The emergence of non-secretory multiple myeloma during the non-cytotoxic treatment of essential thrombocythemia: A case report

Introduction. The emergence of multiple myeloma as a second malignancy in patients with essential thrombocythemia is extremely rare. Several cases have been published so far, pointing out the impact of a cytotoxic effect during treatment of essential thrombocythemia on the development of multiple myeloma. Case presentation. We report the case of a 52-year-old Caucasian man who presented to our hospital because of leukocytosis, a slightly decreased hemoglobin level and thrombocytosis. After a complete hematological work-up, essential thrombocythemia was diagnosed. The patient was included in a multicenter clinical study, treated with anagrelide and his platelet counts were maintained in the normal range for more than 3 years. A sudden drop in his hemoglobin level with normal leukocyte and platelet count occurred at the same time as a back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging of his spine revealed the existence of a pathological fracture of Th4, the collapse of the upper edge of Th7 and osteolytic lesions of multiple thoracic vertebrae. Repeated hematological examinations, including bone biopsy with immunohistochemistry, disclosed diagnosis of multiple myeloma of the non-secretory type. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge this is the first published case in which multiple myeloma developed during the treatment of essential thrombocythemia with the non-cytotoxic drug anagrelide. Our attempts to find a common origin for the coexistence of multiple myeloma and essential thrombocythemia have not confirmed the genetic basis of their appearance. Further studies are needed to determine the biological impact of this coexistence

Patients with early stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia: new risk stratification based on molecular profiling

We investigated molecular and biological parameters reflecting the biology of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that may help us to predict the time to first treatment (TTT). A group of 33 patients with newly diagnosed CLL (Binet stage A) were analyzed. We developed a new scoring system based on the serum levels of beta(2)-microglobulin (beta M-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the expression of lipoprotein lipase (LPL). Patients with a score of 0 had a TTT of 58.4 months, while patients with a score of 3 (increased levels of beta M-2, LPL, and VEGF) had a significantly shorter TTT of only 10.6 months (p lt 0.0001)

De novo acute myeloid leukemia harboring concomitant t(8;21)(q22;q22);RUNX1::RUNX1T1 and BCR::ABL1 (p190 minor transcript)

De novo AMLs with typical nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities are often associated with specific morphology subtypes. The t(8;21) is one of the most prominent recurrent cytogenetic aberrations (RCA) in AML, frequently associated with AML with maturation, and is characterized as a good prognostic marker. On the contrary, BCR::ABL1 rearrangement is rarely observed in AMLs, without specific morphology, carrying poor prognosis. Its distinction from blastic transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia has been a matter of long debate. The revised WHO classification (2016) recognized AML with BCR::ABL1(+) as a provisional entity. The occurrence of additional cytogenetic aberrations in AML RCA within the same leukemic clone has been detected, albeit rare cases of BCR::ABL1(+) were reported, mainly as subclones. Those additional cytogenetic and molecular findings seem to significantly affect patient prognosis. Conventional cytogenetic analysis, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were applied at presentation and during the follow-up of the patient. We present a 34-year-old male patient with de novo AML harboring concomitant t(8;21) and t(9;22) in a single clone. The presence of both t(8;21) and Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) in the same metaphases but in less than 100% of the analyzed cells, the p190 BCR::ABL transcript type, and absence of splenomegaly support that additional BCR::ABL1(+) is a part of the main leukemic clone. These findings, accompanied with an encouraging outcome of continuous cytogenetic and molecular remission after induction therapy, support BCR::ABL1 being a secondary genetic event in AML with t(8;21)

Prognostic Significance of Cereblon Expression in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Within a personalized treatment approach in multiple myeloma (MM), the prognostic significance of cereblon (CRBN) expression was analyzed in 92 newly diagnosed patients. In patients treated with thalidomide-based combinations, CRBN expression significantly affected the treatment response (P = .028) and progression free survival (P = .017). With implications for the treatment outcome, measurement of CRBN expression might represent an additional prognostic tool in a personalized treatment approach. Background: To personalize the treatment approach for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), molecular markers such as cereblon (CRBN) are currently the focus of investigation. The aim of the present study was to test the prognostic significance of CRBN expression in MM patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients and Methods: The data from 92 previously untreated patients were analyzed. The distribution according to the International Staging System score was 26.1%, 30.4%, and 43.5% with a score of 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Thalidomide- and bortezomib-based combinations were used in 83.7% and 16.3% of the patients, respectively. Results: A treatment response (complete remission, very good partial remission, partial remission) was achieved in 83.7% of the patients and correlated with high CRBN expression (P = .006), mainly in the patients treated with thalidomide (P = .028). Low CRBN expression affected progression-free survival (PFS; P = .017) but not overall survival (OS) in patients treated with thalidomide and had no influence on OS in the bortezomib group. In the Cox regression model, low CRBN expression was the most important prognostic parameter that influenced PFS in the thalidomide-treated patients (P = .012). Conclusion: CRBN expression is of prognostic value in MM patients ineligible for ASCT treated with thalidomide as an immunomodulatory drug. With low expression indicating a possible suboptimal treatment outcome, measurement of CRBN expression might serve as additional prognostic tool in the personalized treatment approach