression of MIR221 (p = 0.028) or MIR222 (p = 0.014). Conclusions: we identified two distinct KNGL subsets, with a different prognostic value. Increased levels of miRNA221/222, which are associated with worse OS, could explain the absence of KIT protein expression of most KNGL tumors

Cediranib in patients with alveolar soft-part sarcoma (CASPS):a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial

Background Alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma that is unresponsive to chemotherapy. Cediranib, a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, has shown substantial activity in ASPS in non-randomised studies. The Cediranib in Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma (CASPS) study was designed to discriminate the effect of cediranib from the intrinsically indolent nature of ASPS.Methods In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial, we recruited participants from 12 hospitals in the UK (n=7), Spain (n=3), and Australia (n=2). Patients were eligible if they were aged 16 years or older; metastatic ASPS that had progressed in the previous 6 months; had an ECOG performance status of 0-1; life expectancy of more than 12 weeks; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. Participants had to have no anti-cancer treatment within 4 weeks before trial entry, with exception of palliative radiotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1), with allocation by use of computer-generated random permuted blocks of six, to either cediranib (30 mg orally, once daily) or matching placebo tablets for 24 weeks. Treatment was supplied in number-coded bottles, masking participants and clinicians to assignment. Participants were unblinded at week 24 or sooner if they had progression defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1); those on placebo crossed over to cediranib and all participants continued on treatment until progression or death. The primary endpoint was percentage change in sum of target marker lesion diameters between baseline and week 24 or progression if sooner, assessed in the evaluable population (all randomly assigned participants who had a scan at week 24 [or sooner if they progressed] with target marker lesions measured). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01337401; the European Clinical Trials database, number EudraCT2010-021163-33; and the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN63733470 recruitment is complete and follow-up is ongoing.Findings Between July 15, 2011, and July 29, 2016, of 48 participants recruited, all were randomly assigned to cediranib (n=32) or placebo (n=16). 23 (48%) were female and the median age was 31 years (IQR 27-45). Median follow-up was 34·3 months (IQR 23·7-55·6) at the time of data cutoff for these analyses (April 11, 2018). Four participants in the cediranib group were not evaluable for the primary endpoint (one did not start treatment, and three did not have their scan at 24 weeks). Median percentage change in sum of target marker lesion diameters for the evaluable population was -8·3% (IQR -26·5 to 5·9) with cediranib versus 13·4% (IQR 1·1 to 21·3) with placebo (one-sided p=0·0010). The most common grade 3 adverse events on (blinded) cediranib were hypertension (six [19%] of 31) and diarrhoea (two [6%]). 15 serious adverse reactions in 12 patients were reported; 12 of these reactions occurred on open-label cediranib, and the most common symptoms were dehydration (n=2), vomiting (n=2), and proteinuria (n=2). One probable treatment-related death (intracranial haemorrhage) occurred 41 days after starting open-label cediranib in a patient who was assigned to placebo in the masked phase.Interpretation Given the high incidence of metastatic disease and poor long-term prognosis of ASPS, together with the lack of efficacy of conventional chemotherapy, our finding of significant clinical activity with cediranib in this disease is an important step towards the goal of long-term disease control for these young patients. Future clinical trials in ASPS are also likely to involve immune checkpoint inhibitors.Funding Cancer Research UK and AstraZeneca

TTCC-2019-02: real-world evidence of first-line cetuximab plus paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of the ERBITAX scheme (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose, and then 250 mg/m2 weekly) as first-line treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who are medically unfit for cisplatin-based (PT) chemotherapy.Materials and methodsThis retrospective, non-interventional study involved 16 centers in Spain. Inclusion criteria were to have started receiving ERBITAX regimen from January 2012 to December 2018; histologically confirmed SCCHN including oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx; age ≥18 years; and platinum (PT) chemotherapy ineligibility due to performance status, comorbidities, high accumulated dose of PT, or PT refractoriness.ResultsA total of 531 patients from 16 hospitals in Spain were enrolled. The median age was 66 years, 82.7% were male, and 83.5% were current/former smokers. Patients were ineligible to receive PT due to ECOG 2 (50.3%), comorbidities (32%), PT cumulative dose ≥ 225 mg/m2 (10.5%), or PT refractoriness (7.2%). Response rate was 37.7%. Median duration of response was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4–6.6). With a median follow-up of 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.7–10.2), median PFS and OS were 4.5 months (95% CI: 3.9–5.0) and 8.9 months (95% CI: 7.8–10.3), respectively. Patients treated with immunotherapy after ERBITAX had better OS with a median of 29.8 months compared to 13.8 months for those who received other treatments. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were acne-like rash in 36 patients (6.8%) and oral mucositis in 8 patients (1.5%). Five (0.9%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia.ConclusionThis study confirms the real-world efficacy and tolerability of ERBITAX as first-line treatment in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN when PT is not feasible. Immunotherapy after treatment with ERBITAX showed remarkable promising survival, despite potential selection bias

Impact of an Oral Nutritional Protocol with Oligomeric Enteral Nutrition on the Quality of Life of Patients with Oncology Treatment-Related Diarrhea

(1) Background: Nutritional status can influence the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. (2) Methods: This subanalysis evaluated the impact of an oral oligomeric enteral nutrition (OEN) protocol on the QoL of patients with oncology treatment-related diarrhea (OTRD) in a multicenter, observational, prospective study (DIAPOENO study). QoL was assessed with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) at baseline and after eight weeks of OEN treatment. (3) In the overall population, all the NHP categories significantly improved after eight weeks of OEN treatment: energy levels (p &lt; 0.001), pain (p &lt; 0.001), emotional reactions (p &lt; 0.001), sleep (p &lt; 0.001), social isolation (p = 0.023), and physical abilities (p = 0.001). QoL improvement was higher in patients with improved or maintained nutritional status and in those with improved consistency of stools with the OEN protocol. However, QoL did not significantly improve in patients with worse nutritional status and with worse or maintained stool consistency with the OEN protocol. QoL improved regardless of disease severity. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that weight change was significantly associated with improved QoL (OR 2.90–5.3), except for social isolation, in models unadjusted and adjusted to age, sex, oncology treatment, and stool consistency. (4) Conclusion: In this subanalysis, the OEN protocol was associated with improved QoL

Nilotinib as Coadjuvant Treatment with Doxorubicin in Patients with Sarcomas: A Phase I Trial of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcoma.

Purpose: Nilotinib plus doxorubicin showed to be synergistic regarding apoptosis in several sarcoma cell lines. A phase I/II trial was thus designed to explore the feasibility of nilotinib as coadjuvant of doxorubicin by inhibiting MRP-1/P-gp efflux activity. The phase I part of the study is presented here.Patients and Methods: Nilotinib 400 mg/12 hours was administered in fixed dose from day 1 to 6, and doxorubicin on day 5 of each cycle. Three dose escalation levels for doxorubicin at 60, 65, and 75 mg/m2 were planned. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a total of 4 cycles. Eligible subtypes were retroperitoneal liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and unresectable/metastatic high-grade chondrosarcoma.Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled: 7 chondrosarcoma, 4 liposarcoma, and 2 leiomyosarcoma. In 46 cycles administered, the most relevant grade 3/4 adverse effects per patient were neutropenia 54%, febrile neutropenia 15%, and asthenia 8%. No cardiac toxicity was observed. Only one dose-limiting toxicity (febrile neutropenia) was reported in the third dose level. With regard to efficacy, 1 partial response (1 liposarcoma), 9 stable diseases (5 chondrosarcoma, 2 liposarcoma, 1 leiomyosarcoma), and 3 progressive diseases (2 chondrosarcoma and 1 leiomyosarcoma) were present. ABCB1 and ABCC1 RNA expression levels decreased by 58.47-fold and 1.47-fold, respectively, on day 5 of the cycle.Conclusions: Combination of MRP-1/P-gp inhibitor, nilotinib, as coadjuvant with doxorubicin is feasible; it appears not to add substantial toxicity compared with doxorubicin alone. Pharmacodynamic study supports this concept. The recommended dose for the phase II part for doxorubicin was 75 mg/m2Clin Cancer Res; 24(21); 5239-49. ©2018 AACR