26 research outputs found

    Predictors of first treatment discontinuation.

    No full text
    <p>Abbreviations: n: number, HR: Hazard Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval, IFN: Interferon, IM: intramuscular, SC: Subcutaneous, GA: Glatiramer Acetate, EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale.</p><p>Treatment initiations n = 760 excluding Natalizumab (n = 11).</p>α<p>Cox Proportional Hazards Regression.</p><p>Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards model was adjusted for sex, disease duration, age at treatment start, treatment and EDSS.</p><p># Proportional hazards test: p = 0.3747.</p>*<p>No EDSS score available at the time of treatment start.</p

    Baseline Patient Characteristics at subsequent treatment initiation.

    No full text
    <p>Abbreviations: n, number; y, years; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale.</p>α<p>Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> test.</p>β<p>One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test.</p>γ<p>Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test.</p

    Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for treatment discontinuation (Subsequent DMT).

    No full text
    <p>A: Treatment discontinuation by DMT. This figure demonstrates that patients prescribed Natalizumab as a subsequent DMT discontinue treatment at a significantly slower rate than those prescribed Glatiramer Acetate or any of the IFNβ preparations (adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards Regression, p = 0.000). B: Treatment discontinuation by EDSS. This figure demonstrates that patients with EDSS 1–2.5 (p = 0.046), EDSS 3–5.5 (p = 0.013) and EDSS ≥6 (p = 0.008) discontinue treatment at a significantly greater rate than those with EDSS 0 (adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards Regression).</p
    corecore