Final Path Analysis Model.

<p>Model 3 was the best representation of the observed relationship between variables and examined the complex associations between Body Mass Index (BMI), neuroimaging results and behavioral data. BIS-11 = Barratt Impulsiveness Scale; Standardized regression weights for direct effects are shown *p<0.05 **p<0.001.</p

In-Scanner Negative Emotion Intensity Ratings.

<p>Mean (95% Confidence Interval) in-scanner negative emotion ratings elicited during each condition (Observe, Maintain and Regulate) (n = 28) *p<0.05.</p

fMRI task.

<p>Example images for Observe, Maintain and Regulate conditions.</p

Sample characteristics and behavioral measure results.

<p>Sample characteristics and behavioral measure results.</p

PPI Results.

<p>PPI Results.</p

In-scanner Negative Emotion Ratings.

<p>In-scanner Negative Emotion Ratings.</p

Neuroimaging Results.

<p>Between-group differences during negative emotion maintenance (Maintain/Observe) in normal-weight versus excess-weight participants. An emotion generation mask (a) and a mask consisting of combined one-sample results (b) were used. Between-group differences during negative emotion reappraisal (Regulate/Maintain) in excess-weight versus normal-weight participants (c). An emotion generation mask consisting of the amygdala and insula was used.</p