Voice Telerehabilitation in Iatrogenic Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis: From Necessity to Opportunity in the COVID-19 Time

Objective: To evaluate results of telerehabilitation (TR) during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic for the treatment of dysphonia caused by permanent post-thyroidectomy unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP). Methods: Forty subjects with post-thyroidectomy UVFP (onset <1 month) underwent TR. Videostrobolaryngoscopy, acoustic and perceptual voice analysis and patient self-assessment were carried out in person before, at the end of TR and 6 months later. Results: Twenty-five subjects spontaneously recovered full vocal fold motility at some time during follow-up, whereas 15 had a permanent UVFP at the end of the follow-up period. These subjects constituted our study group. At the early posttherapy control 10/15 subjects (66.6%) showed a complete glottal closure, while in 5/15 (33.3%) a glottal gap remained (P = 0.03). These results did not change 6 months after TR. At the late posttherapy control the maximum phonation time improved significantly (P = 0.02). Both post-therapy Voice Handicap Index scores were significantly lower than the pre-therapy ones (P = 0.04). Grade, Breathiness, and Asthenia parameters of the Grade-Roughness-Breathiness-Asthenia-Strain scale improved 6 months after TR (P < 0.05). The number of voice signals suitable for acoustic analysis increased significantly after therapy. Finally, 87% of patients were satisfied with TR. Conclusions: With careful patient selection, TR may be considered as a promising method for voice therapy in postthyroidectomy UVFP. Keywords: Telerehabilitation—Voice therapy—Thyroidectomy—Unilateral vocal fold paralysis–COVID-19–SARS-CoV-2

Riabilitazione fonatoria con protesi: il ruolo del logopedista

laringectomia totale, protesi tracheo-esofagea, riabilitazione fonatori

Rehabilitation After Total Laryngectomy: An Integrated Protocol Remotely Delivered During COVID-19

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the results of an integrated treatment delivered remotely to laryngectomized patients with voice prosthesis. Eighteen laryngectomized patients were treated remotely in groups co-led by a speech therapist and a psychologist ("Online Group"). The results were compared with those of 17 patients ("In-Person Group") previously studied. The two groups obtained comparable results on all parameters of the INFVo perceptual rating scale, in the DEP, ANX, PHO and HOS areas of the Symptom Check List-90-Revised questionnaire, and in the areas investigated by the WHOQOL-B questionnaire. The "In-Person Group" obtained statistically better results on the Italian Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngeal Cancer questionnaire. Although the in-person treatment favored the acceptance of the new voice and the development of conversational skills, telerehabilitation guaranteed an adequate level of assistance in terms of voice acquisition, prevention of anxiety and depression, and recovery of a good QoL

Olfactory perception rehabilitation after total laryngectomy (OPRAT): proposal of a new protocol based on training of sensory perception skills

PURPOSE: We aim to propose a new protocol for olfaction rehabilitation after total laryngectomy based on training of sensory perception levels using the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver. METHODS: This is a randomized clinical trial including patients undergoing total laryngectomy between March 2010 and March 2019. Patients with nasal or oral abnormalities, prior olfaction impairment, a muco-ciliary transport time higher than 30 min, positive history for feeding, and neurological disorders were excluded. Thirty-three patients were enrolled and were randomized into two groups: an Experimental group, submitted to the new protocol (olfactory perception rehabilitation after total laryngectomy-OPRAT) and a Control group that did not receive any treatment. Subjective Olfactometry, Chemosensory Complaints Score, and University of Washington Quality of Life version 4 questionnaires were used to assess the outcomes before and after treatment, and at 3-month, 6-month, and 10-month follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 33 patients included (32 men and 1 woman; mean age, 67.94\u2009\ub1\u20095.64 years), 17 were subjected to olfaction rehabilitation and 16 did not receive any treatment. At baseline evaluation, there were not significant differences between the two groups. At the end of treatment, the rehabilitated group improved their olfaction capability significantly. Such improvement remained stable over time, and after 10 months, only the Experimental group had significant improvements in all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The OPRAT may guarantee excellent results in the short- and long-term time with positive effects on the Quality of Life