Predicting Early Mortality Among Implantable Defibrillator Patients Treated With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background: The beneficial effects of a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) in patients with heart failure, low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and wide QRS have clearly been established. Nevertheless, mortality r

The learning curve associated with the introduction of the subcutaneous implantable defibrillator

Aims: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) was introduced to overcome complications related to transvenous leads. Adoption of the S-ICD requires implanters to learn a new implantation technique. The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve for S-ICD implanters with respect to implant-related complications, procedure time, and inappropriate shocks (IASs). Methods and results: In a pooled cohort from two clinical S-ICD databases, the IDE Trial and the EFFORTLESS Registry, complications, IASs at 180 days follow-up and implant procedure duration were assessed. Patients were grouped in quartiles based on experience of the implanter and Kaplan-Meier estimates of complication and IAS rates were calculated. A total of 882 patients implanted in 61 centres by 107 implanters with a median of 4 implants (IQR 1,8) were analysed. There were a total of 59 patients with complications and 48 patients with IAS. The complication rate decreased significantly from 9.8% in Quartile 1 (least experience) to 5.4% in Quartile 4 (most experience) (P = 0.02) and non-significantly for IAS from 7.9 to 4.8% (P = 0.10). Multivariable analysis demonstrated a hazard ratio of 0.78 (P = 0.045) for complications and 1.01 (P = 0.958) for IAS. Dual-zone programming increased with experience of the individual implanter (P 13 implants). Conclusion: There is a short and significant learning curve associated with physicians adopting the S-ICD. Performance stab

Concomitant Off-Pump Modified Maze and Coronary Surgery

We describe a modification of the Cox-Maze III using bipolar radiofrequency combined with off-pump coronary artery surgery for the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease and long-standing permanent atrial fibrillation. This study reports the midterm outcome of 12 patients with coronary artery disease and long-standing permanent atrial fibrillation who underwent off-pump coronary artery surgery and concomitant modified Maze with bipolar radiofrequency. At a mean follow-up of 23 months, all patients were alive, and 75% (9 of 12) had sinus rhythm. Our modified Maze can be safely and effectively combined with coronary artery surgery in an off-pump setting. (Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:e96-8) (C) 2011 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeon

ECG Quantification of Myocardial Scar Does Not Differ between Primary and Secondary Prevention ICD Recipients with Ischemic Heart Disease

Background: Myocardial scar is an anatomic substrate for potentially lethal arrhythmias. Recent study showed that higher QRS-estimated scar size using the Selvester QRS score was associated with increased arrhythmogenesis during electrophysiologic testing. Therefore, QRS scoring might play a potential role in risk stratification before implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that QRS scores among ICD recipients for secondary prevention are higher than QRS scores in primary prevention patients. Methods and Results: From the hospital database, 100 consecutive patients with ischemic heart disease and prior ICD implantation were selected. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) had been obtained before implantation. ECGs were scored following the 32-points Selvester QRS scoring system and corrected for underlying conduction defects and/or hypertrophy. Ninety-three ECGs were suitable for scoring; seven ECGs were rejected because of noise, missing leads, excessive ventricular extrasystoles, or ventricular pacing. No statistically significant difference in QRS score was found between the primary [6.90 (standard deviation [SD] 3.94), n = 63] and secondary prevention group [6.17 (SD 4.50) (P = 0.260), n = 30]. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly higher in the secondary prevention group [31% (SD 13.5) vs 24% (SD 11.7) (P = 0.015)]. When patients with LVEF ≥35% were excluded, QRS scores were still comparable, namely 7.02 (SD 4.04) in the primary prevention group (n = 52) and 6.28 (SD 4.24) in the secondary (P = 0.510) (n = 18). Conclusion: We found no significant difference in QRS score between the ischemic primary and secondary prevention groups. Therefore, a role of the Selvester QRS score as a risk stratifier remains unlikely. (PACE 2010; 33:192–197

Early mortality in prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: development and validation of a clinical risk score

Aims: To reduce sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are indicated in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <= 35%. Current guidelines do not recommend device therapy in patients with a life expectancy <1 year since benefit in these patients is low. In this study, we evaluated the incidence and predictors of early mortality (<1 year after implantation) in a consecutive primary prevention population. Methods and results: Analysis was performed on a prediction and validation cohort. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year. The prediction cohort comprised 861 prophylactic ICD recipients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy or dilated cardiomyopathy from the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam) and Thorax Center Twente (Enschede). Detailed clinical data were collected. After multivariate analysis, a risk score was developed based on age >= 75 years, LVEF = 3 factors) risk group could be identified with 1-year mortality of, respectively, 3.4, 10.9, and 38.9% (P < 0.01). Afterwards, the risk score was validated in 706 primary prevention patients from the Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam). One-year mortality was, respectively, 2.5, 13.2, and 46.3% (all P < 0.01). Conclusion: A simple risk score based on age, LVEF, eGFR, and atrial fibrillation can identify patients at low, intermediate, and high risk for early mortality after ICD implantation. This may be helpful in the risk assessment of ICD candidates