Identifying the key components of a complex intervention for a systematic review.

<p>Identifying the key components of a complex intervention for a systematic review.</p

Summary of recommendations.

<p>Summary of recommendations.</p

Current guidance for reporting complex interventions and where further research is required.

<p>Current guidance for reporting complex interventions and where further research is required.</p

Details of falls, dizziness and blackouts questionnaires.

<p>Details of falls, dizziness and blackouts questionnaires.</p

Number of falls reported in the previous 12 months, by gender¹.

<p>Figure footnote: ¹Reported as percentage of those who have fallen.</p

Venn diagram showing the overlap between falls, dizziness and blackouts, % (n)².

<p>Figure footnote: ²Reported for n = 793 with no missing data in any category.</p

Falls: number, duration of history, sub-types, psychological impact and impact on health and social care services - reported for those who had fallen in the previous 12 months, by type of residence.

*<p>Odds ratio calculated only where Chi-square p-value <0.05. CI- confidence interval.</p>†<p>Kruskal-Wallis test for no difference by housing status.</p>‡<p>Denominator is the number of participants reporting fall in previous 12 months with valid data; denominators vary due to missing values.</p>§<p>Chi-square test for no difference by housing status.</p

Health service use and 12 month cost of falls.

*<p>Sources: Curtis LA (2007) Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2007. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK and Newton JL, Kyle P, Liversidge P, Robinson G, Wilton K, et al. (2006) The costs of falls in the community to the North East Ambulance Service. Emerg Med J 23: 479–481.</p>†<p>Rounded to nearest pound sterling. Conversion rates (Aug 2011): £1 = US$1.63, £1 = €1.13.</p>‡<p>Includes the estimated cost of emergency ambulance use estimated from the average cost of a fall to the regional ambulance service in 2004 (Newton et al. 2006) adjusted for inflation (5% per annum). Lower and upper quartile estimated on basis of Accident and Emergency quartiles (0.86–1.14).</p>§<p>Service use in previous 12 months due to fall.</p>¶<p>Service use ‘ever’ due to fall.</p>#<p>Lower and upper quartile not available.</p

Percentage of clinicians responding to components of their routine advice about weight management, self management and general education.

#<p>Correlation is with proportion of people responding and BMI>30.</p>##<p>Question stem “If pressed for time which ONE would you do?”; figure is % endorsing that response.</p>**<p>p<0.01.</p

Practice mean (SD) values for patients’ reported levels of confidence that they can deal with elements of diabetes care.

#<p>comparison of those scoring “confident” or “very confident” for patients who have had diabetes less than two years versus those who have had diabetes more than two years.</p