38 research outputs found

    Exercise During Pregnancy and Cesarean Delivery: North Carolina PRAMS, 2004-2005

    Get PDF
    Background—The current rate of cesarean delivery in the United States is 31 percent. Previous studies have suggested that exercise during pregnancy may be associated with a lower risk of cesarean delivery, but sample sizes were small and methods often inadequate. This study examined whether or not an association exists between prenatal exercise and delivery mode using data from the 2004 and 2005 North Carolina Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey. Methods—PRAMS postpartum questionnaire responses about frequency of exercise during the last 3 months of pregnancy for 1,955 women without a prior cesarean delivery were linked to birth certificates. Results—Among 1,342 women delivering at term, exercise was not associated with delivery mode in this data set: compared with women exercising less than once a week, neither women exercising 1 to 4 times per week nor those exercising 5 times or more per week had an altered risk of cesarean [RR (95% CL) 0.89 (0.69, 1.15), 1.04 (0.66, 1.64), respectively, adjusted for parity, gestational age, hypertension]. Among 613 women delivering preterm, the results were also not statistically significant, but a compelling trend toward a protective effect could be seen [RR (95% CL) 0.65 (0.38, 1.13), 0.62 (0.29, 1.33)]. Conclusions—Maternal self-reported frequency of exercise during pregnancy was not associated with a reduced risk of cesarean delivery. Larger studies with better exposure ascertainment may provide a more definitive answer

    Maternal Physical Activity and Birth Outcomes

    Get PDF
    Background: Information on physical activity (PA) during pregnancy and subsequent maternal birth outcomes (such as cesarean rate, labor duration) is plentiful in the literature, but consensus among studies is lacking. Poor exposure analytic methods may be a source of conflicting results. Objective: To estimate associations between PA during pregnancy and maternal birth outcomes using appropriate statistical methods. Methods: Detailed 7-day PA recalls were administered to pregnant women at two time points: 17-22 and 27-30 weeks' completed gestation. Covariables and labor outcomes were obtained by a combination of self-administered questionnaires and medical record abstraction. Physical activity was treated in analyses as a continuous, non-linear variable. We analyzed separately 8 different exposures: total hours/week PA at each time point, hours/week moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) at each time point; total hours/week recreational PA at each time point, and finally hours/week recreational MVPA at each time point. Outcomes included induction, labor duration, augmentation, operative vaginal delivery (OVD), cesarean birth, episiotomy, and laceration severity. Covariables for each model were selected using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs); variables in final models were chosen through backwards stepwise selection using analysis of deviance. Sensitivity analyses explored the effects of excluding women reporting extremely large PA volumes and of excluding women reporting zero hours/week PA. Results: Physical activity during pregnancy was associated with a decreased risk of induction. Recreational PA at the second time point only was associated with a decreased risk of augmentation. PA during pregnancy was associated with longer labor durations, but our measure of labor duration was crude and we do not consider this result definitive. PA was not associated in these data with episiotomy, OVD, or cesarean. PA may be associated with increased laceration severity, but effects were quite small. Conclusions: Lack of consensus in the literature on the associations between PA and maternal birth outcomes may be partially because of categorical treatment of the exposure and lack of attention to gestational age at time of exposure

    You’re from … where, again? A critical assessment of institutional diversity in the Society for Epidemiologic Research

    Get PDF
    The Society for Epidemiologic Research (SER) has recently taken laudable steps toward increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion within the society, including participation in the annual meeting. In this essay, we argue that there is one critical piece of the diversity and inclusion equation that is, however, overlooked: institution. At the 2019 Annual Meeting, a mere 8 institutions accounted for a disproportionate number of both oral concurrent sessions and symposium speakers. This lack of institutional diversity, unless addressed, will hinder SER’s ability to address other aspects of diversity, equity, and inclusion

    The Duration of Spontaneous Active and Pushing Phases of Labour among 75,243 US women when intervention is minimal: A prospective, observational cohort study

    Get PDF
    Background Friedman\u27s curve, despite acknowledged limitations, has greatly influenced labour management. Interventions to hasten birth are now ubiquitous, challenging the contemporary study of normal labour. Our primary purpose was to characterise normal active labour and pushing durations in a large, contemporary sample experiencing minimal intervention, stratified by parity, age, and body mass index (BMI). Methods This is a secondary analysis of the national, validated Midwives Alliance of North America 4·0 (MANA Stats) data registry (n = 75,243), prospectively collected between Jan 1, 2012 and Dec 31, 2018 to describe labour and birth in home and birth center settings where common obstetric interventions [i.e., oxytocin, planned cesarean] are not available. The MANA Stats cohort includes pregnant people who intended birth in these settings and prospectively collects labour and birth processes and outcomes regardless of where birth or postpartum care ultimately occurs. Survival curves were calculated to estimate labour duration percentiles (e.g. 10th, 50th, 90th, and others of interest), by parity and sub-stratified by age and BMI. Findings Compared to multiparous women (n = 32,882), nulliparous women (n = 15,331) had significantly longer active labour [e.g., median 7.5 vs. 3.3 h; 95th percentile 34.8 vs. 12.0 h] and significantly longer pushing phase [e.g., median 1.1 vs. 0.2 h; 95th percentile 5.5 vs. 1.1 h]. Among nulliparous women, maternal age \u3e35 was associated with longer active first stage of labour and longer pushing phase, and BMI \u3e30 kg/m² was associated with a longer active first stage of labour but a shorter pushing phase. Patterns among multiparous women were different, with those \u3e35 years of age experiencing a slightly more rapid active labour and no difference in pushing duration, and those with BMI \u3e30 kg/m² experiencing a slightly longer active labour but, similarly, no difference in pushing duration. Interpretation Nulliparous women had significantly longer active first stage and pushing phase durations than multiparous women, with further variation noted by age and by BMI. Contemporary US women with low-risk pregnancies who intended birth in settings absent common obstetric interventions and in spontaneous labour with a live, vertex, term, singleton, non-anomalous fetus experienced labour durations that were often longer than prior characterizations, particularly among nulliparous women. Results overcome prior and current sampling limitations to refine understanding of normal labour durations and time thresholds signaling ‘labour dystocia’

    Exposure Analysis Methods Impact Associations between Maternal Physical Activity and Cesarean Delivery

    Get PDF
    Background: Previous studies report conflicting results regarding a possible association between maternal physical activity (PA) and cesarean delivery. Methods: 7-day PA recalls were collected by telephone from n=1205 pregnant women from North Carolina, without prior cesarean, during two time windows: 17-22 weeks and 27-30 weeks completed gestation. PA was treated as a continuous, non-linear variable in binomial regressions (log-link function); models controlled for primiparity, maternal contraindications to exercise, pre-eclampsia, pre-gravid BMI, and percent poverty. We examined both total PA and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) at each time. Outcomes data came from medical records. Results: The dose-response curves between PA or MVPA and cesarean risk at 17-22 weeks followed an inverse J-shape, but at 27-30 weeks the curves reversed and were J-shaped. However, only (total) PA at 27-30 weeks was strongly associated with cesarean risk; this association was attenuated when women reporting large volumes of PA (>97.5th percentile) were excluded. Conclusion: We did not find evidence of an association between physical activity and cesarean birth. We did, however, find evidence that associations between PA and risk of cesarean may be non-linear and dependent on gestational age at time of exposure, limiting the accuracy of analyses that collapse maternal PA into categories
    corecore