The Impact of Changing from First- to Fifth-Generation Nickel-Titanium Rotaries on Root-Filling Quality in a Clinical Undergraduate Course

In this retrospective study, it was investigated whether the use of a fifth-generation rotary system (ProTaper Next) resulted in improved radiological root filling quality compared to a first-generation counterpart (ProFile) in a controlled student course setting. Cases treated by fourth-year dental students in the 2020/21 academic year were collected and compared to those treated in 2019/20. Root canals in the former group were all instrumented using the ProTaper Next system, and the latter using the ProFile system. All other clinical parameters were similar between the two academic years, including the time of pre-clinical teaching, hands-on course hours, endodontic auxiliaries, and chemicals used for treatment. After excluding patients who were not available or refused to give their informed consent to this study (n = 20), and excluding teeth with missing or poor radiographs (n = 16), the fillings in 178 roots could be assessed by two calibrated observers blinded to the system that was used. The primary outcome was the radiographic quality of the root fillings according to the five-scale modified MOLANDER score. The secondary outcome was the number of separated rotary instruments by group. Both instrumenting systems resulted in a similar number of "excellent" root fillings (score I), 59 % in the ProTaper Next group and 60% in the ProFile group, with no statistically significant difference in outcome scores between groups (Probability > ChiSquare = 0.70). Furthermore, there was merely one separated instrument in the ProTaper Next group, and none in the ProFile group (Fisher's exact test, p = 1.00)

Diagnostik in der Endodontologie: Wo ist die Evidenz?

Die akkurate pulpale und periapikale Diagnostik ist entscheidend für den Erfolg einer zahnärztlichen Behandlung. Die Ursache der vorliegenden Schmerzen oder pathologischen Veränderungen muss geklärt werden, bevor die Therapie eingeleitet wird. Der Zustand der Pulpa und der periradikulären Gewebe lässt sich aber oft nur schwer bestimmen. Aufgrund der anatomischen Besonderheiten kommen i. d. R . indirekte klinische Diagnosemethoden zum Einsatz, welche allerdings nur sehr eingeschränkt mit den histologischen Veränderungen korrelieren. Daher kommt der korrekten Interpretation der diagnostischen Informationen eine hohe Bedeutung zu. Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die gängigen diagnostischen Verfahren, diskutiert deren Einsatzmöglichkeiten und Grenzen, klärt ihre Evidenz und ergänzt anhand von klinischen Beispielen

Need for dentists with post-graduate training in endodontology according to members of the Swiss Dental Association [Article in German]

This questionary-based study was financed by the Swiss Society for Endodontology (SSE). At the time of this survey (2022) there were merely 20 board-certified endodontists in Switzerland, and 239 other members of the SSE, i.e. general practitioners with some form of post-graduate endodontic training or a keen interest in the field. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the need for a higher number of trained endodontists as viewed by the general population of dentists in Switzerland. An electronic questionary in either German, French, or Italian was sent to all 4072 active members of the Swiss Dental Association (SSO). The questionnaire focused on the background of the surveyed dentists, their willingness to refer endodontic cases to a specialist or colleague with a focus on endodontics, their propensity to do so, and their perceived need for endodontists in their region. The response rate was 21%, and was similar between the different regions and cantons. Seventy-nine (9%) of the dentists participating in the survey were members of the SSE, while 16 (2%) were board-certified. Merely 7% of the participants received endodontic referrals themselves, while 81% referred cases in some instances. However, only 13% of participants referred endodontic cases always or regularly. The main reason for not referring was the belief by the surveyed dentists that they could perform the endodontic treatments themselves. Long distance to the next endodontic specialist or expert was the second most frequently given reason not to refer cases. A total of 58% of the participants believed that there were enough endodontists in Switzerland to cover the encountered clinical problems.This questionary-based study was financed by the Swiss Society for Endodontology (SSE). At the time of this survey (2022) there were merely 20 board-certified endodontists in Switzerland, and 239 other members of the SSE, i.e. general practitioners with some form of post-graduate endodontic training or a keen interest in the field. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the need for a higher number of trained endodontists as viewed by the general population of dentists in Switzerland. An electronic questionary in either German, French, or Italian was sent to all 4072 active members of the Swiss Dental Association (SSO). The questionnaire focused on the background of the surveyed dentists, their willingness to refer endodontic cases to a specialist or colleague with a focus on endodontics, their propensity to do so, and their perceived need for endodontists in their region. The response rate was 21%, and was similar between the different regions and cantons. Seventy-nine (9%) of the dentists participating in the survey were members of the SSE, while 16 (2%) were board-certified. Merely 7% of the participants received endodontic referrals themselves, while 81% referred cases in some instances. However, only 13% of participants referred endodontic cases always or regularly. The main reason for not referring was the belief by the surveyed dentists that they could perform the endodontic treatments themselves. Long distance to the next endodontic specialist or expert was the second most frequently given reason not to refer cases. A total of 58% of the participants believed that there were enough endodontists in Switzerland to cover the encountered clinical problems

Treatment options for permanent teeth with deep caries

The goal of this narrative review was to summarize and compare treatment options for permanent teeth carious lesions that are radiographically close to the pulp chamber. Thanks to adhesive restorative materials, minimally invasive approaches are possible. In this context, the old question arises as to whether caries must be excavated completely, i.e., down to hard dentin, or whether it could be advantageous to leave some soft dentin, or even merely seal the whole lesion. To answer this question, the microbiological aspects of the lesion must be considered, along with the immunological response in the dental pulp, with the concurrent possible negative outcomes for the patient. Both aspects are considered in this review, and clinical studies comparing different treatment modalities are discussed. Situations in which calcium silicate cements could be advantageous over the gold standard calcium hydroxide preparations for covering the dentin/pulp wound are also discussed

Treatment options for permanent teeth with deep caries

The goal of this narrative review was to summarize and compare treatment options for permanent teeth carious lesions that are radiographically close to the pulp chamber. Thanks to adhesive restorative materials, minimally invasive approaches are possible. In this context, the old question arises as to whether caries must be excavated completely, i.e., down to hard dentin, or whether it could be advantageous to leave some soft dentin, or even merely seal the whole lesion. To answer this question, the microbiological aspects of the lesion must be considered, along with the immunological response in the dental pulp, with the concurrent possible negative outcomes for the patient. Both aspects are considered in this review, and clinical studies comparing different treatment modalities are discussed. Situations in which calcium silicate cements could be advantageous over the gold standard calcium hydroxide preparations for covering the dentin/pulp wound are also discussed

What happened to our former students five to six years after graduation? An endodontic teacher's perspective

Endodontic teaching follows common concepts in the four Swiss dental schools. The aim of this survey was to ask former Swiss dental students how they adopted these endodontic concepts in clinical practice. All the graduates of the years 2012 and 2013 (n = 196) were targeted in 2018 using an internet-based anonymous questionnaire, which was based on five initial questions. One hundred forty-one individuals (participants) filled in these questions on their work situation and referral concepts (72% response rate). Those 111 participants who performed root canal treatments themselves were the focus group. They answered an additional 11 questions. Their affinity towards performing endodontic treatments was investigated. The use of rubber dam isolation served as a surrogate to see if biological principles were respected. Furthermore, it was asked which instrumentation systems they used in daily practice, and how they perceived the impact of their superior/employer on these choices. Of the 141 survey participants 55 were men and 86 women. Thirty-eight of these (27%) reported to refer difficult endodontic cases. Individuals in the focus group had an overall positive attitude towards endodontics. There was very little variance in the responses between the four Swiss dental schools. The vast majority (86.5%) reported to use rubber dam routinely. More than half in the focus group used reciprocating systems, and only a few (22.5%) would still use the rotary system they were taught at university. There was a significantly (p < 0.05) higher perceived impact of the employer on choice of instrumenting system versus the use of rubber dam

Factors affecting the outcome of orthograde root canal therapy in a general dentistry hospital practice.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to weigh the impact of patient-related, tooth-related, and treatment-related factors on therapy outcome in a series of consecutive patients. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-four patients were included. Of these, 66 (79%) were available for recall after \u3e or = 30 months (mean = 46 months). Root canal treatments were performed using a standard protocol. At recall, teeth were scored by means of the periapical index (PAI), which was the dependent variable (dichotomized to sound/ unsound). Explanatory variables were patient age, integrity of the nonspecific immune system, smoking status, dichotomized PAI score before treatment, initial treatment versus retreatment, prior exposition of the root canal to saliva, stainless-steel hand versus NiTi rotary instrumentation, and quality of root filling. Unit of observation was the patient-individual. Data were analyzed using univariate tests and backward stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: After 5 steps with elimination of the least significant independent variable, status of the immune system (P = .05), initial PAI (P = .04), and root filling quality (P = .01) were found to be the indispensable predictors for treatment outcome. Using these 3 explanatory variables, the logistic regression model had a predictive value of 87%, compared to 91% with all 8 variables. Success rate at recall (PAI \u3c or = 2 without symptoms) was 88% (95% CI = 78, 94). CONCLUSION: The integrity of a patient\u27s nonspecific immune system, which has been neglected in earlier investigations, is a significant predictor for endodontic treatment outcome, and should receive more attention in future studies

The Impact of Changing from First- to Fifth-Generation Nickel-Titanium Rotaries on Root-Filling Quality in a Clinical Undergraduate Course

In this retrospective study, it was investigated whether the use of a fifth-generation rotary system (ProTaper Next) resulted in improved radiological root filling quality compared to a first-generation counterpart (ProFile) in a controlled student course setting. Cases treated by fourth-year dental students in the 2020/21 academic year were collected and compared to those treated in 2019/20. Root canals in the former group were all instrumented using the ProTaper Next system, and the latter using the ProFile system. All other clinical parameters were similar between the two academic years, including the time of pre-clinical teaching, hands-on course hours, endodontic auxiliaries, and chemicals used for treatment. After excluding patients who were not available or refused to give their informed consent to this study (n = 20), and excluding teeth with missing or poor radiographs (n = 16), the fillings in 178 roots could be assessed by two calibrated observers blinded to the system that was used. The primary outcome was the radiographic quality of the root fillings according to the five-scale modified Molander score. The secondary outcome was the number of separated rotary instruments by group. Both instrumenting systems resulted in a similar number of "excellent" root fillings (score I), 59 % in the ProTaper Next group and 60% in the ProFile group, with no statistically significant difference in outcome scores between groups (Probability &gt; ChiSquare = 0.70). Furthermore, there was merely one separated instrument in the ProTaper Next group, and none in the ProFile group (Fisher's exact test, p = 1.00)