Hemodynamic effects of intraoperative 30% versus 80% oxygen concentrations: an exploratory analysis

BackgroundSupplemental oxygen leads to an increase in peripheral vascular resistance which finally increases systemic blood pressure in healthy subjects and patients with coronary artery disease, heart failure, undergoing heart surgery, and with sepsis. However, it is unknown whether this effect can also be observed in anesthetized patients having surgery. Thus, we evaluated in this exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial the effect of 80% versus 30% oxygen on intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate.MethodsWe present data from a previous study including 258 patients, who were randomized to a perioperative inspiratory FiO2 of 0.8 (128 patients) versus 0.3 (130 patients) for major abdominal surgery. Continuous arterial blood pressure values were recorded every three seconds and were exported from the electronic anesthesia record system. We calculated time-weighted average (TWA) and Average Real Variability (ARV) of mean arterial blood pressure and of heart rate.ResultsThere was no significant difference in TWA of mean arterial pressure between the 80% (80 mmHg [76, 85]) and 30% (81 mmHg [77, 86]) oxygen group (effect estimate −0.16 mmHg, CI –1.83 to 1.51; p = 0.85). There was also no significant difference in TWA of heart rate between the 80 and 30% oxygen group (median TWA of heart rate in the 80% oxygen group: 65 beats.min−1 [58, 72], and in the 30% oxygen group: 64 beats.min−1 [58; 70]; effect estimate: 0.12 beats.min−1, CI –2.55 to 2.8, p = 0.94). Also for ARV values, no significant differences between groups could be detected.ConclusionIn contrast to previous results, we did not observe a significant increase in blood pressure or a significant decrease in heart rate in patients, who received 80% oxygen as compared to patients, who received 30% oxygen during surgery and for the first two postoperative hours. Thus, hemodynamic effects of supplemental oxygen might play a negligible role in anesthetized patients.Clinical Trail Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03366857?term=vienna&cond=oxygen&draw=2&rank=

Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Plasma Catecholamine Concentrations after Major Abdominal Surgery—Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Perioperative stress is associated with increased sympathetic activity that leads to increases in heart rate and blood pressure, which are associated with the development of perioperative myocardial ischemia. In healthy volunteers, it was shown that the administration of supplemental oxygen attenuated sympathetic nerve activity and subsequently led to lower plasma catecholamine concentrations. We therefore tested the hypothesis that perioperative supplemental oxygen attenuates sympathetic nerve in patients at risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing major abdominal surgery. We randomly assigned 81 patients to receive either 80% or 30% inspired oxygen concentration throughout surgery and the first two postoperative hours. We assessed noradrenaline, adrenaline, and dopamine plasma concentrations before the induction of anesthesia, two hours after surgery and on the third postoperative day. There was no significant difference in postoperative noradrenaline (effect estimated: −41.5 ng·L−1, 95%CI −134.3, 51.2; p = 0.38), adrenaline (effect estimated: 11.2 ng·L−1, 95%CI −7.6, 30.1; p = 0.24), and dopamine (effect estimated: −1.61 ng·L−1, 95%CI −7.2, 3.9; p = 0.57) concentrations between both groups. Based on our results, it seems unlikely that supplemental oxygen influences endogenous catecholamine release in the perioperative setting

Data_Sheet_1_Supplemental oxygen did not significantly affect two-year mortality in patients at-risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing moderate- to high-risk abdominal surgery–A follow-up analysis of a prospective randomized clinical trial.docx

BackgroundIn relatively healthy middle-aged patients, recent studies have shown that supplemental oxygen did not significantly increase one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. If supplemental oxygen influences long-term mortality, specifically in elderly patients with cardiovascular risk-factors, remains unknown. Thus, we evaluated the effect of supplemental oxygen on two-year mortality in patients with cardiovascular risk factors undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery.MethodsThis is a follow-up study of a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Two hundred fifty-eight patients, who were at least 45 years of age and at-risk for cardiovascular complications were randomly assigned to receive 80 vs. 30% oxygen during surgery and for the first two postoperative hours. Vital status was obtained from all patients 2 years after surgery using the national registry. Preoperative and postoperative maximum concentrations of NT-proBNP, Troponin T (TnT), Copeptin, von Willebrand Factor (vWF), static oxidation-reduction potential (sORP) and oxidation-reduction potential capacity (cORP) were tested for association with two-year mortality.ResultsThe median age of patients was 74 years (25th-75th percentile 70–78 years). 25.8% (95% CI: 17.3–32.4%) of patients in the 80% oxygen group and 22.3% (95% CI: 14.8–29.1%) in the 30% oxygen group died within 2 years after surgery. No significant difference in two-year mortality was found between patients, who received 80% oxygen concentration, versus patients, who received 30% oxygen concentration (estimated hazard ratio 1.145; 95% CI 0.693–1.893; p = 0.597). Preoperative Copeptin concentrations and postoperative maximum vWF activity were significantly associated with two-year mortality (p ConclusionOur results are consistent with previous studies, that showed that supplemental oxygen did not increase long-term mortality. Therefore, it is becoming more evident that supplemental oxygen may not have a significant effect on long-term outcome in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.</p