Hyperthermia dose-effect relationship in 420 patients with cervical cancer treated with combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia

Adding hyperthermia to standard radiotherapy (RT + HT) improves treatment outcome for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). We investigated the effect of hyperthermia dose on treatment outcome for patients with LACC treated with RT + HT. We collected treatment and outcome data of 420 patients with LACC treated with hyperthermia at our institute from 1990 to 2005. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on response rate, local control, disease-specific survival and toxicity for these patients to search for a thermal dose response relationship. Besides commonly identified prognostic factors in LACC like tumour stage, performance status, radiotherapy dose and tumour size, thermal parameters involving both temperature and duration of heating emerged as significant predictors of the various end-points. The more commonly used CEM43T90 (cumulative equivalent minutes of T90 above 43 degrees C) was less influential than TRISE (based on the average T50 increase and the duration of heating, normalised to the scheduled duration of treatment). CEM43T90 and TRISE measured intraluminally correlate significantly and independently with tumour control and survival. These findings stimulate further technological development and improvement of deep hyperthermia, as they strongly suggest that it might be worthwhile to increase the thermal dose for LACC, either by treatment optimisation or by prolonging the treatment time. These results also confirm the beneficial effects from hyperthermia as demonstrated in our earlier randomised trial, and justify applying radiotherapy and hyperthermia as treatment of choice for patients with advanced cervical cancer. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Optimizing deep hyperthermia treatments: are locations of patient pain complaints correlated with modelled SAR peak locations?

During deep hyperthermia treatment, patient pain complaints due to heating are common when maximizing power. Hence, there exists a good rationale to investigate whether the locations of predicted SAR peaks by hyperthermia treatment planning (HTP) are correlated with the locations of patient pain during treatment. A retrospective analysis was performed, using the treatment reports of 35 patients treated with deep hyperthermia controlled by extensive treatment planning. For various SAR indicators, the average distance from a SAR peak to a patient discomfort location was calculated, for each complaint. The investigated V(0.1 closest) (i.e. the part of the 0.1th SAR percentile closest to the patient complaint) performed the best, and leads to an average distance between the SAR peak and the complaint location of 3.9 cm. Other SAR indicators produced average distances that were all above 10 cm. Further, the predicted SAR peak location with V0.1 provides a 77% match with the region of complaint. The current study demonstrates that HTP is able to provide a global indication of the regions where hotspots during treatment will most likely occur. Further development of this technology is necessary in order to use HTP as a valuable toll for objective and advanced SAR steering. The latter is especially valid for applications that enable 3D SAR steering

Patient positioning in deep hyperthermia: influences of inaccuracies, signal correction possibilities and optimization potential

In this deep hyperthermia study, the robustness of SAR(specific absorption rate) patterns to patient-position variations is assessed, as well as the possibilities to correct for improper positioning and the benefits of non-standard positions. With a finite element model, the SAR distributions were predicted for ten patients at 33 positions. Position sensitivity is assessed for both SAR-focus steering, i.e. settings based on a calculated focus in a cylindrical patient representation, and HTP (hyperthermia treatment planning)-guided steering, i.e. model-based optimization of the SAR distribution. Position inaccuracies of less than 1 cmdo not significantly affect SAR patterns. For SAR-focus steering, the SAR maximum is not always at the desired focus location, especially in the Y (anterior/posterior)- and Z (axial)- directions. For a maximum shift of 5 cm in all directions, both SAR-focus steering and HTP-guided steering are suitable to correct for improper positioning up to the level that none of the investigated positions appears preferable. Current positioning precision is sufficient in the X (right-left)-direction, but precision measurements are needed to reach the desired accuracy in the Y-direction. In the Z-direction, a cranial shift of the applicator is predicted to be beneficial. If the position is known accurately, correction of the treatment setting is possible without loss of heating efficiency. Additionally, no preferable positions exist

Complaint-adaptive power density optimization as a tool for HTP-guided steering in deep hyperthermia treatment of pelvic tumors

For an efficient clinical use of HTP (hyperthermia treatment planning), optimization methods are needed. In this study, a complaint-adaptive PD (power density) optimization as a tool for HTP-guided steering in deep hyperthermia of pelvic tumors is developed and tested. PD distribution in patients is predicted using FE-models. Two goal functions, Opt1 and Opt2, are applied to optimize PD distributions. Optimization consists of three steps: initial optimization, adaptive optimization after a first complaint and increasing the weight of a region after recurring complaints. Opt1 initially considers only target PD whereas Opt2 also takes into account hot spots. After patient complaints though, both limit PD in a region. Opt1 and Opt2 are evaluated in a phantom test, using patient models and during hyperthermia treatment. The phantom test and a sensitivity study in ten patient models, show that HTP-guided steering is most effective in peripheral complaint regions. Clinical evaluation in two groups of five patients shows that time between complaints is longer using Opt2 (p = 0.007). However, this does not lead to significantly different temperatures (T50s of 40.3 (Opt1) versus 40.1. degrees C (Opt2) (p=0.898)). HTP-guided steering is feasible in terms of PD reduction in complaint regions and in time consumption. Opt2 is preferable in future use, because of better complaint reduction and control

Patient positioning in deep hyperthermia:influences of inaccuracies, signal correction possibilities and optimization potential

\u3cp\u3eIn this deep hyperthermia study, the robustness of SAR (specific absorption rate) patterns to patient-position variations is assessed, as well as the possibilities to correct for improper positioning and the benefits of non-standard positions. With a finite element model, the SAR distributions were predicted for ten patients at 33 positions. Position sensitivity is assessed for both SAR-focus steering, i.e. settings based on a calculated focus in a cylindrical patient representation, and HTP (hyperthermia treatment planning)-guided steering, i.e. model-based optimization of the SAR distribution. Position inaccuracies of less than 1 cm do not significantly affect SAR patterns. For SAR-focus steering, the SAR maximum is not always at the desired focus location, especially in the Y (anterior/posterior)- and Z (axial)-directions. For a maximum shift of 5 cm in all directions, both SAR-focus steering and HTP-guided steering are suitable to correct for improper positioning up to the level that none of the investigated positions appears preferable. Current positioning precision is sufficient in the X (right-left)-direction, but precision measurements are needed to reach the desired accuracy in the Y-direction. In the Z-direction, a cranial shift of the applicator is predicted to be beneficial. If the position is known accurately, correction of the treatment setting is possible without loss of heating efficiency. Additionally, no preferable positions exist.\u3c/p\u3

Benefit of replacing the Sigma-60 by the Sigma-Eye applicator : a Monte Carlo-based uncertainty analysis

\u3cp\u3eBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical benefit of replacing the BSD-2000 Sigma-60 with the Sigma-Eye applicator, taking into account effects of uncertainties in tissue and water bolus parameters.\u3c/p\u3e\u3cp\u3ePATIENTS AND METHODS: For 20 patients, specific absorption rate (SAR) and temperature distributions were calculated and optimized, based on computed tomography (CT) scans in treatment position. The impact of uncertainties on predicted distributions was studied using a Monte Carlo uncertainty assessment.\u3c/p\u3e\u3cp\u3eRESULTS: Replacing the Sigma-60 by the Sigma-Eye applicator resulted in a higher SAR in the tumor [on average a decrease of the hotspot tumor quotient (HTQ) by 24%; p < 0.001], and higher temperatures (T90: +0.4°C, p < 0.001; T50: +0.6°C, p < 0.001) using literature values and SAR optimization. When temperature optimization (T90) was used, a larger average increase was found (T90: +0.7°C, p < 0.001; T50: +0.8°C, p < 0.001). When taking into account uncertainties, a decrease of 23% in median HTQ (p < 0.001) and an increase in T50 and T90 of 0.4°C (p < 0.001) could be demonstrated.\u3c/p\u3e\u3cp\u3eCONCLUSION: Based on this uncertainty analysis, significant and clinically relevant improvements in HTQ and tumor temperature were achieved when replacing the Sigma-60 by the Sigma-Eye applicator.\u3c/p\u3