Effects of an atypical drought on the benthic macroinvertebrate community in a tropical reservoir

<div><p>Abstract Atypical drought events have increasingly occurred in Brazil over the last years due to global climate changes. However, their consequences on aquatic biota in reservoirs are poorly known. We tested the hypothesis that macroinvertebrate communities are negatively affected by atypical drought events, given the sensitivity of many taxa to environmental changes. We predicted that: (a) there would be changes in limnological and sediment parameters between a regular year and an atypical year, (b) abundance and richness of the genera of Chironomidae and of exotic species would be higher due to the enhanced ability of these organisms to adapt to changes in the physical environment, and (c) community structure metrics (i. richness; ii. % richness; iii. abundance; iv. % abundance) would be affected by disturbance indices (i. Buffer Disturbance Index-BDI; ii. Local Disturbance Index-LDI; iii. Integrated Disturbance Index-IDI) in both years. The study was carried out in the reservoir of the Nova Ponte Hydroelectric Power Plant, state of Minas Gerais, comparing two sampling periods: a regular climatological year (2010) and an atypical drought year (2014). A total of 40 sampling sites were defined along the shore of the reservoir, and types of land use in the surrounding area of each site were measured, as well as physical habitat conditions, sediments, and benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Sampling was performed at these sites in the end of the rainy season in both years. The intensity of anthropogenic modifications was assessed at local scale and in the areas (buffers) surrounding the sampling sites using quantitative disturbance indices. There were striking differences in limnological parameters and sediment characteristics between sampling periods. Taxonomic richness was significantly lower in the drought year. As opposed to our predictions, richness and abundance of Chironomidae and exotic species did not increase with the atypical drought event. Besides, most community structure metrics showed a significant relationship with disturbance indices only during the regular climatological year, thus indicating that the large-scale effects of water stress may override the conditions of local habitats and the surrounding landscape. Therefore, in addition to a correct political-environmental management of water resources at local-scale, which includes maintaining the water quality and the riparian and landscape integrity, addressing large-scale climate issues is required for the maintenance of the ecological integrity of tropical reservoirs.</p></div

Means of the proportions of macroinvertebrate prey consumed by predators in each land use category based on stable isotopes analysis in R (SIAR) output.

<p>Means of the proportions of macroinvertebrate prey consumed by predators in each land use category based on stable isotopes analysis in R (SIAR) output.</p

Representation of the <i>δ</i>¹³C and <i>δ</i>¹⁵N of prey (mean ± SD) and predators in sites with different riparian land uses.

<p>Representation of the <i>δ</i>¹³C and <i>δ</i>¹⁵N of prey (mean ± SD) and predators in sites with different riparian land uses.</p

Locations of the nine stream sites selected according to their land use and study area in the states of Minas Gerais and Goiás, Brazil.

<p>Locations of the nine stream sites selected according to their land use and study area in the states of Minas Gerais and Goiás, Brazil.</p

Layman stable isotope metrics (mean and 95% credible intervals) for each land use category: NR_b = <i>δ</i>¹⁵N range; CR_b = <i>δ</i>¹³C range; CD_b = mean distance to centroid; MNND_b = mean nearest neighbor distance; and SDNND_b = standard deviation of mean distance to centroid.

<p>Layman stable isotope metrics (mean and 95% credible intervals) for each land use category: NR_b = <i>δ</i>¹⁵N range; CR_b = <i>δ</i>¹³C range; CD_b = mean distance to centroid; MNND_b = mean nearest neighbor distance; and SDNND_b = standard deviation of mean distance to centroid.</p

Taxa used in each trophic group analyzed.

<p>The letter “n” indicates the number of samples. Different numbers of invertebrates were used for each sample to reach a minimal amount of material for isotope analysis.</p

Freshwater invertebrate responses to fine sediment stress: a multi‐continent perspective

Excessive fine sediment (particles <2 mm) deposition in freshwater systems is a pervasive stressor worldwide. However, understanding of ecological response to excess fine sediment in river systems at the global scale is limited. Here, we aim to address whether there is a consistent response to increasing levels of deposited fine sediment by freshwater invertebrates across multiple geographic regions (Australia, Brazil, New Zealand and the UK). Results indicate ecological responses are not globally consistent and are instead dependent on both the region and the facet of invertebrate diversity considered, that is, taxonomic or functional trait structure. Invertebrate communities of Australia were most sensitive to deposited fine sediment, with the greatest rate of change in communities occurring when fine sediment cover was low (below 25% of the reach). Communities in the UK displayed a greater tolerance with most compositional change occurring between 30% and 60% cover. In both New Zealand and Brazil, which included the most heavily sedimented sampled streams, the communities were more tolerant or demonstrated ambiguous responses, likely due to historic environmental filtering of invertebrate communities. We conclude that ecological responses to fine sediment are not generalisable globally and are dependent on landscape filters with regional context and historic land management playing important roles.</p

Freshwater invertebrate responses to fine sediment stress: a multi‐continent perspective

Excessive fine sediment (particles <2 mm) deposition in freshwater systems is a pervasive stressor worldwide. However, understanding of ecological response to excess fine sediment in river systems at the global scale is limited. Here, we aim to address whether there is a consistent response to increasing levels of deposited fine sediment by freshwater invertebrates across multiple geographic regions (Australia, Brazil, New Zealand and the UK). Results indicate ecological responses are not globally consistent and are instead dependent on both the region and the facet of invertebrate diversity considered, that is, taxonomic or functional trait structure. Invertebrate communities of Australia were most sensitive to deposited fine sediment, with the greatest rate of change in communities occurring when fine sediment cover was low (below 25% of the reach). Communities in the UK displayed a greater tolerance with most compositional change occurring between 30% and 60% cover. In both New Zealand and Brazil, which included the most heavily sedimented sampled streams, the communities were more tolerant or demonstrated ambiguous responses, likely due to historic environmental filtering of invertebrate communities. We conclude that ecological responses to fine sediment are not generalisable globally and are dependent on landscape filters with regional context and historic land management playing important roles.</p

Supplementary information files for Freshwater invertebrate responses to fine sediment stress: a multi‐continent perspective

© the authors, CC-BY 4.0Supplemental files for article Freshwater invertebrate responses to fine sediment stress: a multi‐continent perspectiveExcessive fine sediment (particles <2 mm) deposition in freshwater systems is a pervasive stressor worldwide. However, understanding of ecological response to excess fine sediment in river systems at the global scale is limited. Here, we aim to address whether there is a consistent response to increasing levels of deposited fine sediment by freshwater invertebrates across multiple geographic regions (Australia, Brazil, New Zealand and the UK). Results indicate ecological responses are not globally consistent and are instead dependent on both the region and the facet of invertebrate diversity considered, that is, taxonomic or functional trait structure. Invertebrate communities of Australia were most sensitive to deposited fine sediment, with the greatest rate of change in communities occurring when fine sediment cover was low (below 25% of the reach). Communities in the UK displayed a greater tolerance with most compositional change occurring between 30% and 60% cover. In both New Zealand and Brazil, which included the most heavily sedimented sampled streams, the communities were more tolerant or demonstrated ambiguous responses, likely due to historic environmental filtering of invertebrate communities. We conclude that ecological responses to fine sediment are not generalisable globally and are dependent on landscape filters with regional context and historic land management playing important roles.</p

Appendix 1. from Systematic challenges and opportunities in insect monitoring: a Global South perspective

Publication record biased query and result