19 research outputs found

    The unadjusted frequency of macrovascular disease, stratified according to age and ethnicity

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "The management of diabetes in indigenous Australians from primary care"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/303</p><p>BMC Public Health 2007;7():303-303.</p><p>Published online 25 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2174478.</p><p></p> I = Indigenous, NI = Non-Indigenous, TN = total NEFRON cohort. Error bar denotes 95% confidence interva

    Geographic distribution of Australian practices enrolling Indigenous patients in the NEFRON study

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "The management of diabetes in indigenous Australians from primary care"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/303</p><p>BMC Public Health 2007;7():303-303.</p><p>Published online 25 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2174478.</p><p></p

    The unadjusted frequency of (a) CKD, stratified according to age and ethnicity

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "The management of diabetes in indigenous Australians from primary care"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/303</p><p>BMC Public Health 2007;7():303-303.</p><p>Published online 25 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2174478.</p><p></p> Crosshatch denotes patients with an elevated ACR, shading denotes patients with an eGFR < 60 mol/min/1.73 m, I = Indigenous, NI = Non-Indigenous, TN = total NEFRON cohort. Error bar denotes 95% confidence interval for CKD

    The frequency of an elevated urinary ACR (± 95% CI), stratified according to duration of diabetes

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "The management of diabetes in indigenous Australians from primary care"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/303</p><p>BMC Public Health 2007;7():303-303.</p><p>Published online 25 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2174478.</p><p></p> Dark squares denote Indigenous patients, white triangles denotes the total NEFRON cohort

    Early farmers from across Europe directly descended from Neolithic Aegeans—Hofmanová et al., 3D figure S4

    No full text
    Three-dimensional PCA of modern reference populations and projected ancient individuals. The Greek and Anatolian samples reported here cluster tightly with other European farmers close to modern-day Sardinians, however, are clearly distinct from previously published Caucasian hunter-gatherers. This excludes the latter as potential ancestral source population for early European farmers and suggests strong genetic structure in hunter-gatherers of southwest Asia. A two-dimensional version including the legend explaining the colour code are part of Figure 2 of the main text

    Summary of off-target scores for selected gRNAs.

    No full text
    <p>Off-targets numbers as determined by Cas-OFFinder [<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007503#pgen.1007503.ref009" target="_blank">9</a>] for Tyr2F, Tyr2R used in our experiment and Schaeffer (15).</p

    Analysis of CRISPR off-targets by whole genome sequencing.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Experimental design: Four sets of C57BL/6N parents gave rise to 9 control embryos (3 “no injection”, 3 “sham injection” with water only and 3 “Cas9 only”), and 10 treated embryos (5 were injected with Cas9 and Tyr2F gRNA and 5 were injected with Cas9 and Tyr2R gRNA). (b) Whole genome sequencing: All 27 mice / embryos were subjected to whole genome sequencing with median depth 39.5x and an average of 3.4% of bases with read depth less than 11x. (c) Variant calling and filtering: starting from the joint variant call (<i>bcftools mpileup + bcftools call</i>), a sequence of filter steps were performed to detect <i>de novo</i> mutations and remove likely false positives arising from low-level parental mosaicism and alignment errors at repeat regions. Parental-noise: alternate-allele reads present in either parent. Cross-noise: alternate reads from all other (non-parental) samples. (d) Filtered SNV and Indel counts are not significantly different within control groups, within treatment groups, or between control and treatment groups.</p
    corecore