20 research outputs found

    L1 Antisense Promoter Drives Tissue-Specific Transcription of Human Genes

    Get PDF
    Transcription of transposable elements interspersed in the genome is controlled by complex interactions between their regulatory elements and host factors. However, the same regulatory elements may be occasionally used for the transcription of host genes. One such example is the human L1 retrotransposon, which contains an antisense promoter (ASP) driving transcription into adjacent genes yielding chimeric transcripts. We have characterized 49 chimeric mRNAs corresponding to sense and antisense strands of human genes. Here we show that L1 ASP is capable of functioning as an alternative promoter, giving rise to a chimeric transcript whose coding region is identical to the ORF of mRNA of the following genes: KIAA1797, CLCN5, and SLCO1A2. Furthermore, in these cases the activity of L1 ASP is tissue-specific and may expand the expression pattern of the respective gene. The activity of L1 ASP is tissue-specific also in cases where L1 ASP produces antisense RNAs complementary to COL11A1 and BOLL mRNAs. Simultaneous assessment of the activity of L1 ASPs in multiple loci revealed the presence of L1 ASP-derived transcripts in all human tissues examined. We also demonstrate that L1 ASP can act as a promoter in vivo and predict that it has a heterogeneous transcription initiation site. Our data suggest that L1 ASP-driven transcription may increase the transcriptional flexibility of several human genes

    Combination of native and denaturing PAGE for the detection of protein binding regions in long fragments of genomic DNA

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In a traditional electrophoresis mobility shift assay (EMSA) a <sup>32</sup>P-labeled double-stranded DNA oligonucleotide or a restriction fragment bound to a protein is separated from the unbound DNA by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) in nondenaturing conditions. An extension of this method uses the large population of fragments derived from long genomic regions (approximately 600 kb) for the identification of fragments containing protein binding regions. With this method, genomic DNA is fragmented by restriction enzymes, fragments are amplified by PCR, radiolabeled, incubated with nuclear proteins and the resulting DNA-protein complexes are separated by two-dimensional PAGE. Shifted DNA fragments containing protein binding sites are identified by using additional procedures, i. e. gel elution, PCR amplification, cloning and sequencing. Although the method allows simultaneous analysis of a large population of fragments, it is relatively laborious and can be used to detect only high affinity protein binding sites. Here we propose an alternative and straightforward strategy which is based on a combination of native and denaturing PAGE. This strategy allows the identification of DNA fragments containing low as well as high affinity protein binding regions, derived from genomic DNA (<10 kb) of known sequence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We have combined an EMSA-based selection step with subsequent denaturing PAGE for the localization of protein binding regions in long (up to10 kb) fragments of genomic DNA. Our strategy consists of the following steps: digestion of genomic DNA with a 4-cutter restriction enzyme (<it>Alu</it>I, <it>Bsu</it>RI, <it>Tru</it>I, etc), separation of low and high molecular weight fractions of resultant DNA fragments, <sup>32</sup>P-labeling with Klenow polymerase, traditional EMSA, gel elution and identification of the shifted bands (or smear) by denaturing PAGE. The identification of DNA fragments containing protein binding sites is carried out by running the gel-eluted fragments alongside with the full "spectrum" of initial restriction fragments of known size. Here the strategy is used for the identification of protein-binding regions in the 5' region of the rat p75 neurotrophin receptor (<it>p75NTR</it>) gene.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The developed strategy is based on a combination of traditional EMSA and denaturing PAGE for the identification of protein binding regions in long fragments of genomic DNA. The identification is straightforward and can be applied to shifted bands corresponding to stable DNA-protein complexes as well as unstable complexes, which undergo dissociation during electrophoresis.</p

    A potential role of alternative splicing in the regulation of the transcriptional activity of human GLI2 in gonadal tissues

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Mammalian Gli proteins are important transcription factors involved in the regulation of Sonic hedgehog signal transduction pathway. Association of Gli2 with mammalian development and human disease led us to study the structure and expression of the human GLI2. RESULTS: We show that the region encoding GLI2 repressor domain is subject to alternative splicing in the gonadal tissues and different cell lines. Two major alternatively spliced forms of GLI2 mRNA arise from skipping exon 3 (GLI2Δ3) or exons 4 and 5 (GLI2Δ4–5). Both forms contain premature translational stop codons in the GLI2 open reading frame (ORF) starting from exon 2. Translation of GLI2Δ3 and GLI2Δ4–5 in vitro, initiated from downstream AUG codons, produced N-terminally truncated proteins. In Gli-dependent transactivation assay, expression of GLI2Δ3 induced activation of the reporter gene similar to that of the full-length construct (GLI2fl) containing complete ORF. However, expression of the GLI2Δ4–5 resulted in about 10-fold increase in activation, suggesting that deletion of the major part of repressor domain was responsible for the enhanced activation of GLI2 protein. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that in addition to proteolytic processing, alternative splicing may be another important regulatory mechanism for the modulation of repressor and activator properties of GLI2 protein

    Intronic L1 Retrotransposons and Nested Genes Cause Transcriptional Interference by Inducing Intron Retention, Exonization and Cryptic Polyadenylation

    Get PDF
    Transcriptional interference has been recently recognized as an unexpectedly complex and mostly negative regulation of genes. Despite a relatively few studies that emerged in recent years, it has been demonstrated that a readthrough transcription derived from one gene can influence the transcription of another overlapping or nested gene. However, the molecular effects resulting from this interaction are largely unknown.Using in silico chromosome walking, we searched for prematurely terminated transcripts bearing signatures of intron retention or exonization of intronic sequence at their 3' ends upstream to human L1 retrotransposons, protein-coding and noncoding nested genes. We demonstrate that transcriptional interference induced by intronic L1s (or other repeated DNAs) and nested genes could be characterized by intron retention, forced exonization and cryptic polyadenylation. These molecular effects were revealed from the analysis of endogenous transcripts derived from different cell lines and tissues and confirmed by the expression of three minigenes in cell culture. While intron retention and exonization were comparably observed in introns upstream to L1s, forced exonization was preferentially detected in nested genes. Transcriptional interference induced by L1 or nested genes was dependent on the presence or absence of cryptic splice sites, affected the inclusion or exclusion of the upstream exon and the use of cryptic polyadenylation signals.Our results suggest that transcriptional interference induced by intronic L1s and nested genes could influence the transcription of the large number of genes in normal as well as in tumor tissues. Therefore, this type of interference could have a major impact on the regulation of the host gene expression

    A 9,372 bp BamHI fragment derived from 5' region of (positions from -9,645 to -274) cloned in pBS KS (sequence with lower case letters) was digested with RI and I

    No full text
    Sequence derived from UCSC Genome Browser on Rat Nov. 2004 Assembly (contigs AABR03076992.1 and AABR03076383.1). Protein binding was detected for fragments marked with green (BsuRI digest) and yellow highlight or underlined (AluI digest). Fragments marked with grey highlight were derived from pBS KS+. <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Combination of native and denaturing PAGE for the detection of protein binding regions in long fragments of genomic DNA"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/272</p><p>BMC Genomics 2008;9():272-272.</p><p>Published online 4 Jun 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2435560.</p><p></p

    (A) L and H molecular fractions of corresponding RI and I fragments were incubated with (lane ) and without (lane -) PC12 nuclear extract (NE) and analysed by EMSA

    No full text
    Direct phosphoimaging of the wet 1 mm-thick gel is shown. (B) Denaturing PAGE of the shifted fragments. Lanes - and + show the pool of fragments used in EMSA and shifted bands (smear), respectively. Connecting lines indicate the bands or smear analyzed on two different gels. M, P-labeled 100 bp ladder (Gibco-BRL).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Combination of native and denaturing PAGE for the detection of protein binding regions in long fragments of genomic DNA"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/272</p><p>BMC Genomics 2008;9():272-272.</p><p>Published online 4 Jun 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2435560.</p><p></p

    A poly (dI-dC) concentration range from 100 to 800 μg/ml was tested with 2-fold differences

    No full text
    At each concentration, the incubation of labeled restriction fragment with PC12 nuclear extract (NE) was performed using two different poly (dI-dC) preparations with the average sizes 250 and 500 bp. C, a 202 bp II-I fragment and C, a 384 bp I-I fragment derived from -1.8 kb and -1.6 kb regions of the rat promoter, respectively. Arrowheads point at the major specific DNA-protein complexes. M, P-labeled 100 bp ladder (Gibco-BRL).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Combination of native and denaturing PAGE for the detection of protein binding regions in long fragments of genomic DNA"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/272</p><p>BMC Genomics 2008;9():272-272.</p><p>Published online 4 Jun 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2435560.</p><p></p

    A strategy for the detection of protein binding regions in genomic DNA fragments

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Combination of native and denaturing PAGE for the detection of protein binding regions in long fragments of genomic DNA"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/272</p><p>BMC Genomics 2008;9():272-272.</p><p>Published online 4 Jun 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2435560.</p><p></p
    corecore