7 research outputs found

    Бвязь ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² БОМВ, DRD2/ANKK1, MTHFR, MIR137, DNMT3B с клиничСскими проявлСниями ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π² остром ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΈ Π² состоянии рСмиссии

    Get PDF
    Updated view of genetic features of schizophrenia based on rare SNPs/CNVs with a huge influence on a disease and common SNPs with a small effect of each allele is presented. Altogether these genetic factors are acting to create neuropathophysiological disturbances observed in schizophrenia. Association of five polymorphisms MIR137 rs1625579,Β DRD2/ANKK1 rs1800497, MTHFR rs1801133, DNMT3B rs2424913, БОМВ rs4680 with the risk of schizophrenia in the Belarusian population, the level of symptoms of schizophrenia patients assessed by PANSS in the acute stage and remission, cognitive impairments, and treatment trajectory of schizophrenia patients during antipsychotic treatment were analyzed. The A/A-genotype of БОМВ rs4680 (Ρ€ = 0.008) and the Π‘/Π‘-genotype of MTHFR rs1801133 (Ρ€ = 0.02) are associated with the risk of schizophrenia among Belarusians. The T-allele of MTHFR rs1801133 is a risk factor of positive symptoms (Ρ€ = 0.02). Combining the C/C-genotype (DNMT3B rs2424913) and the G-allele (COMT rs4680) is associated with a significant difference in negative symptoms level between men and women. The polymorphism of БОМВ rs4680 (Ρ€ < 0.05) and the combination of БОМВ rs4680 + DRD2/ANKK1 rs1800497 (Ρ€ = 0.005) as well as MTHFR rs1801133 + DNMT3B rs2424913 (Ρ€ = 0.006) are related to the cognitive parameters measured by the WCST and Stroop test respectively. Schizophrenia patients who are the G-allele carriers of MIR137 rs1625579 demonstrated a more favorable negative symptom trajectory in comparison to Π’/Π’homozygotes (F = 2.2, p = 0.03). The trajectory of negative symptoms (F = 2.2, p = 0.03) and general psychopathological symptoms (F = 4.3, p = 0.0001) is different between men and women under antipsychotic treatment. These differences are associated with a minor amount of alleles of MIR137 rs1625579, DRD2/ANKK1 rs1800497, MTHFR rs1801133 polymorphic sites.По соврСмСнным прСдставлСниям, ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚, ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΉ ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, являСтся, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ, носитСлСм ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΊΠΈΡ… Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ с высоким эффСктом ΠΈ ряда распространСнных Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ с ΠΌΠ°Π»Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ эффСктами. БовмСстноС дСйствиС гСнСтичСских Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² рСализуСтся ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ нСйробиологичСскими путями, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡŽΡ‚ спСктр нСйрофизиологичСских Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°Π΅ΠΌΡ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ. Π’ Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ исслСдования Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° связь ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„Π½Ρ‹Ρ… сайтов MIR137 rs1625579, DRD2/ANKK1 rs1800497, MTHFR rs1801133, DNMT3B rs2424913, БОМВ rs4680 с риском возникновСния ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ срСди бСлорусов, ΡΡ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡŽ выраТСнности симптомов ΠΏΠΎ шкалС PANSS Π² остром ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΈ Π² Ρ„Π°Π·Π΅ рСмиссии, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ измСнСния симптоматичСской ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ антипсихотиками. Богласно ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ, Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏ A/AБОМВ rs4680 (Ρ€ = 0,008) ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏ Π‘/Π‘ MTHFR rs1801133 (Ρ€ = 0,02) ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ риска развития ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ срСди ΠΌΡƒΠΆΡ‡ΠΈΠ½ бСлорусской популяции. ВыявлСны мноТСствСнныС связи исслСдуСмых локусов с Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ симптомов ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ. T-аллСль MTHFR rs1801133 связан с риском формирования психотичСских симптомов (Ρ€ = 0,02). Π‘ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° C/C (DNMT3B rs2424913) ΠΈ G-аллСля (COMT rs4680) связано со Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΌΠΈ различиями Π² ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ Π½Π΅Π³Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… симптомов ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ муТского ΠΈ ТСнского ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π° (p = 0,00009). НаиболСС Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° связь локуса БОМВ rs4680 (Ρ€ < 0,05) ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ локусов БОМВ rs4680 + DRD2/ANKK1 rs1800497 (Ρ€ = 0,005) с ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ (ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎ Висконсинскому тСсту сортировки ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΊ – Π’Π’Π‘Πš), Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ локусов MTHFR rs1801133 + DNMT3B rs24 24913 (Ρ€ = 0,006) с ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌ тСста Π‘Ρ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠ°. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ с G-Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΌ MIR137 rs1625579 Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡΡ‚Π½ΡƒΡŽ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡƒ измСнСния Π½Π΅Π³Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ симптоматики (F = 2,2, p = 0,03) Π² сравнСнии с Π’/Π’Π³ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΡ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ. ΠžΠ±Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‹ достовСрныС различия Π² Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ измСнСния Π½Π΅Π³Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ (F = 2,2, p = 0,03) ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅ΠΉ психопатологичСской симптоматики (F = 4,3, p = 0,0001) Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ муТского ΠΈ ТСнского ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π° Π² зависимости ΠΎΡ‚ количСства ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ исслСдуСмым ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ

    Signal from Noise: Using Machine Learning to Distil Knowledge from Data in Biological Psychiatry

    No full text
    Applications of machine learning (ML) in biomedical science are growing rapidly, spurred by interdisciplinary collaborations, aggregation of large datasets, accessibility of analytic routines, and availability of powerful computers. With this increased usage comes a responsibility for education, borne equally by data scientists plying their wares in medical research and biomedical scientists harnessing such methods to glean knowledge from data. This article provides a critical review of ML, covering common ML methods and historical trends of their use in psychiatry, and identifying areas of opportunity for future applications of ML in biological psychiatry. We also establish the ML in Psychiatry (MLPsych) Consortium, enumerate its objectives, and provide a set of standards (Guidelines for REporting ML Investigations in Neuropsychiatry [GREMLIN]) for designing and reporting studies that use ML. This review serves as a cautiously optimistic primer on ML for those on the precipice as they prepare to dive into the field, either as dedicated methodological practitioners or, at the very least, well-informed consumers

    Pharmacogenetic‐based management of depression: Role of traditional Persian medicine

    No full text

    Identifying the Common Genetic Basis of Antidepressant Response

    No full text
    Background: Antidepressants are a first-line treatment for depression. However, only a third of individuals experience remission after the first treatment. Common genetic variation, in part, likely regulates antidepressant response, yet the success of previous genome-wide association studies has been limited by sample size. This study performs the largest genetic analysis of prospectively assessed antidepressant response in major depressive disorder to gain insight into the underlying biology and enable out-of-sample prediction. Methods: Genome-wide analysis of remission (nremit = 1852, nnonremit = 3299) and percentage improvement (n = 5218) was performed. Single nucleotide polymorphism–based heritability was estimated using genome-wide complex trait analysis. Genetic covariance with eight mental health phenotypes was estimated using polygenic scores/AVENGEME. Out-of-sample prediction of antidepressant response polygenic scores was assessed. Gene-level association analysis was performed using MAGMA and transcriptome-wide association study. Tissue, pathway, and drug binding enrichment were estimated using MAGMA. Results: Neither genome-wide association study identified genome-wide significant associations. Single nucleotide polymorphism–based heritability was significantly different from zero for remission (h2 = 0.132, SE = 0.056) but not for percentage improvement (h2 = βˆ’0.018, SE = 0.032). Better antidepressant response was negatively associated with genetic risk for schizophrenia and positively associated with genetic propensity for educational attainment. Leave-one-out validation of antidepressant response polygenic scores demonstrated significant evidence of out-of-sample prediction, though results varied in external cohorts. Gene-based analyses identified ETV4 and DHX8 as significantly associated with antidepressant response. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that antidepressant response is influenced by common genetic variation, has a genetic overlap schizophrenia and educational attainment, and provides a useful resource for future research. Larger sample sizes are required to attain the potential of genetics for understanding and predicting antidepressant response.</p

    Major Depressive Disorder in Older Patients as an Inflammatory Disorder: Implications for the Pharmacological Management of Geriatric Depression

    No full text
    corecore