5,243 research outputs found

    Direct methane conversion to methanol by ionic liquid-dissolved platinum catalysts

    Get PDF
    Ternary systems of inorganic Pt salts and oxides, ionic liquids and concentrated sulfuric acid are effective at catalyzing the direct, selective oxidation of methane to methanol and appear to be more water tolerant than the Catalytica reaction

    Three-dimensional tissue scaffolds from interbonded poly(e-caprolactone) fibrous matrices with controlled porosity

    Full text link
    In this article, we report on the preparation and cell culture performance of a novel fibrous matrix that has an interbonded fiber architecture, excellent pore interconnectivity, and controlled pore size and porosity. The fibrous matrices were prepared by combining melt-bonding of short synthetic fibers with a template leaching technique. The microcomputed tomography and scanning electron microscopy imaging verified that the fibers in the matrix were highly bonded, forming unique isotropic pore architectures. The average pore size and porosity of the fibrous matrices were controlled by the fiber/template ratio. The matrices having the average pore size of 120, 207, 813, and 994 mm, with the respective porosity of 73%, 88%, 96%, and 97%, were investigated. The applicability of the matrix as a three-dimensional (3D) tissue scaffold for cell culture was demonstrated with two cell lines, rat skin fibroblast and Chinese hamster ovary, and the influences of the matrix porosity and surface area on the cell culture performance were examined. Both cell lines grew successfully in the matrices, but they showed different preferences in pore size and porosity. Compared with two-dimensional tissue culture plates, the cell number on 3D fibrous matrices was increased by 97.27% for the Chinese hamster ovary cells and 49.46% for the fibroblasts after 21 days of culture. The fibroblasts in the matrices not only grew along the fiber surface but also bridged among the fibers, which was much different from those on two-dimensional scaffolds. Such an interbonded fibrous matrix may be useful for developing new fiber-based 3D tissue scaffolds for various cell culture applications

    Developing a Drought Planning Evaluation System in the United States

    Get PDF
    Drought is a normal part of the climate cycle, affecting every climate regime on the planet. Drought indicates a special period in which an unusual moisture scarcity causes a serious hydrological imbalance. Drought is related to the timing and effectiveness of the rains, high temperature, high wind, and low humidity. The typical impacts of drought may include dry lands, low or empty water-supply reservoirs, low groundwater levels (dried up wells), crop damage, and ensuing environmental degradation. In the United States, drought accounts for losses in the billions of dollars. In fact, a FEMA (1995) report estimates the average annual losses due to drought at $6-8 billion, on a par with hurricanes, making these the two most costly hazards impacting our country. Drought often affects several sectors (agriculture, recreation and tourism, energy, forestry, and others) at the same time and typically impacts large areas and many people. These impacts serve as indicators of our vulnerability and risk during extended periods of rainfall deficits. Our vulnerability to drought is affected by (among other factors) population growth and shifts, urbanization and sprawl, demographic characteristics, technology, water use trends, government policy, social behavior, and environmental awareness. These factors are continually changing, and society\u27s vulnerability to drought can increase or decrease in response to these changes. Although drought is a natural hazard, society can reduce its vulnerability and therefore lessen the risks associated with drought episodes. The impacts of drought, like those of other natural hazards, can be reduced through mitigation and preparedness. Planning ahead in an attempt to mitigate drought gives decision makers the chance to relieve the most suffering at the least expense. Reacting to drought in crisis mode decreases self-reliance and increases dependence on government and donors (Wilhite and Pulwarty, 2005). As a proof of concept approach, this paper looks into the process of comparing and evaluating state drought plans within the United States. The idea of evaluating (scoring) drought plans may be new, but similar methods have been applied to other hazards and in other planning fields, such as the environmental and urban/rural planning sectors (Baer 1997; Berke 2000; Brody 2003; Tang et a\. 2008). Even so, the planning profession itself has developed relatively few criteria for evaluating the quality of plans, so plan quality is difficult to define (Baer 1997). Now, and in a changing climate with changing vulnerabilities, Brody (2003) aptly notes that planners must be flexible, adapting and planning for changing conditions by gearing their efforts more toward uncertainty and surprise. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to assess the potential transferability of evaluation techniques in other fields and hazards to the evaluation of drought plans in the United States

    Developing a Drought Planning Evaluation System in the United States

    Get PDF
    Drought is a normal part of the climate cycle, affecting every climate regime on the planet. Drought indicates a special period in which an unusual moisture scarcity causes a serious hydrological imbalance. Drought is related to the timing and effectiveness of the rains, high temperature, high wind, and low humidity. The typical impacts of drought may include dry lands, low or empty water-supply reservoirs, low groundwater levels (dried up wells), crop damage, and ensuing environmental degradation. In the United States, drought accounts for losses in the billions of dollars. In fact, a FEMA (1995) report estimates the average annual losses due to drought at $6-8 billion, on a par with hurricanes, making these the two most costly hazards impacting our country. Drought often affects several sectors (agriculture, recreation and tourism, energy, forestry, and others) at the same time and typically impacts large areas and many people. These impacts serve as indicators of our vulnerability and risk during extended periods of rainfall deficits. Our vulnerability to drought is affected by (among other factors) population growth and shifts, urbanization and sprawl, demographic characteristics, technology, water use trends, government policy, social behavior, and environmental awareness. These factors are continually changing, and society\u27s vulnerability to drought can increase or decrease in response to these changes. Although drought is a natural hazard, society can reduce its vulnerability and therefore lessen the risks associated with drought episodes. The impacts of drought, like those of other natural hazards, can be reduced through mitigation and preparedness. Planning ahead in an attempt to mitigate drought gives decision makers the chance to relieve the most suffering at the least expense. Reacting to drought in crisis mode decreases self-reliance and increases dependence on government and donors (Wilhite and Pulwarty, 2005). As a proof of concept approach, this paper looks into the process of comparing and evaluating state drought plans within the United States. The idea of evaluating (scoring) drought plans may be new, but similar methods have been applied to other hazards and in other planning fields, such as the environmental and urban/rural planning sectors (Baer 1997; Berke 2000; Brody 2003; Tang et a\. 2008). Even so, the planning profession itself has developed relatively few criteria for evaluating the quality of plans, so plan quality is difficult to define (Baer 1997). Now, and in a changing climate with changing vulnerabilities, Brody (2003) aptly notes that planners must be flexible, adapting and planning for changing conditions by gearing their efforts more toward uncertainty and surprise. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to assess the potential transferability of evaluation techniques in other fields and hazards to the evaluation of drought plans in the United States

    When is Better Best? A multiobjective perspective

    Full text link
    Purpose: To identify the most informative methods for reporting results of treatment planning comparisons. Methods: Seven papers from the past year of International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics reported on comparisons of treatment plans for IMRT and IMAT. The papers were reviewed to identify methods of comparisons. Decision theoretical concepts were used to evaluate the study methods and highlight those that provide the most information. Results: None of the studies examined the correlation between objectives. Statistical comparisons provided some information but not enough to make provide support for a robust decision analysis. Conclusion: The increased use of treatment planning studies to evaluate different methods in radiation therapy requires improved standards for designing the studies and reporting the results
    corecore