Perinatal and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome in late preterm fetal compromise: the TRUFFLE 2 randomised trial protocol

Introduction: Following the detection of fetal growth restriction, there is no consensus about the criteria that should trigger delivery in the late preterm period. The consequences of inappropriate early or late delivery are potentially important yet practice varies widely around the world, with abnormal findings from fetal heart rate monitoring invariably leading to delivery. Indices derived from fetal cerebral Doppler examination may guide such decisions although there are few studies in this area. We propose a randomised, controlled trial to establish the optimum method of timing delivery between 32 weeks and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. We hypothesise that delivery on evidence of cerebral blood flow redistribution reduces a composite of perinatal poor outcome, death and short-term hypoxia-related morbidity, with no worsening of neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years. Methods and analysis: Women with non-anomalous singleton pregnancies 32+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation in whom the estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference is <10th percentile or has decreased by 50 percentiles since 18-32 weeks will be included for observational data collection. Participants will be randomised if cerebral blood flow redistribution is identified, based on umbilical to middle cerebral artery pulsatility index ratio values. Computerised cardiotocography (cCTG) must show normal fetal heart rate short term variation (≥4.5 msec) and absence of decelerations at randomisation. Randomisation will be 1:1 to immediate delivery or delayed delivery (based on cCTG abnormalities or other worsening fetal condition). The primary outcome is poor condition at birth and/or fetal or neonatal death and/or major neonatal morbidity, the secondary non-inferiority outcome is 2-year infant general health and neurodevelopmental outcome based on the Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised questionnaire. Ethics and dissemination: The Study Coordination Centre has obtained approval from London-Riverside Research Ethics Committee (REC) and Health Regulatory Authority (HRA). Publication will be in line with NIHR Open Access policy. Trial registration number: Main sponsor: Imperial College London, Reference: 19QC5491. Funders: NIHR HTA, Reference: 127 976. Study coordination centre: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS with Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical & Life Sciences, Cardiff University. IRAS Project ID: 266 400. REC reference: 20/LO/0031. ISRCTN registry: 76 016 200

Inherited and acquired thrombophilias

4Thrombophilias represent an evolving story that continues to stir controversy for care providers and obstetrical patients. The predominant thrombophilic mutations include the factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation G20210A, methylene tetrahydrafolate reductase C667T, and deficiencies of the natural anticoagulants proteins C and S, and antithrombin. Prospective cohort studies have provided an accurate assessment of the risk of placenta-mediated complications posed by common inherited thrombophilic conditions. Acquired thrombophilic conditions consist of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS) and hyperhomocysteinemia. Well-conducted, placebo-controlled, randomized trials have demonstrated no benefit of anticoagulation in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and inherited thrombophilia. The routine use of anticoagulation to prevent other placenta-mediated complications in the setting of inherited thrombophilia should be considered experimental until the results of adequate clinical trials are available. Heparin anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies are the cornerstone of treatment of APAS in pregnancy.nonemixedRambaldi MP; Mecacci F; Guaschino S; Paidas MJRambaldi, Mp; Mecacci, F; Guaschino, Secondo; Paidas, M

Correction: Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166514.]

Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology

<div><p>Objective</p><p>To investigate the proportion of stillbirths at term associated with abnormal growth using customized birth weight percentiles and to compare histological placental findings both in underweight stillborn fetuses and in live births.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A retrospective case-control study of 150 singleton term stillbirths. The livebirth control groups included 586 cases of low-risk pregnancies and 153 late fetal growth restriction fetuses. Stillbirths and livebirths from low-risk pregnancies were classified using customized standards for fetal weight at birth, as adequate for gestational age (AGA; 10-90^th percentile), small (SGA; <10^th percentile) or large for gestational age (LGA; >90^th percentile). Placental characteristics in stillbirth were compared with those from livebirths using four categories: inflammation, disruptive, obstructive and adaptive lesions.</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a higher rate of SGA (26% vs 6%, p<0.001) and LGA fetuses (10.6% vs 5.6%, p<0.05) in the stillbirth group. Among stillbirth fetuses, almost half of the SGA were very low birthweight (≤3°percentile) (12% vs 0.3%, p<0.001). The disruptive (7.3% vs 0.17%;p<0.001), obstructive (54.6% vs 7.5%;p<0.001) and adaptive (46.6% vs 35.8%;p<0.001) findings were significantly more common in than in livebirth-low risk. Placental characteristics of AGA and SGA stillbirth were compared with those of AGA and FGR livebirth. In stillbirths-SGA we found a higher number of disruptive (12.8% vs 0%; p<0.001), obstructive (58.9% vs 23.5%;p<0.001) and adaptive lesions (56.4% vs 49%; p 0.47) than in livebirth-FGR.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The assessment of fetal weight with customized curves can identify fetuses which have not reached their genetically determined growth potential and are therefore at risk for adverse outcomes. Placental evaluation in stillbirths can reveal chronic histological signs that might be useful to clinical assessment, especially in underweight fetuses.</p></div

Placental characteristics in AGA and SGA stillbirth vs AGA and SGA livebirth.

<p>Placental characteristics in AGA and SGA stillbirth vs AGA and SGA livebirth.</p

Birthweight percentile by customized percentiles in stillbirth population.

<p>Birthweight percentile by customized percentiles in stillbirth population.</p

Patterns of histologic findings.

<p>Patterns of histologic findings.</p

Neonatal characteristics.

<p>Neonatal characteristics.</p