28 research outputs found
Leading with heart: Academic leadership during the COVID-19 crisis
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted every sphere of life. It has brought into sharp focus
not only the critical role that leaders have to play in taking charge of their organisations and
employees, but the complexity of that leadership role, too. The authors of this paper are both
psychologists who occupy leadership positions in a university. The paper briefly explores the
evolution of leadership theory, leadership in times of crises, generally, and leadership during
the time of COVID-19. In addition, one of the authors offers a personal note on the leadership
experience during COVID-19. What became clear during the reflections was that empathy,
vulnerability, self-awareness and agility were some of the qualities needed during this crisis. In
addition, the psychodynamic concept of containment appears very relevant in managing the
affective intensity experienced by staff and students. Leaders were expected to not only fully
understand the meaning of empathy and compassion, but to know how to sincerely demonstrate
these qualities to staff and students alike
Qualitative theory testing as mixed-method research
While the concept of mixed-methods research is more usually associated with combining quantitative and qualitative approaches, this paper outlines a study that mixed methods by undertaking qualitative theory testing and derivation when examining the relationship between health promotion theory and hospital nursing practice. Thus, it is concerned with relating the metatheoretical aspects of the debate and not with the pragmatic aspects of the research and concomitant methods. A deductive–inductive–deductive design, based on the theory–research–theory strategy of Meleis (1985), tested, revised and developed for nursing established health promotion theory using theory-testing criteria. To complement the methodological mix, the study also used the theory (i.e. a health-promotion taxonomy) as a framework to contextualise the findings rather than generate theory in the way associated with interpretative inquiry. While inconsistent with the traditional view linking theory testing with quantitative, objective epistemology, the process enabled a theoretically robust health-promotion taxonomy to be synthesised and advanced for use in nursing in relation to a paradigm of social thought